Literature DB >> 21200195

Are patients making high-quality decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? [outcomes article].

Clara N Lee1, Jeff Belkora, Yuchiao Chang, Beverly Moy, Ann Partridge, Karen Sepucha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variation in rates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy has raised concerns about the quality of decisions about reconstruction. The authors sought to evaluate patient decision making about reconstruction, using a validated measure of knowledge and preferences related to reconstruction.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of early-stage breast cancer survivors from four university medical centers was conducted. The survey included measures of knowledge about specific reconstruction facts, personal goals and concerns, and involvement in decision making. A multivariable linear regression model of characteristics associated with knowledge and a logistic regression model of factors associated with having reconstruction were developed.
RESULTS: A total of 84 patients participated (59 percent response rate). Participants answered 37.9 percent of knowledge questions correctly. Higher education (beta, 15 percent; p = 0.003) and having reconstruction (beta, 21 percent; p < 0.0001) were associated with higher knowledge. The goals "use your own tissue to make a breast" (odds ratio, 1.53; 95 percent CI, 1.15, 2.05) and "wake up after mastectomy with reconstruction underway" (odds ratio, 1.66; 95 percent CI, 1.30, 2.12) were associated with reconstruction. The goal "avoid putting foreign material in your body" was associated with no reconstruction (odds ratio, 0.64; 95 percent CI, 0.48, 0.86). Most patients reported they mainly made the decision or made the decision with the doctor equally (93 percent; 95 percent CI, 85 to 97 percent) and that their degree of involvement was about right (85 percent; 95 percent CI, 75 to 91 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with mastectomy in this study were not well-informed about breast reconstruction. Treatments were associated with patients' goals and concerns, however, and patients were highly involved in their decisions. Knowledge deficits suggest that breast cancer patients would benefit from interventions to support their decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21200195      PMCID: PMC4100583          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f958de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  23 in total

1.  Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Floyd J Fowler; Albert G Mulley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L Fallowfield
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997-03

4.  Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Y Godwin
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2000-03

5.  A measure of knowledge and confidence in relation to HIV and AIDS: reliability and validity.

Authors:  E Ferguson; T Cox; K Irving; M Leiter; B Farnsworth
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  1995

6.  Patterns of care for immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mary J Nissen; Karen K Swenson; Elizabeth A Kind
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population- based study.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Mahasin S Mujahid; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Judy Y Chen; Jennifer Malin; Patricia A Ganz; Clifford Ko; Diana Tisnado; May Lin Tao; Martha Timmer; John L Adams; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation.

Authors:  M M Hutson; J D Blaha
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  19 in total

1.  How Informed Is the Decision About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy?: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Peter Anthony Ubel; Allison M Deal; Lillian Burdick Blizard; Karen R Sepucha; David W Ollila; Michael Patrick Pignone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice.

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan Brennan; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shreya Raman; Lauren E Powell; Emily S Andersen; Lauren C Nigro
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Met and Unmet Expectations for Breast Reconstruction in Early Posttreatment Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Laurie E Steffen; Aimee Johnson; Beverly J Levine; Deborah K Mayer; Nancy E Avis
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  2017 Oct/Dec

6.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Authors:  Ryan C DeCoster; Robert-Marlo F Bautista; Jack C Burns; Adam J Dugan; R Wesley Edmunds; Brian D Rinker; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Quality of Patient Decisions About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Allison M Deal; Ruth Huh; Peter Anthony Ubel; Yuen-Jong Liu; Lillian Blizard; Caprice Hunt; Michael Patrick Pignone
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program.

Authors:  Jeff Belkora; Shelley Volz; Meredith Loth; Alexandra Teng; Margot Zarin-Pass; Dan Moore; Laura Esserman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Accuracy of Predictions of Patients With Breast Cancer of Future Well-being After Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Michael Patrick Pignone; Allison M Deal; Lillian Blizard; Caprice Hunt; Ruth Huh; Yuen-Jong Liu; Peter Anthony Ubel
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  A Qualitative Assessment of the Journey to Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho Man Cheng; Catherine McMillan; Joan E Lipa; Laura Snell
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.