Literature DB >> 14668443

Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data.

Jens Meiler1, David Baker.   

Abstract

Experimental structure determination by x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy is slow and time-consuming compared with the rate at which new protein sequences are being identified. NMR spectroscopy has the advantage of rapidly providing the structurally relevant information in the form of unassigned chemical shifts (CSs), intensities of NOESY crosspeaks [nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs)], and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs), but use of these data are limited by the time and effort needed to assign individual resonances to specific atoms. Here, we develop a method for generating low-resolution protein structures by using unassigned NMR data that relies on the de novo protein structure prediction algorithm, rosetta [Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E. & Baker, D. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 268, 209-225] and a Monte Carlo procedure that searches for the assignment of resonances to atoms that produces the best fit of the experimental NMR data to a candidate 3D structure. A large ensemble of models is generated from sequence information alone by using rosetta, an optimal assignment is identified for each model, and the models are then ranked based on their fit with the NMR data assuming the identified assignments. The method was tested on nine protein sequences between 56 and 140 amino acids and published CS, NOE, and RDC data. The procedure yielded models with rms deviations between 3 and 6 A, and, in four of the nine cases, the partial assignments obtained by the method could be used to refine the structures to high resolution (0.6-1.8 A) by repeated cycles of structure generation guided by the partial assignments, followed by reassignment using the newly generated models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668443      PMCID: PMC307580          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2434121100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A new approach for applying residual dipolar couplings as restraints in structure elucidation.

Authors:  J Meiler; N Blomberg; M Nilges; C Griesinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  De novo determination of protein structure by NMR using orientational and long-range order restraints.

Authors:  J C Hus; D Marion; M Blackledge
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

Authors:  P M Bowers; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  The use of dipolar couplings for determining the solution structure of rat apo-S100B(betabeta).

Authors:  A C Drohat; N Tjandra; D M Baldisseri; D J Weber
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  DipoCoup: A versatile program for 3D-structure homology comparison based on residual dipolar couplings and pseudocontact shifts.

Authors:  J Meiler; W Peti; C Griesinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Solution structure of DinI provides insight into its mode of RecA inactivation.

Authors:  B E Ramirez; O N Voloshin; R D Camerini-Otero; A Bax
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  High precision solution structure of the C-terminal KH domain of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K, a c-myc transcription factor.

Authors:  J L Baber; D Libutti; D Levens; N Tjandra
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  RFAC, a program for automated NMR R-factor estimation.

Authors:  W Gronwald; R Kirchhöfer; A Görler; W Kremer; B Ganslmeier; K P Neidig; H R Kalbitzer
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Structure of the GAF domain, a ubiquitous signaling motif and a new class of cyclic GMP receptor.

Authors:  Y S Ho; L M Burden; J H Hurley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  51 in total

1.  EM-fold: de novo atomic-detail protein structure determination from medium-resolution density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Nathan Alexander; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server.

Authors:  David E Kim; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A Bayesian approach for determining protein side-chain rotamer conformations using unassigned NOE data.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Kyle E Roberts; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information.

Authors:  James M Thompson; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Gaohua Liu; Paolo Rossi; Yuefeng Tang; Jeffrey L Mills; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Automated protein structure calculation from NMR data.

Authors:  Mike P Williamson; C Jeremy Craven
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Matthew J O'Meara; Mike Tyka; Ron Jacak; Yifan Song; Elizabeth H Kellogg; James Thompson; Ian W Davis; Roland A Pache; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; Tanja Kortemme; Jane S Richardson; James J Havranek; Jack Snoeyink; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  The activity of prolactin releasing peptide correlates with its helicity.

Authors:  Stephanie H Deluca; Daniel Rathmann; Annette G Beck-Sickinger; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  EM-fold: De novo folding of alpha-helical proteins guided by intermediate-resolution electron microscopy density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; René Staritzbichler; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.