Literature DB >> 25141939

Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making.

Monica Morrow1, Yun Li2, Amy K Alderman3, Reshma Jagsi4, Ann S Hamilton5, John J Graff6, Sarah T Hawley7, Steven J Katz8.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Most women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer do not undergo breast reconstruction.
OBJECTIVE: To examine correlates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and to determine if a significant unmet need for reconstruction exists. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from Los Angeles, California, and Detroit, Michigan, for rapid case ascertainment to identify a sample of women aged 20 to 79 years diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ or stages I to III invasive breast cancer. Black and Latina women were oversampled to ensure adequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities. Eligible participants were able to complete a survey in English or Spanish. Of 3252 women sent the initial survey a median of 9 months after diagnosis, 2290 completed it. Those who remained disease free were surveyed 4 years later to determine the frequency of immediate and delayed reconstruction and patient attitudes toward the procedure; 1536 completed the follow-up survey. The 485 who remained disease free at follow-up underwent analysis. EXPOSURES: Disease-free survival of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast reconstruction at any time after mastectomy and patient satisfaction with different aspects of the reconstruction decision-making process.
RESULTS: Response rates in the initial and follow-up surveys were 73.1% and 67.7%, respectively (overall, 49.4%). Of 485 patients reporting mastectomy at the initial survey and remaining disease free, 24.8% underwent immediate and 16.8% underwent delayed reconstruction (total, 41.6%). Factors significantly associated with not undergoing reconstruction were black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.16 [95% CI, 1.11-4.20]; P = .004), lower educational level (AOR, 4.49 [95% CI, 2.31-8.72]; P < .001), increased age (AOR in 10-year increments, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.77-3.61]; P < .001), major comorbidity (AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.11]; P = .048), and chemotherapy (AOR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; P = .05). Only 13.3% of women were dissatisfied with the reconstruction decision-making process, but dissatisfaction was higher among nonwhite patients in the sample (AOR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.27-6.51]; P = .03). The most common patient-reported reasons for not having reconstruction were the desire to avoid additional surgery (48.5%) and the belief that it was not important (33.8%), but 36.3% expressed fear of implants. Reasons for avoiding reconstruction and systems barriers to care varied by race; barriers were more common among nonwhite participants. Residual demand for reconstruction at 4 years was low, with only 30 of 263 who did not undergo reconstruction still considering the procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reconstruction rates largely reflect patient demand; most patients are satisfied with the decision-making process about reconstruction. Specific approaches are needed to address lingering patient-level and system factors with a negative effect on reconstruction among minority women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25141939      PMCID: PMC4732701          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  18 in total

1.  Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: do women revisit the decision?

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Barbara Salem; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven Katz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The effect of system-level access factors on receipt of reconstruction among Latina and white women with DCIS.

Authors:  Celia Patricia Kaplan; Leah S Karliner; E Shelley Hwang; Joan Bloom; Susan Stewart; Dana Nickleach; Jessica Quinn; Angela Thrasher; Anna Maria Nápoles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Melissa E Hughes; Stephen B Edge; Richard Theriault; John L Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California.

Authors:  Laura Kruper; Alicia Holt; Xin Xin Xu; Lei Duan; Katherine Henderson; Leslie Bernstein; Joshua Ellenhorn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer Waljee; Mahasin Mujahid; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Steven J Kronowitz; Charlotte C Sun; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; Lisa A Newman; S Eva Singletary; Nadeem Q Mirza; Frederick C Ames; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Geoffrey L Robb; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Multilevel analysis of the impact of community vs patient factors on access to immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  Gedge D Rosson; Navin K Singh; Nita Ahuja; Lisa K Jacobs; David C Chang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11

10.  Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Andrea L Pusic; Lisa Sclafani; Claire Buchanan; Jane V Fey; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  49 in total

1.  Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Complications and thromboembolic events associated with tamoxifen therapy in patients with breast cancer undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv P Parikh; Elizabeth B Odom; Liyang Yu; Graham A Colditz; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Understanding and Optimizing the Patient Experience in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Tiffany N S Ballard; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Xiaoxue Chen; Anne Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  How Informed Is the Decision About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy?: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Peter Anthony Ubel; Allison M Deal; Lillian Burdick Blizard; Karen R Sepucha; David W Ollila; Michael Patrick Pignone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The Impact of Travel Distance on Breast Reconstruction in the United States.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Wess A Cohen; Shantanu N Razdan; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

8.  Met and Unmet Expectations for Breast Reconstruction in Early Posttreatment Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Laurie E Steffen; Aimee Johnson; Beverly J Levine; Deborah K Mayer; Nancy E Avis
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  2017 Oct/Dec

9.  Barriers to Completing Delayed Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: a Critical Need for Patient and Clinician Education.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ogrodnik; Susan MacLennan; Donald Weaver; Ted James
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  Persistent Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction and Strategies for Mitigation.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Martin P Morris; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.