Literature DB >> 2057307

On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.

J G Rueckl1, S Suzuki, S L Yeh.   

Abstract

It takes longer to detect a target if it is the initial letter of a nonredundant letter string such as BNHTW than if it is the initial letter of a redundant letter string such as BBBBB (Johnson, 1986b; Johnson & Blum, 1988). The results of the present study reveal that the redundancy effect also occurs for mixed-case letters strings (e.g., BbbBb) and digit strings (e.g., 22222). In addition, these results suggest that the cause of the redundancy effect is not related to the visual properties of the noninitial letters per se but is instead related to the presence of the target in noninitial positions. Together, these results rule out a number of hypotheses about the cause of the redundancy effect and suggest that the locus of this effect is in processes involved in response selection and/or the read-out of information from the perceptual system.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2057307     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  When redundancy hurts letter detection: an attempt to define one condition.

Authors:  N F Johnson; A J Blum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

4.  Visual attention and stimulus identification.

Authors:  H Pashler; P C Badgio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.

Authors:  N F Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

6.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effect of similarity of surround on target-letter processing.

Authors:  R G Shapiro; L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Repeating the target neither speeds nor slows its detection: evidence for independent channels in letter processing.

Authors:  L E Krueger; R G Shapiro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Response competition: a major source of interference in a tactile identification task.

Authors:  P M Evans; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.