Hydrogenases are metalloenzymes that catalyze the conversion of protons and molecular hydrogen, H2. [FeFe]-hydrogenases show particularly high rates of hydrogen turnover and have inspired numerous compounds for biomimetic H2 production. Two decades of research on the active site cofactor of [FeFe]-hydrogenases have put forward multiple models of the catalytic proceedings. In comparison, our understanding of proton transfer is poor. Previously, residues were identified forming a hydrogen-bonding network between active site cofactor and bulk solvent; however, the exact mechanism of catalytic proton transfer remained inconclusive. Here, we employ in situ infrared difference spectroscopy on the [FeFe]-hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii evaluating dynamic changes in the hydrogen-bonding network upon photoreduction. While proton transfer appears to be impaired in the oxidized state (Hox), the presented data support continuous proton transfer in the reduced state (Hred). Our analysis allows for a direct, molecular unique assignment to individual amino acid residues. We found that transient protonation changes of glutamic acid residue E141 and, most notably, arginine R148 facilitate bidirectional proton transfer in [FeFe]-hydrogenases.
Hydrogenases are metalloenzymes that catalyze the conversion of protons and molecular hydrogen, H2. [FeFe]-hydrogenases show particularly high rates of hydrogen turnover and have inspired numerous compounds for biomimetic H2 production. Two decades of research on the active site cofactor of [FeFe]-hydrogenases have put forward multiple models of the catalytic proceedings. In comparison, our understanding of proton transfer is poor. Previously, residues were identified forming a hydrogen-bonding network between active site cofactor and bulk solvent; however, the exact mechanism of catalytic proton transfer remained inconclusive. Here, we employ in situ infrared difference spectroscopy on the [FeFe]-hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii evaluating dynamic changes in the hydrogen-bonding network upon photoreduction. While proton transfer appears to be impaired in the oxidized state (Hox), the presented data support continuous proton transfer in the reduced state (Hred). Our analysis allows for a direct, molecular unique assignment to individual amino acid residues. We found that transient protonation changes of glutamic acid residue E141 and, most notably, arginine R148 facilitate bidirectional proton transfer in [FeFe]-hydrogenases.
Hydrogenases are gas-processing
iron–sulfur enzymes that
catalyze the reversible reduction of protons to molecular hydrogen
in all kingdoms of life.[1,2] Most hydrogenases are
biased toward H2 oxidation, for example, in the context
of energy metabolism and H2 sensing.[3−5] The [FeFe]-hydrogenases
from bacteria and algae, in contrast, are truly bidirectional and
catalyze H2 oxidation and H2 evolution with
similar efficiency.[6−8] Combining high turnover frequencies (10 000
H2 s–1) and a catalytic midpoint potential
close to the H+/H2 redox couple,[9−11] the active site cofactor of [FeFe]-hydrogenases (“H-cluster”)
inspired the design of numerous biomimetic complexes for H2 production.[12−14]The H-cluster comprises a conventional [4Fe-4S]
center linked to
a bimetallic iron–sulfur complex (Figure a).[15−17] The diiron site carries two terminal
carbonyl and cyanide ligands (CO, CN–) as well as
a single carbonyl ligand in Fe–Fe bridging position (μCO).[18−20] An aminodithiolate (ADT) group connects the proximal and distal
iron ion (Fep and Fed, relative to the [4Fe-4S]
center)[21] and functions as proton relay
between active site cofactor and protein environment.[22] While prokaryotic [FeFe]-hydrogenases like CPI from Clostridium pasteurianum and DDH from Desulfovibrio
desulfuricans hydrogenase) bind additional iron–sulfur
clusters, the enzyme from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (HYDA1) exclusively carries the H-cluster.[6]
Figure 1
The proton transfer pathway of [FeFe]-hydrogenases and experimental
strategy. (a) Hydrogen turnover is catalyzed at the H-cluster
that is formed by a diiron site attached to the protein via a [4Fe-4S]
center. The diiron site binds five to six CO and CN– ligands, one of which can be found in Fe–Fe bridging position
(μCO). The ADT group functions as proton relay between C169
and the distal iron ion of the H-cluster, Fed. Residues involved in proton transfer are identified. Cartoon
model of the oxidized [FeFe]-hydrogenase from CPI according to pdb
entry 4XDC,
numbering refers to HYDA1. (b) Steady-state illumination
of 5′-carboxy eosin Y (5CE, photosensitizer) at 505 nm populated
the excited triplet state, 5CE*. The latter was quenched by the oxidized
enzyme to enrich Hred over Hox. Increasing
the basicity upon reduction induces a protonation of the H-cluster.
The associated changes in the hydrogen-bonding network of the catalytic
proton transfer pathway are followed by in situ ATR
FTIR difference spectroscopy. The sacrificial electron donor EDTA
rereduced 5CE+ to 5CE.
The proton transfer pathway of [FeFe]-hydrogenases and experimental
strategy. (a) Hydrogen turnover is catalyzed at the H-cluster
that is formed by a diiron site attached to the protein via a [4Fe-4S]
center. The diiron site binds five to six CO and CN– ligands, one of which can be found in Fe–Fe bridging position
(μCO). The ADT group functions as proton relay between C169
and the distal iron ion of the H-cluster, Fed. Residues involved in proton transfer are identified. Cartoon
model of the oxidized [FeFe]-hydrogenase from CPI according to pdb
entry 4XDC,
numbering refers to HYDA1. (b) Steady-state illumination
of 5′-carboxy eosin Y (5CE, photosensitizer) at 505 nm populated
the excited triplet state, 5CE*. The latter was quenched by the oxidized
enzyme to enrich Hred over Hox. Increasing
the basicity upon reduction induces a protonation of the H-cluster.
