Literature DB >> 21617423

Breast reconstruction after breast cancer.

Joseph M Serletti1, Joshua Fosnot, Jonas A Nelson, Joseph J Disa, Louis P Bucky.   

Abstract

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the mental, emotional, and physical benefits of reconstruction in breast cancer patients. 2. Compare the most common techniques of reconstruction in patients and detail benefits and risks associated with each. 3. Outline different methods of reconstruction and identify the method considered best for the patient based on timing of the procedures, body type, adjuvant therapies, and other coexisting conditions. 4. Distinguish between some of the different flaps that can be considered for autologous reconstruction.
SUMMARY: Breast cancer is unfortunately a common disease affecting millions of women, often at a relatively young age. Reconstruction following mastectomy offers women an opportunity to mollify some of the emotional and aesthetic effects of this devastating disease. Although varying techniques of alloplastic and autologous techniques are available, all strive to achieve the same goal: the satisfactory reformation of a breast mound that appears as natural as possible without clothing and at the very least is normal in appearance under clothing. This article summarizes the various approaches to breast reconstruction and offers a balanced view of the risks and benefits of each, all of which in the end offer the opportunity for excellent and predictable results with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617423     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318213a2e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  33 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Harless; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 3. 

Authors:  Ron B Somogyi; Natalia Ziolkowski; Fahima Osman; Alexandra Ginty; Mitchell Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Authors:  Ryan C DeCoster; Robert-Marlo F Bautista; Jack C Burns; Adam J Dugan; R Wesley Edmunds; Brian D Rinker; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Breast reconstruction: Updated overview for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Ron B Somogyi; Natalia Ziolkowski; Fahima Osman; Alexandra Ginty; Mitchell Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Samuel J Lin; Adam M Tobias; Sylvain Gioux; Amaan Mazhar; David J Cuccia; Yoshitomo Ashitate; Alan Stockdale; Rafiou Oketokoun; Nicholas J Durr; Lorissa A Moffitt; Anthony J Durkin; Bruce J Tromberg; John V Frangioni; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Factors Associated with Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anita R Kulkarni; Andrea L Pusic; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin G Wilkins; Randy S Roth
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2016-09-15

9.  Prevalence and Predictors of Postdischarge Antibiotic Use Following Mastectomy.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Victoria J Fraser; Anna E Wallace; David K Warren
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Comparison of Wound Complications After Immediate, Delayed, and Secondary Breast Reconstruction Procedures.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.