Monica Morrow1, Yun Li2, Amy K Alderman3, Reshma Jagsi4, Ann S Hamilton5, John J Graff6, Sarah T Hawley7, Steven J Katz8. 1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. The Swan Center for Plastic Surgery, Alpharetta, Georgia. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 7. Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan8Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor9School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 8. Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Most women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer do not undergo breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To examine correlates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and to determine if a significant unmet need for reconstruction exists. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from Los Angeles, California, and Detroit, Michigan, for rapid case ascertainment to identify a sample of women aged 20 to 79 years diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ or stages I to III invasive breast cancer. Black and Latina women were oversampled to ensure adequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities. Eligible participants were able to complete a survey in English or Spanish. Of 3252 women sent the initial survey a median of 9 months after diagnosis, 2290 completed it. Those who remained disease free were surveyed 4 years later to determine the frequency of immediate and delayed reconstruction and patient attitudes toward the procedure; 1536 completed the follow-up survey. The 485 who remained disease free at follow-up underwent analysis. EXPOSURES: Disease-free survival of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast reconstruction at any time after mastectomy and patient satisfaction with different aspects of the reconstruction decision-making process. RESULTS: Response rates in the initial and follow-up surveys were 73.1% and 67.7%, respectively (overall, 49.4%). Of 485 patients reporting mastectomy at the initial survey and remaining disease free, 24.8% underwent immediate and 16.8% underwent delayed reconstruction (total, 41.6%). Factors significantly associated with not undergoing reconstruction were black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.16 [95% CI, 1.11-4.20]; P = .004), lower educational level (AOR, 4.49 [95% CI, 2.31-8.72]; P < .001), increased age (AOR in 10-year increments, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.77-3.61]; P < .001), major comorbidity (AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.11]; P = .048), and chemotherapy (AOR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; P = .05). Only 13.3% of women were dissatisfied with the reconstruction decision-making process, but dissatisfaction was higher among nonwhite patients in the sample (AOR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.27-6.51]; P = .03). The most common patient-reported reasons for not having reconstruction were the desire to avoid additional surgery (48.5%) and the belief that it was not important (33.8%), but 36.3% expressed fear of implants. Reasons for avoiding reconstruction and systems barriers to care varied by race; barriers were more common among nonwhite participants. Residual demand for reconstruction at 4 years was low, with only 30 of 263 who did not undergo reconstruction still considering the procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reconstruction rates largely reflect patient demand; most patients are satisfied with the decision-making process about reconstruction. Specific approaches are needed to address lingering patient-level and system factors with a negative effect on reconstruction among minority women.
IMPORTANCE: Most women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer do not undergo breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To examine correlates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and to determine if a significant unmet need for reconstruction exists. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from Los Angeles, California, and Detroit, Michigan, for rapid case ascertainment to identify a sample of women aged 20 to 79 years diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ or stages I to III invasive breast cancer. Black and Latina women were oversampled to ensure adequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities. Eligible participants were able to complete a survey in English or Spanish. Of 3252 women sent the initial survey a median of 9 months after diagnosis, 2290 completed it. Those who remained disease free were surveyed 4 years later to determine the frequency of immediate and delayed reconstruction and patient attitudes toward the procedure; 1536 completed the follow-up survey. The 485 who remained disease free at follow-up underwent analysis. EXPOSURES: Disease-free survival of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast reconstruction at any time after mastectomy and patient satisfaction with different aspects of the reconstruction decision-making process. RESULTS: Response rates in the initial and follow-up surveys were 73.1% and 67.7%, respectively (overall, 49.4%). Of 485 patients reporting mastectomy at the initial survey and remaining disease free, 24.8% underwent immediate and 16.8% underwent delayed reconstruction (total, 41.6%). Factors significantly associated with not undergoing reconstruction were black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.16 [95% CI, 1.11-4.20]; P = .004), lower educational level (AOR, 4.49 [95% CI, 2.31-8.72]; P < .001), increased age (AOR in 10-year increments, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.77-3.61]; P < .001), major comorbidity (AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.11]; P = .048), and chemotherapy (AOR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; P = .05). Only 13.3% of women were dissatisfied with the reconstruction decision-making process, but dissatisfaction was higher among nonwhite patients in the sample (AOR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.27-6.51]; P = .03). The most common patient-reported reasons for not having reconstruction were the desire to avoid additional surgery (48.5%) and the belief that it was not important (33.8%), but 36.3% expressed fear of implants. Reasons for avoiding reconstruction and systems barriers to care varied by race; barriers were more common among nonwhite participants. Residual demand for reconstruction at 4 years was low, with only 30 of 263 who did not undergo reconstruction still considering the procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reconstruction rates largely reflect patient demand; most patients are satisfied with the decision-making process about reconstruction. Specific approaches are needed to address lingering patient-level and system factors with a negative effect on reconstruction among minority women.
Authors: Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Barbara Salem; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven Katz Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Monica Morrow; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Steven J Katz Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Celia Patricia Kaplan; Leah S Karliner; E Shelley Hwang; Joan Bloom; Susan Stewart; Dana Nickleach; Jessica Quinn; Angela Thrasher; Anna Maria Nápoles Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Melissa E Hughes; Stephen B Edge; Richard Theriault; John L Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce Niland; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer Waljee; Mahasin Mujahid; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Steven J Kronowitz; Charlotte C Sun; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; Lisa A Newman; S Eva Singletary; Nadeem Q Mirza; Frederick C Ames; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Geoffrey L Robb; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Colleen M McCarthy; Andrea L Pusic; Lisa Sclafani; Claire Buchanan; Jane V Fey; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Rajiv P Parikh; Elizabeth B Odom; Liyang Yu; Graham A Colditz; Terence M Myckatyn Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Wess A Cohen; Tiffany N S Ballard; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Xiaoxue Chen; Anne Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Peter Anthony Ubel; Allison M Deal; Lillian Burdick Blizard; Karen R Sepucha; David W Ollila; Michael Patrick Pignone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Claudia R Albornoz; Wess A Cohen; Shantanu N Razdan; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.730