The associated changes in the hydrogen-bonding network of the catalytic
proton transfer pathway are followed by in situ ATR
FTIR difference spectroscopy. The sacrificial electron donorEDTA
rereduced 5CE+ to 5CE.During hydrogen turnover, the H-cluster adopts different redox
and protonation states. The oxidized resting state (Hox)[23−25] can be distinguished from intermediates with a reduced [4Fe-4S]
center (Hred′, Hhyd)[26−32] or a reduced diiron site (Hred, Hsred).[33−35] These states are formed upon concerted proton and electron transfer.
The active-ready geometry of Hox is characterized by
a square-pyramidal configuration of both metal ions, a μCO ligand,
and an open coordination site at Fed.[15−17] While this
geometry is conserved in Hred′ and Hhyd,[27,30] the structural changes upon reduction of
the diiron site are under debate.[36] The
H-cluster may undergo rigorous ligand rearrangement forming a μH
geometry, which would exclude both Hred and Hsred from catalytic turnover.[35] Alternatively,
diiron site geometries with a bridging[37,38] or “semi-bridging”
CO ligand[20] have been suggested. On the
basis of the assumption of a protonated ADT group in these species,
the nomenclature HredH+ and HsredH+ can be found
in literature.[34][FeFe]-hydrogenases
exchange protons with the bulk solvent via
a trajectory of conserved, polar amino acid residues that connect
active site cofactor and protein surface (Figure a).[39−41] Making use of protein crystallography
and infrared spectroscopy, previously we were able to identify the
residues that render catalytic proton transfer possible.[42] In the [FeFe]-hydrogenase from C. reinhardtii, this includes R148, E144, S189, E141, C169 (numbers 1–5
in Figure a), and
water cluster W1. A second, mostly aqueous proton transfer pathway
facilitates protonation of the [4Fe-4S] center.[27] These protons are not consumed in the H2 release
reaction but stabilize the active-ready geometry and compensate for
the drop in redox potential after a first reduction step.[26,32] The dynamics of catalytic proton transfer have been addressed by
molecular dynamics simulations before;[43−45] however, no experimental
data exist on the changes in the hydrogen-bonding network, for example,
when switching from H2 evolution to H2 oxidation.
Such data are key to understanding the bidirectional catalysis of
[FeFe]-hydrogenases.The high extinction coefficient of the
active site CO and CN– ligands facilitated numerous
investigations of the
H-cluster by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.[25−34] In chromophoric proteins, FTIR difference spectroscopy is routinely
used for the analysis of light-induced proton transfer steps.[46−48] However, compared to the H-cluster ligands, the involved amino acid
side chains exhibit a drastically lower extinction coefficient and
overlap with the intense absorption bands of liquid water and the
protein backbone. [FeFe]-hydrogenases lack a natural chromophore to
selectively trigger catalytic activity and protonation changes by
light, which renders an analysis of proton transfer challenging. Redox
dyes provides an opportunity to characterize hydrogen-bonding networks
in visibly transparent enzymes.[49]Here, we explore the dynamics of proton transfer in HYDA1 using in situ attenuated total reflection (ATR) FTIR difference
spectroscopy. We report steady-state photoreduction
of the H-cluster in the presence of 5′-carboxy eosin Y (5CE)[50] that resulted in a fast (t1/2 ≈ 20 s), near complete (>90%), and highly selective
redox conversion (<5% other species) of the one-electron reduced
state Hred over the oxidized resting state, Hox (Figure b). These
parameters were not achieved by in situ gas treatments[27,30] or electrochemical titrations.[32,35] The proton
uptake associated with formation of Hred induced spectral
differences in the IR regime from 1750 to 1650 cm–1. Exploiting in situ H/D exchange and site-directed
mutagenesis, these differences are assigned to the C=O stretching
vibrations of carboxylic acid side chains (COOH) and the coupled vibrational
mode of an protonated arginine side chain (C(NH2)3+). Infrared spectroscopy provides evidence for changes
in hydrogen bonding involving glutamic acid E141 and serineS189 close
to the active site as well as glutamic acid E144 and arginine R148
near the protein surface. This work presents the first direct, experimental
characterization of the hydrogen-bonding network that facilitates
catalytic proton transfer in [FeFe]-hydrogenases.
