Literature DB >> 11200525

De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

P M Bowers1, C E Strauss, D Baker.   

Abstract

We describe a method for generating moderate to high-resolution protein structures using limited NMR data combined with the ab initio protein structure prediction method Rosetta. Peptide fragments are selected from proteins of known structure based on sequence similarity and consistency with chemical shift and NOE data. Models are built from these fragments by minimizing an energy function that favors hydrophobic burial, strand pairing, and satisfaction of NOE constraints. Models generated using this procedure with approximately 1 NOE constraint per residue are in some cases closer to the corresponding X-ray structures than the published NMR solution structures. The method requires only the sparse constraints available during initial stages of NMR structure determination, and thus holds promise for increasing the speed with which protein solution structures can be determined.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200525     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026744431105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  15 in total

1.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA.

Authors:  K T Simons; R Bonneau; I Ruczinski; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; M L Raves; T Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics.

Authors:  E A Merritt; M E Murphy
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1994-11-01

5.  MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints.

Authors:  J Skolnick; A Kolinski; A R Ortiz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-01-17       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Kooperberg; E Huang; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology.

Authors:  G Cornilescu; F Delaglio; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  High throughput protein fold identification by using experimental constraints derived from intramolecular cross-links and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M M Young; N Tang; J C Hempel; C M Oshiro; E W Taylor; I D Kuntz; B W Gibson; G Dollinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Selective methyl group protonation of perdeuterated proteins.

Authors:  M K Rosen; K H Gardner; R C Willis; W E Parris; T Pawson; L E Kay
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A branch and bound algorithm for protein structure refinement from sparse NMR data sets.

Authors:  D M Standley; V A Eyrich; A K Felts; R A Friesner; A E McDermott
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  78 in total

1.  Exact solutions for chemical bond orientations from residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  William J Wedemeyer; Carol A Rohl; Harold A Scherag
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Protein backbone structure determination using only residual dipolar couplings from one ordering medium.

Authors:  M Andrec; P Du; R M Levy
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Secondary chemical shifts in immobilized peptides and proteins: a qualitative basis for structure refinement under magic angle spinning.

Authors:  S Luca; D V Filippov; J H van Boom; H Oschkinat; H J de Groot; M Baldus
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  EM-fold: de novo atomic-detail protein structure determination from medium-resolution density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Nathan Alexander; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Determination of protein global folds using backbone residual dipolar coupling and long-range NOE restraints.

Authors:  Alexander W Giesen; Steve W Homans; Jonathan Miles Brown
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 7.  Applications of NMR to structure-based drug design in structural genomics.

Authors:  Robert Powers
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2002

8.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server.

Authors:  David E Kim; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Wei Li; Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.