Literature DB >> 31522945

Integrative Protein Modeling in RosettaNMR from Sparse Paramagnetic Restraints.

Georg Kuenze1, Richard Bonneau2, Julia Koehler Leman3, Jens Meiler4.   

Abstract

Computational methods to predict protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) restraints that only require assignment of backbone signals, hold great potential to study larger proteins. Ideally, computational methods designed to work with sparse data need to add atomic detail that is missing in the experimental restraints. We introduce a comprehensive framework into the Rosetta suite that uses NMR restraints derived from paramagnetic labeling. Specifically, RosettaNMR incorporates pseudocontact shifts, residual dipolar couplings, and paramagnetic relaxation enhancements. It continues to use backbone chemical shifts and nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints. We assess RosettaNMR for protein structure prediction by folding 28 monomeric proteins and 8 homo-oligomeric proteins. Furthermore, the general applicability of RosettaNMR is demonstrated on two protein-protein and three protein-ligand docking examples. Paramagnetic restraints generated more accurate models for 85% of the benchmark proteins and, when combined with chemical shifts, sampled high-accuracy models (≤2Å) in 50% of the cases.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR spectroscopy; Rosetta; integrative modeling; paramagnetic NMR; protein structure prediction; sparse experimental restraints

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31522945      PMCID: PMC6834914          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  87 in total

1.  De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

Authors:  P M Bowers; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Paramagnetism-based versus classical constraints: an analysis of the solution structure of Ca Ln calbindin D9k.

Authors:  I Bertini; A Donaire; B Jiménez; C Luchinat; G Parigi; M Piccioli; L Poggi
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  PCS-based structure determination of protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Tomohide Saio; Masashi Yokochi; Hiroyuki Kumeta; Fuyuhiko Inagaki
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data.

Authors:  Srivatsan Raman; Oliver F Lange; Paolo Rossi; Michael Tyka; Xu Wang; James Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Theresa A Ramelot; Alexander Eletsky; Thomas Szyperski; Michael A Kennedy; James Prestegard; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  High-resolution structure of the Shigella type-III secretion needle by solid-state NMR and cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Demers; Birgit Habenstein; Antoine Loquet; Suresh Kumar Vasa; Karin Giller; Stefan Becker; David Baker; Adam Lange; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Three-dimensional protein fold determination from backbone amide pseudocontact shifts generated by lanthanide tags at multiple sites.

Authors:  Hiromasa Yagi; Kala Bharath Pilla; Ansis Maleckis; Bim Graham; Thomas Huber; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Protein-protein HADDocking using exclusively pseudocontact shifts.

Authors:  Christophe Schmitz; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-03

10.  Molecular architecture of the yeast Mediator complex.

Authors:  Philip J Robinson; Michael J Trnka; Riccardo Pellarin; Charles H Greenberg; David A Bushnell; Ralph Davis; Alma L Burlingame; Andrej Sali; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  HSP40 proteins use class-specific regulation to drive HSP70 functional diversity.

Authors:  Ofrah Faust; Meital Abayev-Avraham; Anne S Wentink; Michael Maurer; Nadinath B Nillegoda; Nir London; Bernd Bukau; Rina Rosenzweig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Characterizing conformational ensembles of multi-domain proteins using anisotropic paramagnetic NMR restraints.

Authors:  Xue-Ni Hou; Hidehito Tochio
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data.

Authors:  Davide Sala; Diego Del Alamo; Hassane S Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 5.  Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.

Authors:  Minh H Tran; Clara T Schoeder; Kevin L Schey; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Christoph Nitsche; Henry Orton; Mark Overhand; Gottfried Otting; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 7.  Paramagnetic NMR in drug discovery.

Authors:  Charlotte A Softley; Mark J Bostock; Grzegorz M Popowicz; Michael Sattler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 8.  Structural proteomics, electron cryo-microscopy and structural modeling approaches in bacteria-human protein interactions.

Authors:  Sounak Chowdhury; Lotta Happonen; Hamed Khakzad; Lars Malmström; Johan Malmström
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Ensuring scientific reproducibility in bio-macromolecular modeling via extensive, automated benchmarks.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Sergey Lyskov; Steven M Lewis; Jared Adolf-Bryfogle; Rebecca F Alford; Kyle Barlow; Ziv Ben-Aharon; Daniel Farrell; Jason Fell; William A Hansen; Ameya Harmalkar; Jeliazko Jeliazkov; Georg Kuenze; Justyna D Krys; Ajasja Ljubetič; Amanda L Loshbaugh; Jack Maguire; Rocco Moretti; Vikram Khipple Mulligan; Morgan L Nance; Phuong T Nguyen; Shane Ó Conchúir; Shourya S Roy Burman; Rituparna Samanta; Shannon T Smith; Frank Teets; Johanna K S Tiemann; Andrew Watkins; Hope Woods; Brahm J Yachnin; Christopher D Bahl; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; David Baker; Rhiju Das; Frank DiMaio; Sagar D Khare; Tanja Kortemme; Jason W Labonte; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Jens Meiler; William Schief; Ora Schueler-Furman; Justin B Siegel; Amelie Stein; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Brian Kuhlman; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Dominik Gront; Jeffrey J Gray; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Brian D Weitzner; Steven M Lewis; Jared Adolf-Bryfogle; Nawsad Alam; Rebecca F Alford; Melanie Aprahamian; David Baker; Kyle A Barlow; Patrick Barth; Benjamin Basanta; Brian J Bender; Kristin Blacklock; Jaume Bonet; Scott E Boyken; Phil Bradley; Chris Bystroff; Patrick Conway; Seth Cooper; Bruno E Correia; Brian Coventry; Rhiju Das; René M De Jong; Frank DiMaio; Lorna Dsilva; Roland Dunbrack; Alexander S Ford; Brandon Frenz; Darwin Y Fu; Caleb Geniesse; Lukasz Goldschmidt; Ragul Gowthaman; Jeffrey J Gray; Dominik Gront; Sharon Guffy; Scott Horowitz; Po-Ssu Huang; Thomas Huber; Tim M Jacobs; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; David K Johnson; Kalli Kappel; John Karanicolas; Hamed Khakzad; Karen R Khar; Sagar D Khare; Firas Khatib; Alisa Khramushin; Indigo C King; Robert Kleffner; Brian Koepnick; Tanja Kortemme; Georg Kuenze; Brian Kuhlman; Daisuke Kuroda; Jason W Labonte; Jason K Lai; Gideon Lapidoth; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Steffen Lindert; Thomas Linsky; Nir London; Joseph H Lubin; Sergey Lyskov; Jack Maguire; Lars Malmström; Enrique Marcos; Orly Marcu; Nicholas A Marze; Jens Meiler; Rocco Moretti; Vikram Khipple Mulligan; Santrupti Nerli; Christoffer Norn; Shane Ó'Conchúir; Noah Ollikainen; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Michael S Pacella; Xingjie Pan; Hahnbeom Park; Ryan E Pavlovicz; Manasi Pethe; Brian G Pierce; Kala Bharath Pilla; Barak Raveh; P Douglas Renfrew; Shourya S Roy Burman; Aliza Rubenstein; Marion F Sauer; Andreas Scheck; William Schief; Ora Schueler-Furman; Yuval Sedan; Alexander M Sevy; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Lei Shi; Justin B Siegel; Daniel-Adriano Silva; Shannon Smith; Yifan Song; Amelie Stein; Maria Szegedy; Frank D Teets; Summer B Thyme; Ray Yu-Ruei Wang; Andrew Watkins; Lior Zimmerman; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.