Experimental Section
The [FeFe]-hydrogenase from C. reinhardtii HYDA1
was expressed and synthesized in Escherichia coli, purified by strep-tactin affinity chromatography, and activated in vitro with synthetic ADT-containing diiron complex under
anaerobic conditions.[51,52] After removal of excess complex,
the protein concentration was adjusted to ∼3 mM (∼150
g/L). 5′-Carboxy eosin Y (5CE)[50] and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were prepared in aqueous
stock solutions of 6 and 90 mM, respectively. One part of each component
was mixed to yield a HYDA1/5CE/EDTA ratio of 1:2:30.All spectroscopic
experiments were performed under anaerobic conditions,
at room temperature, ambient pressure, and on hydrated protein films
of physiological pH values. First, 1–2 μL of the reaction
mix was pipetted onto the silicon crystal of the ATR unit (DuraDisc
SamplIR-2, Smiths Detection) in the FTIR spectrometer (Tensor 27,
Bruker). Spectra from 3900–1300 cm–1 were
recorded with a narrow-band mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector
with a spectral resolution of 2 cm–1 and 25 interferometer
scans each (80 kHz). The solution was protected from stray light,
dried under N2, and rehydrated via the gas phase with 10
mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES)
buffer (pH 6). Traces of reduced and CO-inhibited species were lost
in favor of Hox upon auto-oxidation.[27]For the pH jump experiments, guanidine-HCl was solved
in H2O or D2O. Ten microliters of a 1000 g L–1 guanidine-HCl solution (pH ≈∼ 8) was
pipetted onto
the ATR crystal and continuously measured by FTIR spectroscopy. Addition
of 1 μL of NaOH solution (∼100 g L–1, in H2O or D2O) increased the bulk pH above
the pKa of guanidine-HCl (∼13.5)
deprotonating the guanidinium ion.
Results
The experiment
was initiated upon steady-state illumination of the
film at 505 nm and followed by FTIR spectroscopy
with a time resolution of 5 s (up to 60 s, see Figure S1). After ∼20 s, half of the Hox population converted into Hred. Importantly, no other
reduced species than Hred were observed, although H2 released upon reduction of HYDA1[50] may rereact with the enzyme forming Hred′, Hsred, and Hhyd. Therefore, the continuous exchange
of gas in our setup was found to be of particular importance, as it
precludes reoxidation of H2 and a buildup of multiple reduced
species.[22] No photoreduction was observed
under off-resonant conditions (590 nm), whereas illumination at 455
nm induced notable H-cluster corruption (Figure S2), as noted earlier.[53]Figure a shows
an overlay of absorbance spectra in the range of 3900–1300
cm–1 in the dark (black) and light (magenta). The
absorbance ratio of ∼1.3 for amide I (1635 cm–1) to amide II (1545 cm–1) suggests a well-hydrated
protein film.[27] From 2700 to 1800 cm–1 neither liquid water (H2O) nor protein
solution show strong IR intensities, which allows analyzing the CO/CN– bands of the H-cluster in absolute spectra. The inset
highlights the IR signature of the H-cluster from 2150 to 1750 cm–1. The difference spectrum in Figure b emphasizes how the hydrogenase adopted Hox in the dark while Hred clearly dominated
upon illumination. The respective IR band patterns have been identified
earlier.[34,35] Fitting these patterns to absolute spectra
before and after illumination indicated a redox conversion larger
than 90%.
Figure 2
Absorbance and light-induced difference spectra of [FeFe]-hydrogenase. (a) ATR FTIR absorbance spectra of the hydrated reaction mixture
(HYDA1/5CE/EDTA) in the dark (black) and upon illumination at 505
nm (magenta). (inset) Magnification of the cofactor regime (2150–1750
cm–1). (b) Subtraction of single channel spectra
from the same data set. The dark–light difference spectrum
in the CO/CN– regime of the H-cluster shows conversion
of Hox (black, negative bands) into Hred (magenta, positive bands). (c) The full difference spectrum allows
analyzing the OH, SH, and COOH regime as well as frequencies less
than 1500 cm–1 comprising vibrational marker bands
of photosensitizer 5CE. (inset) Magnification of the COOH regime.
The band changes are specific for functional HYDA1 (black) and not
observed in HYDA1 apoprotein (red). * 2337 cm–1,
assigned to CO2.
Absorbance and light-induced difference spectra of [FeFe]-hydrogenase. (a) ATR FTIR absorbance spectra of the hydrated reaction mixture
(HYDA1/5CE/EDTA) in the dark (black) and upon illumination at 505
nm (magenta). (inset) Magnification of the cofactor regime (2150–1750
cm–1). (b) Subtraction of single channel spectra
from the same data set. The dark–light difference spectrum
in the CO/CN– regime of the H-cluster shows conversion
of Hox (black, negative bands) into Hred (magenta, positive bands). (c) The full difference spectrum allows
analyzing the OH, SH, and COOH regime as well as frequencies less
than 1500 cm–1 comprising vibrational marker bands
of photosensitizer 5CE. (inset) Magnification of the COOH regime.
