Literature DB >> 16897098

Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.

Michael J Proulx1, Howard E Egeth.   

Abstract

The biased-competition theory of attention proposes that objects compete for cortical representation in a mutually inhibitory network; competition is biased in favor of the attended item. Here we test two predictions derived from the biased-competition theory. First we assessed whether increasing an object's relative brightness (luminance contrast) biased competition in favor of (i.e., prioritized) the brighter object. Second we assessed whether increasing an object's size biased competition in favor of the larger object. In fulfillment of these aims we used an attentional capture paradigm to test whether a featural singleton (an item unique with respect to a feature such as size or brightness) can impact attentional priority even when those features are irrelevant to finding the target. The results support the prediction that a singleton with respect to luminance contrast receives attentional prioritization and extend the biased-competition account to include size contrast, because a large singleton also receives attentional prioritization.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897098     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0077-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Color coding in a visual search task.

Authors:  B F GREEN; L K ANDERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

Review 3.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attentional misguidance in visual search.

Authors:  S Todd; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

9.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual search among items of different salience: removal of visual attention mimics a lesion in extrastriate area V4.

Authors:  J Braun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.

Authors:  Nicholas E DiQuattro; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  A F Ten Brink; T C W Nijboer; N Van der Stoep; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Integrating Action and Language through Biased Competition.

Authors:  Ed Symes; Mike Tucker; Giovanni Ottoboni
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds.

Authors:  Marina Dimitrova; Nina Stobbe; H Martin Schaefer; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Object width modulates object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Joseph C Nah; Marco Neppi-Modona; Lars Strother; Marlene Behrmann; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Size matters: large objects capture attention in visual search.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of attentional priority and saliency in determining capacity limits in enumeration and visual working memory.

Authors:  David Melcher; Manuela Piazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural correlates of individual performance differences in resolving perceptual conflict.

Authors:  Franziska Labrenz; Maria Themann; Edmund Wascher; Christian Beste; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.