Literature DB >> 9682639

A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

G E Spyrou1, O G Titley, J Cerqueiro, M F Fatah.   

Abstract

Within the last 15-20 years there have been many changes in the management of breast cancer. Along with changes in treatment, possibilities for breast reconstruction have become increasingly sophisticated and commonplace. Despite the availability of breast reconstruction, we have noted large variations in referral patterns. Because the surgical treatment of breast cancer is largely undertaken by general surgeons, we investigated general surgeons' attitudes towards reconstruction using a postal questionnaire. In 1995, a questionnaire involving hypothetical criticisms was sent to general surgical members of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. A total of 136 surgeons responded, 79 (58%) of whom had a specialist interest in breast cancer. Each surgeon saw an average of 68 new cases of breast cancer per year (range 0-400). The general surgeons were concerned about three areas: (1) 32.3% felt that breast reconstruction might adversely delay the detection of local recurrence; (2) 16.6% were worried that breast reconstruction has high morbidity; and (3) 17.4% said that patients did not want breast reconstruction despite being advised of its availability. To investigate these concern's further, an extensive literature search was undertaken. There is no evidence that breast reconstruction delays the detection of local recurrence. With appropriate patient selection, the morbidity of reconstructive options appears very acceptable. Finally, immediate breast reconstruction has psychological benefits when compared with delayed reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9682639      PMCID: PMC2503029     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; B Baldwin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Postmastectomy attitudes in women who wear external breast prostheses compared to those who have undergone breast reconstructions.

Authors:  L L Reaby; L K Hort
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1995-02

Review 3.  Conceptual considerations in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  R W Burk; J C Grotting
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 4.  The pedicled TRAM as preference for immediate autogenous tissue breast reconstruction.

Authors:  M E Beasley
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 5.  Free TRAM. Results and abdominal wall function.

Authors:  A M Feller
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Can breast reconstruction with gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of death and second primary cancer in patients treated by mastectomy for breast cancer?

Authors:  J Y Petit; M G Lê; H Mouriesse; M Rietjens; P Gill; G Contesso; A Lehmann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Postmastectomy complications in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  L D Crespo; T J Eberlein; N O'Connor; C A Hergrueter; J J Pribaz; E Eriksson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy.

Authors:  L L Reaby; L K Hort; J Vandervord
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

9.  Breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Noda; T J Eberlein; E Eriksson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Late results and current indications of latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions.

Authors:  A De Mey; M Lejour; A Declety; A M Meythiaz
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1991-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Authors:  Ryan C DeCoster; Robert-Marlo F Bautista; Jack C Burns; Adam J Dugan; R Wesley Edmunds; Brian D Rinker; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Is mastectomy with immediate reconstruction safe for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy? A nationwide study from Korean Breast Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sungmin Park; Joon Jeong; Wonshik Han; Young Joo Lee; Hyun-Ah Kim; Seokwon Lee; Kyung Do Byun; Young Jin Choi; Jiyoung Kim; Soo Youn Bae
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  The effect of lipoaspirates vs. dissected abdominal fat on breast cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Faris Almarzouqi; Hans-Oliver Rennekampff; Jan-Philipp Stromps; Ziyad Alharbi; Norbert Pallua
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  The attitude and perception of breast reconstruction by general surgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Basim A Awan; Osama A Samargandi; Saleh M Aldaqal; Ahmed M Alharbi; Zuhoor Alghaithi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.