The band changes are specific for functional HYDA1 (black) and not
observed in HYDA1 apoprotein (red). * 2337 cm–1,
assigned to CO2.In contrast to the CO/CN– bands, the intense
absorbance of liquid water (HOH bending) and protein backbone (amide
I, amide II) overlaps with signals in the COOH regime from 1750 to
1650 cm–1 and precludes any meaningful analysis
in absolute spectra. Figure c shows a “dark–light” difference spectrum
computed from the single channel spectra that generated the absorbance
spectra in Figure a. The cofactor bands clearly dominate the spectrum. Efficient photoreduction
prevents an accumulation of unspecific changes in the film (i.e.,
hydration level, protein concentration) and allows analyzing the full
spectrum. This includes the OH, SH, and COOH regime as well as frequencies
less than 1600 cm–1 comprising marker bands of the
photosensitizer 5CE (Figure S2).All difference bands in the COOH regime are specific for functional
HYDA1. The inset in Figure c shows that no such changes were observed when HYDA1 apoprotein
was probed (apo-HYDA1 lacks the diiron site and is catalytically unreactive[51,52]). Moreover, difference spectra of HYDA1 recorded upon exposure to
CO (Hox-CO over Hox) or in the presence
of zinc porphyrin as an alternative redox dye[54] (Hred′ over Hox) confirmed that
all bands in the COOH regime are specific for the formation of Hred (Figure S3).It is important
to point out that our results do not suggest protonation
or hydrogen-bonding differences involving OH or SH groups (Figure S4). The former would give rise to sharp
absorbance bands around 3650 cm–1 indicative of
“dangling”, weakly hydrogen-bonded water.[55,56] The SH group absorbs around 2550 cm–1 and is very
sensitive to changes in hydrophilicity.[56−58] Typically, this frequency
regime is addressed to analyze hydrogen-bonding changes involving
the side chain of a cysteine, for example, C169. Comparing our data
with recent work by Hirota et al. on [NiFe]-hydrogenases[58] shows that the signal-to-noise ratio of the Hred – Hox difference spectrum would allow
identifying potential changes in the OH and SH regime (Figure S4). However, the lack thereof suggests
an invariable hydrogen-bonding network between the water cluster W1,
C169, and the ADT headgroup of the H-cluster (Figure a).
Band Fitting and Tentative Assignments
The Hred – Hox spectrum in the
COOH regime was described
by a fit routine including a minimum of nine Gaussians with a fixed
half-max width of 6–8 cm–1 and third-order
polynomial baseline correction (Figure a). The temporal evolution of these bands is in excellent
agreement with those of the H-cluster (Figure S1). Vibrations at frequencies greater than 1700 cm–1 are typically assigned to the C=O stretches of the COOH side
chain from aspartic acid or glutamic acid residues (E, D).[57,59] The C=O stretching frequency is inversely proportional to
the hydrogen-bonding strength and can vary between none to multiple
hydrogen-bonding partners from 1750 to 1700 cm–1. Besides clearly discriminable bands at 1721, 1715, and 1700 cm–1 our fit routine suggested additional contributions
centered at 1710, 1696, 1690, and 1681 (Figure a). The negative band at 1681 cm–1 may be attributed to the asymmetric C(NH2)3+ vibration of the protonated arginine side chain,[60−62] while the broader features at ∼1670 and 1655 cm–1 potentially arise from changes in amide I absorbance.[63] The latter likely reflects minor changes in
secondary structure induced upon reduction of the H-cluster.
Figure 3
Band
fit and H/D exchange. (a) The experimental ATR
FTIR difference spectrum of the Hred – Hox conversion (black) was fitted with a minimum of six Gaussians in
the COOH regime of aspartic or glutamic acid residues (blue), a single
band that may stem from the C(NH2)3+ vibration of an arginine (magenta), and two contributions in the
amide regime (gray). The red dotted line depicts the resulting sum
of fits. (b) Comparison of ATR FTIR difference spectra on hydrated
and deuterated film (black and red, respectively). The data indicate
a downshift of 6–14 cm–1 for bands associated
with Hox (negative intensities) and similar frequency
difference for bands accumulating upon reduction (positive intensities).
No significant shift was noted for the positive bands at 1721 and
∼1670 cm–1.
Band
fit and H/D exchange. (a) The experimental ATR
FTIR difference spectrum of the Hred – Hox conversion (black) was fitted with a minimum of six Gaussians in
the COOH regime of aspartic or glutamic acid residues (blue), a single
band that may stem from the C(NH2)3+ vibration of an arginine (magenta), and two contributions in the
amide regime (gray). The red dotted line depicts the resulting sum
of fits. (b) Comparison of ATR FTIR difference spectra on hydrated
and deuterated film (black and red, respectively). The data indicate
a downshift of 6–14 cm–1 for bands associated
with Hox (negative intensities) and similar frequency
difference for bands accumulating upon reduction (positive intensities).
No significant shift was noted for the positive bands at 1721 and
∼1670 cm–1.
H/D Exchange
To achieve an experimental band assignment
in the COOH regime, we performed photoreduction on hydrated and deuterated
hydrogenases films. Bands indicative of hydrogen bonding or protonation
changes involving the carboxylic side chains are supposed to shift
to lower frequencies in deuterated sample.[63] Absorbance spectra of the HYDA1/5CE/EDTA reaction mixture show a
complete exchange of solvent in the presence of either H2O or D2O, and Hred – Hox difference spectra prove that deuteration did not affect the H-clusters’
CO/CN– band position (Figure S5). However, in the COOH regime, the spectra show significant
changes (Figure b).
