Literature DB >> 3159831

Visual attention and stimulus identification.

H Pashler, P C Badgio.   

Abstract

Previous research has provided evidence for parallel stimulus processing in visual search tasks; however, it has frequently been noted that detecting prespecified targets might be accomplished without actually identifying targets and/or distractors. A novel task was employed to require exhaustive identification: Subjects named the highest digit in an array. Reaction times and display size effects in this task were strikingly similar to the conventional search tasks reported here. Manipulation of display size and visual quality was used to test predictions of serial versus parallel encoding models. Display size was additive with two different visual quality factors in the highest digit task, a finding that argues against serial execution of the corresponding stages. Interactions with decision-related factors suggest that visual quality may have affected the rate of character recognition, not just feature extraction. Thus, various aspects of the results seem to strengthen the case for parallel (though perhaps capacity-limited) identification of multiple familiar stimuli. In the General Discussion, it is pointed out that parallel identification need not entail late selection, and some alternative possibilities are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3159831     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Volatile visual representations: failing to detect changes in recently processed information.

Authors:  Mark W Becker; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

4.  On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.

Authors:  J G Rueckl; S Suzuki; S L Yeh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

5.  Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-08-08

6.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

7.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

8.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; S Yantis; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

9.  Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  G Chastain; M Cheal; D Lyon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

10.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.