The prominent H/D shift of 1715 and 1700 cm–1 to
1709 and 1694 cm–1 immediately supports an assignment
of this motif to a titratable group, for example, an aspartic or glutamic
acid side chain. Bands at 1696 and 1690 cm–1 were
affected by the H/D shift as well. While a dissection of components
is not immediately possible here, the mean frequency downshift by
12 ± 2 cm–1 suggests strongly hydrogen-bonded
aspartic or glutamic acid side chains.[57,59] The positive
band at 1721 cm–1 is insensitive to H/D exchange.To achieve an unambiguous experimental band assignment, we analyzed
three amino acid variants of the proton transfer pathway, namely,
R148A, E144D, and S189A. The enrichment of Hred over Hox depends on functional proton transfer.[33−35] In particular,
amino acid residues C169 and E141 close to the H-cluster were found
to be susceptible to variations of the hydrogen-bonding network, slowly
accumulating the hydride state Hhyd over Hox rather than Hred (Figure S6). This impedes a direct comparison, and only a limited number of
variants allowed screening the hydrogen-bonding changes associated
with catalytic proton transfer. An invariable hydrogen-bonding network
between H-cluster and E141 is in striking agreement with the aforementioned
lack of hydrogen-bonding changes around W1 and C169 (Figure S4). Relative to the H-cluster, we will refer to C169,
W1, and E141 as “inner core” of the proton transfer
pathway.By contrast, Figure shows Hred – Hox difference
spectra
of HYDA1 variants that constitute the “outer core” of
the proton transfer pathway, namely, R148, E144, and S189. Site-directed
mutagenesis at these positions included an exchange against alanine
(A). No accumulation of Hred was observed upon photoreduction
of E144A (Figure S6) so that the conservative
variation of glutamic to aspartic acid was analyzed instead. Variants
R148A, E144D, and S189A adopted Hred upon illumination
but showed only 15–25% of the native conversion efficiency
(Figure S7). For comparison with native
HYDA1, difference spectra were normalized to the amplitude of the
band pair at 1715 and 1700 cm–1 that was found to
be prominently conserved in all spectra. The resulting scaling factors
were in good agreement with the amplitudes observed for the CO difference
bands of the conversion of Hred over Hox. Figure S6 depicts the spectral transitions
over time for each variant including an evaluation of signal-to-noise
in the COOH regime.
Figure 4
Spectral and structural differences between native
[FeFe]-hydrogenase
and three variants. (left) The in situ ATR
FTIR difference spectra for three different amino acid variants compared
to native HYDA1 (dotted traces, scaled to the 1715/1700 difference
signal that was observed in all experiments). The crystallographic
comparison on the right side includes CPI coordinates 4XDC, 6GM2,
6GM3, and 6GM4. (a) Arginine variant R148A lacks the positive 1721
cm–1 feature and shows significantly diminished
contributions at 1696 and 1681 cm–1 (“X”).
(b) Glutamic acid variant E144D exhibits an ∼21 cm–1 upshift of the native 1721 cm–1 band to 1742 cm–1. Negative bands at 1692 and 1682 cm–1 suggest similarities with native enzyme, whereas the band intensity
at 1688 cm–1 is inverted. (c) The difference spectrum
of serine variant S189A indicates a largely native behavior with only
smaller differences in band intensity. See Figure S7 for further details.
Spectral and structural differences between native
[FeFe]-hydrogenase
and three variants. (left) The in situ ATR
FTIR difference spectra for three different amino acid variants compared
to native HYDA1 (dotted traces, scaled to the 1715/1700 difference
signal that was observed in all experiments). The crystallographic
comparison on the right side includes CPI coordinates 4XDC, 6GM2,
6GM3, and 6GM4. (a) Arginine variant R148A lacks the positive 1721
cm–1 feature and shows significantly diminished
contributions at 1696 and 1681 cm–1 (“X”).
(b) Glutamic acid variant E144D exhibits an ∼21 cm–1 upshift of the native 1721 cm–1 band to 1742 cm–1. Negative bands at 1692 and 1682 cm–1 suggest similarities with native enzyme, whereas the band intensity
at 1688 cm–1 is inverted. (c) The difference spectrum
of serine variant S189A indicates a largely native behavior with only
smaller differences in band intensity. See Figure S7 for further details.
Amino Acid Variant R148A
The H2 evolution
activity of ∼50% for HYDA1 variant R148A indicates that glutamic
acid E144 can partially replace R148 as proton loading site.[42]Figure a shows an overlay of Hred – Hox difference spectra in the COOH regime for R148A and native HYDA1
(left panel). The right panel depicts an overlay of the respective
CPI crystal structures. For the sake of convenience, we will use HYDA1
numbering here. Site-directed mutagenesis resulted in spectra with
missing features at 1721, 1696, or 1681 cm–1 (marked
“X”), while the shift from 1715 to 1700 cm–1 and a negative band at 1690 cm–1 was conserved.Above, we tentatively assigned the negative feature at 1681 cm–1 to the asymmetric C(NH2)3+ vibration of an arginine residue.[60−62] The evident
lack of this band in amino acid variant R148A supports this assignment.
Moreover, the band at 1681 cm–1 shifted to 1607
cm–1 in deuterated sample, which is in excellent
agreement to guanidine hydrochloride H/D reference spectra in Figure . Therefore, we conclude
deprotonation of R148+ upon formation of Hred in native HYDA1. Poisson–Boltzmann calculations predicted
a pKa of ∼3.5 for E144 in native
HYDA1 (Table S1). Although our experiments
were conducted at pH 6, we suggest hydrogen bonding of E144 to R148
(∼2.8 Å) and S189 (∼3.1 Å) stabilizing the
carboxylic over the carboxylate form of E144. However, the carboxylate
form likely prevails in the absence of the arginine side chain. The
lack of spectral features at 1721 and 1696 cm–1 in
the R148A difference spectrum (X) therefore facilitates the assignment
to hydrogen-bonding changes involving E144 in native HYDA1.
Figure 5
Experimental
assignment of arginine R148. (a) Comparison
of Hred – Hox difference spectra
on hydrated and deuterated film (black and red, respectively) as in Figure . Isotope downshifts
associated with COOH group are indicated by blue dashes. The band
at 1681 cm–1 was tentatively assigned to the protonated
guanidinium headgroup of R148+. In the presence of D2O, a negative feature at 1607 cm–1 was observed,
most likely representing the deuterated arginine. (b) pH jump experiments
on guanidine-HCl solved in H2O (black) or D2O (red). The difference spectra depict deprotonation of the guanidinium
ion (negative bands) at pH ≈ 14. Both the absolute band positions
and the H/D-specific downshift closely match the Hred – Hox difference spectrum in (a).
Experimental
assignment of arginine R148. (a) Comparison
of Hred – Hox difference spectra
on hydrated and deuterated film (black and red, respectively) as in Figure . Isotope downshifts
associated with COOH group are indicated by blue dashes. The band
at 1681 cm–1 was tentatively assigned to the protonated
guanidinium headgroup of R148+. In the presence of D2O, a negative feature at 1607 cm–1 was observed,
most likely representing the deuterated arginine. (b) pH jump experiments
on guanidine-HCl solved in H2O (black) or D2O (red). The difference spectra depict deprotonation of the guanidinium
ion (negative bands) at pH ≈ 14. Both the absolute band positions
and the H/D-specific downshift closely match the Hred – Hox difference spectrum in (a).
Glutamic Acid Variant E144D
As observed for the arginine
variant, the interaction between R148 and E144 (E144D) is not strictly
essential for catalytic activity. Amino acid variant E144D is reported
with ∼50% H2 evolution activity.[42]Figure b shows an overlay of Hred – Hox difference spectra in the COOH regime for R144D and native HYDA1
(left panel). The right panel depicts an overlay of the respective
CPI crystal structures.[42] Site-directed
mutagenesis resulted in spectra with a pronounced band upshift from
1721 to 1742 cm–1 and an intensity inversion of
the band at ∼1690 cm–1 (negative in native
HYDA1, slightly shifted and positive in E144D). The band pair at 1715
and 1700 cm–1 and negative bands at 1694 and 1681
cm–1 are conserved among variant and native HYDA1.Shortening of the alkyl side chain at position 144 causes a different
hydrogen-bonding situation (Figure b, right panel). Instead of forming a hydrogen bond
with R148 (∼5.0 Å) rotation of the aspartic acid side
chain forces D144 into a weak complex with S189 in Hox (3.0 and 3.7 Å) that reflects in a pKa increase of nearly three units compared to native HYDA1 (Table S1). The upshift of the E144 band from
1721 to 1742 cm–1 suggests significantly weaker
hydrogen bonding in reduced enzyme. Furthermore, variant E144D allows
differentiating the 1696/1690 cm–1 peak doublet.
The latter band appears positive in the spectrum, and thus only the
1696 cm–1 band is assigned to E144.
Serine Variant
S189A
Figure c shows an overlay of Hred – Hox difference spectra in the COOH regime for S189A and native
HYDA1 (left panel). The right panel depicts an overlay of the respective
CPI crystal structures.[42] Despite the relatively
low H2 evolution activity of ∼10%, site-directed
mutagenesis resulted in spectra indicative of only minor differences
to native HYDA1. The crystal structure of the S189A variant revealed
an additional water molecule (W*) between E144 and E141 (Figure c, right panel).
This arrangement was proposed to compensate the lack of the serine
side chain.[42] E144 is in fair hydrogen-bonding
distance to W* (∼2.4 Å) and R148 (∼2.9 Å),
which largely restores the spectral phenotype of native HYDA1. However,
the distance of 5.8 Å between E141 and W* is clearly out of range
for hydrogen bonding or proton transfer.
Glutamic Acid E141
The band pair at 1715 and 1700 cm–1 is prominently
conserved in all protein samples that
accumulate Hred over Hox. The H/D specific
band shift hints at a carboxylic group and suggests efficient proton
exchange; however, the motif could not be assigned to E144. Residing
in a hydrophobic pocket at the interface of inner and outer core of
the proton transfer pathway, glutamic acid E141 has been calculated
to adopt the carboxylic acid form for pH values less than 8.[42] Accordingly, changes associated with E141 will
be visible in the COOH regime.[57] Any variation
of E141 abolished catalytic activity and the formation of Hred (Figure S5) hinting at the central role
of E141 in proton transfer. On the basis of this line of evidence,
we assign the band pair at 1715 and 1700 cm–1 to
E141. Figure S7 provides a conclusive overview
on the observed frequencies and experiment band assignment.The C=O stretching frequencies of glutamic acid E141 indicate
strong hydrogen-bonding contacts, irrespective of redox state.[57,59] To this end, the crystal structure of oxidized enzyme supports a trans complex between E141 and W1 (distances 2.4 and 3.4
Å).[64−66] The 15 cm–1 frequency downshift
upon reduction may reflect a release of the E141/W1 complex in favor
of hydrogen bonding with S189 (or W* in serine variant S189A). This
demands a certain level of structural flexibility, as the distance
between E141 and S189 amounts to ∼3.8 Å in oxidized enzyme.
Molecular dynamics simulations showed that E141 and S189 change between
hydrogen-bonding donor and acceptor when switching from proton uptake
to proton release.[43,45] Apparently, smaller structural
changes at the interface of inner and outer core are well within the
thermodynamic range of functional [FeFe]-hydrogenases. The large distance
between E141 and W* (5.8 Å) reduces the probability of proton
transfer in serine variant S189A to ∼10% H2 release
activity.[42] The experimental assignment
of our data is summed up in Figure and Table .
Figure 6
Band assignment. Our analysis of native [FeFe]-hydrogenase
in H2O and D2O as well as seven different amino
acid variants implies a downshift of the band at 1715 cm–1 by 14 cm–1 (red) and an upshift of the band at
1696 cm–1 by 25 cm–1 (blue). The
former is assigned to E141 suggesting stronger hydrogen bonding in Hred. The latter is assigned to E144 suggesting the loss of
a hydrogen-bonding partner (weaker hydrogen bonding). The negative
band at 1681 cm–1 (magenta) is assigned to deprotonation
of R148+ upon formation of Hred. No conclusive
assignment is available for the bands at 1710 and 1690 cm–1 (dashed traces).
Table 1
Band Assignmenta
v, cm–1
redoxstate
residue
H-bonds
donor
acceptor
1742*
Hred
D144
none
1721
Hred
E144
single
S189
1715
Hox
E141
double
W1
1700
Hred
E141
double
W1
S189
1696
Hox
E144
double
R148
S189
1681
Hox
R148+
single
E144
IR frequencies
(v) refer to native HYDA1 except as noted (*). The
identity of hydrogen-bonding
partners differs between amino acid variants.
Band assignment. Our analysis of native [FeFe]-hydrogenase
in H2O and D2O as well as seven different amino
acid variants implies a downshift of the band at 1715 cm–1 by 14 cm–1 (red) and an upshift of the band at
1696 cm–1 by 25 cm–1 (blue). The
former is assigned to E141 suggesting stronger hydrogen bonding in Hred. The latter is assigned to E144 suggesting the loss of
a hydrogen-bonding partner (weaker hydrogen bonding). The negative
band at 1681 cm–1 (magenta) is assigned to deprotonation
of R148+ upon formation of Hred. No conclusive
assignment is available for the bands at 1710 and 1690 cm–1 (dashed traces).IR frequencies
(v) refer to native HYDA1 except as noted (*). The
identity of hydrogen-bonding
partners differs between amino acid variants.
Discussion
Figure a depicts
the progression of amino acid residues involved in catalytic proton
transfer as identified in the crystal structure of oxidized [FeFe]-hydrogenase
(Hox).[42] This arrangement
favors proton uptake and H2 evolution. Arginine R148+ donates a hydrogen bond to glutamic acid E144 (3.1 Å),
the latter forming a hydrogen bond with serineS189 (2.8 Å).[43−45] On the basis of pKa calculations, we
previously favored an ionic bond between R148+ and the
carboxylate of E144;[42] however, such stabilization
fails to explain the FTIR band changes. Trapped between R148 and S189,
E144 likely persists in protonated, carboxylic acid form, even at
pH values well above the predicted pKa of 3.5 (Table S1).
Figure 7
The hydrogen-bonding
network of the catalytic proton transport
pathway. (a) Progression of amino acid residues as observed
in the crystal structure of oxidized [FeFe]-hydrogenase CPI (Hox). All distances refer to pdb coordinates 4XDC (HYDA1 numbering).
Our data suggest hydrogen-bonding contacts between S189, E144, and
R148+ of the catalytic proton transport pathway. Furthermore,
invariable hydrogen bonding between ADT, C169, and W1 was observed.
The W1/E141 complex establishes the difference between inner and outer
core of the catalytic proton transport pathway. (b) In reduced [FeFe]-hydrogenase
(Hred), the W1/141 complex is terminated in favor of
hydrogen bonding between E141, S189, and E144, which facilitates continuous
proton transfer (see main text for details). Our data indicate deprotonation
of R148+ upon formation of Hred.
The hydrogen-bonding
network of the catalytic proton transport
pathway. (a) Progression of amino acid residues as observed
in the crystal structure of oxidized [FeFe]-hydrogenase CPI (Hox). All distances refer to pdb coordinates 4XDC (HYDA1 numbering).
Our data suggest hydrogen-bonding contacts between S189, E144, and
R148+ of the catalytic proton transport pathway. Furthermore,
invariable hydrogen bonding between ADT, C169, and W1 was observed.
The W1/E141 complex establishes the difference between inner and outer
core of the catalytic proton transport pathway. (b) In reduced [FeFe]-hydrogenase
(Hred), the W1/141 complex is terminated in favor of
hydrogen bonding between E141, S189, and E144, which facilitates continuous
proton transfer (see main text for details). Our data indicate deprotonation
of R148+ upon formation of Hred.SerineS189 is located at the interface of inner and outer
core
of the proton transfer pathway, as defined above. The distance of
∼3.8 Å between S189 and E141 does reflect discontinued
hydrogen bonding, and the probability of proton transfer appears insufficient
to justify turnover frequencies greater than 10 000 H2 s–1.[9−11] The crystal structure supports
E141 and water molecule W1 forming a trans complex
that represents the most stable configuration of COOH groups in aqueous
solution.[64−66] This arrangement would interrupt the catalytic hydrogen-bonding
network as indicated by the yellow boxes in Figure . The E141/W1 complex is weakened by the
relatively long donor distance (α = 3.4 Å), which may alleviate
changing from W1 to S189 as hydrogen-bond acceptor, for example, upon
reduction of the H-cluster.Our IR data are compatible with
subtle structural changes upon
formation of Hred. Figure b illustrates how the catalytic proton transfer pathway
between active site cofactor and solvent is significantly more continuous
in the reduced enzyme. The downshift of the E141 band may reflect
dissolution of the E141/W1 complex and hydrogen bonding to S189 with
α > β (in the oxidized crystal, β is 0.4 Å
larger than α; see Figure a). SerineS189 donates a single bond to E144; however,
no second hydrogen bond is formed by E144 due to deprotonation of
R148+. This is in agreement with the pronounced upshift
of the E144 band. We assume that a reprotonation of R148 is precluded
by the unfavorable local electrostatics betweenE144 and R148+. Our data support a model in which the E144/R148 interface is defined
by the OH donor group of the E144 side chain, held in place by a hydrogen
bond from S189 (Figure b). Formation of R148+ appears to be hindered in the presence
of a potential hydrogen-bonding donor. The stability of deprotonated
arginine residues in proteins has been questioned[67] and, to our knowledge, has not been observed before. Yet,
our spectroscopic investigation on hydrated and deuterated [FeFe]-hydrogenase
clearly allows concluding deprotonation of R148+ upon reduction
of the enzyme. This conserved arginine functions as proton donor to
the active site cofactor, fine-tuning proton transfer efficiency and
catalytic bias.The mechanism of discontinuous proton transfer
conceptualized above
likely includes a transient step we can speculate about now. Reduction
of the H-cluster by one electron leads to an increase in basicity
and the formation of Hred upon protonation via the catalytic
proton transfer pathway. On the basis of the lack of difference signals
in the SH and OH regime, we consider a rigid donor/acceptor conformation
between the H-cluster, C169, and W1. Protonation of the ADT headgroup
in Hred was discussed[33−35] and computed earlier,[43−45] but the present data do not support steady-state protonation changes at the ADT headgroup, cysteine thiolate, or
water cluster. Transiently, however, formation of Hred may trigger deprotonation of E141 (Figure S8). In a second step, the high basicity of E141– would induce steady-state deprotonation of R148+, proton
transfer via E144 and S189, and reprotonation of E141, now hydrogen-bonded
to S189 instead of W1 (Figure b).
Conclusions
In this work, we demonstrate how in situ infrared
spectroscopy was applied to analyze the hydrogen-bonding network of
the catalytic proton transfer pathway in [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Discontinuous
proton transfer was triggered by the enhanced basicity of the active
site cofactor (H-cluster) upon photoreduction of a highly active iron–sulfur
enzyme lacking a natural chromophore. Infrared spectroscopy provides
a direct read-out for changes in hydrogen bonding perfectly complementary
to X-ray crystallography. Thereby, the first experimental description
of the dynamic hydrogen-bonding changes in the catalytic proton transfer
pathway of [FeFe]-hydrogenases was accomplished.Discontinuous
proton transfer is common in nature, for example,
in retinal proteins,[68,69] photosystem II,[70] cytochrome c oxidase,[71] and other systems,[48,72] but it has not yet
been considered in hydrogenases. Our model rationalizes how ions transcend
the gap between inner and outer core of the proton transfer pathway.
Furthermore, it provides a reasonable explanation for the catalytic
bidirectionality of [FeFe]-hydrogenases.[6−8] Glutamic acid E141 switches
as hydrogen-bonding donor between W1 (proton uptake) and S189 (proton
release). Deviations in distance less than 0.5 Å suggest a flexible
hydrogen-bonding network that facilitates both H2 evolution
(proton uptake) and H2 oxidation (proton release).
Authors: Moritz Senger; Stefan Mebs; Jifu Duan; Florian Wittkamp; Ulf-Peter Apfel; Joachim Heberle; Michael Haumann; Sven Timo Stripp Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael W Ratzloff; Jacob H Artz; David W Mulder; Reuben T Collins; Thomas E Furtak; Paul W King Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Constanze Sommer; Agnieszka Adamska-Venkatesh; Krzysztof Pawlak; James A Birrell; Olaf Rüdiger; Edward J Reijerse; Wolfgang Lubitz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Fraser A Armstrong; Rhiannon M Evans; Suzannah V Hexter; Bonnie J Murphy; Maxie M Roessler; Philip Wulff Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 22.384
Authors: Sven T Stripp; Benjamin R Duffus; Vincent Fourmond; Christophe Léger; Silke Leimkühler; Shun Hirota; Yilin Hu; Andrew Jasniewski; Hideaki Ogata; Markus W Ribbe Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 72.087
Authors: Oliver Lampret; Jifu Duan; Eckhard Hofmann; Martin Winkler; Fraser A Armstrong; Thomas Happe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marco Lorenzi; Mira T Gamache; Holly J Redman; Henrik Land; Moritz Senger; Gustav Berggren Journal: ACS Sustain Chem Eng Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 9.224