| Literature DB >> 31480794 |
Maria Chiara Mentella1, Franco Scaldaferri2, Caterina Ricci3, Antonio Gasbarrini2, Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano4.
Abstract
The Mediterranean diet is considered one of the most worldwide healthy dietary patterns thanks to a combination of foods rich mainly in antioxidants and anti-inflammatory nutrients. Many studies have demonstrated a strong and inverse relationship between a high level of Mediterranean diet adherence and some chronic diseases (such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, etc.) and cancer. Given its protective effects in reducing oxidative and inflammatory processes of cells and avoiding DNA damages, cell proliferation, and their survival, angiogenesis, inflammations and metastasis, the Mediterranean diet is considered a powerful and manageable method to fight cancer incidence. The aim of this narrative review was to determine the magnitude of interaction between the Mediterranean diet and more widespread types of cancer so as to give a first and useful overview on this relationship identifying, with a nutritional approach, those nutrients of Mediterranean diet able to reduce cancer incidence.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; cancer; cancer incidence
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480794 PMCID: PMC6770822 DOI: 10.3390/nu11092059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Article selection process. Note: Papers with significant relationship were reported in bibliography together with the other articles considered to describe the whole topic.
Figure 2Mediterranean diet pyramid. Source: Fundacion Dieta Mediterrànea.
Figure 3Double Pyramid proposed by Barilla Centre for Food and Nutrition—Source: Barilla Center For Food and Nutrition (https://www.barillacfn.com/en/dissemination/double_pyramid/).
Figure 4Cancers linked with obesity or overweight—Source information: Lauby-Secretan et al. (2016) [86].
Figure 5Exposome—Characteristics extracted by Mayne et al. (2016).
Figure 6Mechanism between Mediterranean diet components and beneficial effects—Source information: Lăcătușu et al. (2019).
Summary of studies reviewed and relationships with statistical significance between MD score and breast cancer.
| Study | Study Characteristics | MD Adherence | Objective | Statistical Method | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buckland [ | Prospective Study | arMED | Incidence of cancer | Cox proportional hazard regression model | HRarMEDhigh vs. arMEDlow = 0.94 (0.88–1.00) |
| Van den Brandt [ | Prospective Study | Mediterranean Diet Score | Incidence of cancer | Cox proportional hazard regression model | HRMD high vs. MD low = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39–0.93 |
| Turati [ | Prospective Study | Mediterranean Diet Score | Incidence of cancer | Logistic regression | ORMDS=4-5 vs. MDS=0-3 = 0.86 (0.76–0.98) |
Summary of studies reviewed and relationships with statistical significance between MD score and colorectal cancer.
| Study | Study Characteristics | MD Adherence | Objective | Statistical Method | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castello [ | Multicase-control study | A posteriori score | Incidence of cancer | Logistic regression | Men: ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.71 (0.55–0.92) |
| Fliss-Isakov [ | Case-control study | A posteriori score | Incidence of cancer | Multivariate logistic regression | ORMDS = 3-4 = 0.34 (0.17–0.65), ORMDS = 5-7 = 0.22 (0.11–0.43); ORMDS = 8-10 = 0.18 (0.07–0.47) |
| Rosato [ | Case-control study | Mediterranean Diet Score | Incidence of cancer | Unconditional logistic regression | OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86–0.91 (for each 1-point increase of MD) |
| Ratjen [ | Prospective cohort study | A posteriori score | Mortality rate in CRC patients | Cox proportional hazard regression model | HRhighest quartile vs. lowest quartile = 0.48 (0.32–0.74) |
Summary of studies reviewed and relationships with statistical significance between MD score and prostate cancer.
| Study | Study Characteristics | MD Adherence Measurement | Objective | Statistical Method | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider [ | Prospective study | Mediterranean Diet Score | Incidence of cancer | Multivariate logistic regression | ORhigh score vs. low score = 0.66 (0.46–0.95) |
| Kenfield [ | Prospective study | Mediterranean Diet Score | Mortality rate in patients without metastasis | Cox proportional hazard regression model | HR = 0.78 (0.67–0.90) |
| Russo [ | Case-control | MEDILITE score | Incidence of cancer | Multivariate logistic regression | OR = 0.86 (0.77–0.96) (for each 1-point increase of MD score) |
Elements linked with Mediterranean Food, effect of elements on cancer and cancer risk for each element.
| Typical Foods | Elements | Function | Cancer |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Antioxidants and micronutrients (carotenoids, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, dietary fiber, dithiolthiones, glucosinates, polyphenols, protease inhibitors, allium compounds, plant sterols, and limonene) | Anti-tumorigenic effect | Less risk of: |
|
| Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid | Reducing tumor cell growth | Less risk of: |
| Heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons may be formed when fish is cooked on a grill or barbecue | Production of mutagenic chemicals | High risk of stomach cancer | |
|
| Polyphenols (oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol) | Antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory and anti-mutagenic effects | Less risk of: |
| Oleic acid, poly unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), low n-6 PUFA/n-3 PUFA ratio | Chemoprotective effect | ||
|
| Heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formed when meat is cooked at high temperatures | Carcinogens | High risk of: |
| Haem iron, present in high level | Promotion of tumorigenesis by stimulating the endogenous formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds | ||
| High-temperature cooking of red and processed meats may enhance production of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). | Produce several cancer-promoting effects | High risk of pancreatic cancer | |
| Consumption of meat may lead to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, promoting growth of cancer cells | Promoting growth of cancer cells | ||
|
| Provide various nutrients: vitamin E, selenium, copper, zinc and bioactive non-nutrient compounds (lignans, phytoestrogens, and phenolic compounds), and dietary fiber | Anti-carcinogenic properties, as anti-oxidative activity | Less risk of: |
| Aflatoxin (mycotoxin produced by molds of the Aspergillus species) | High mutation load in TP3 | High risk of liver cancer | |
|
| Calcium, lactic acid-producing bacteria, vitamin D, linoleic acids, lactoferrin, | Inhibit tumor development | Less risk of: |
| High level of calcium | Downregulating the formation of the biologically active form of vitamin D → increasing cellular proliferation | Higher risk of prostate cancer | |
|
| Phytoalexin presents in grape skin | Antioxidant and cancer chemo preventive agent → inhibiting tumor initiation, promotion and progression | Controversial results about impact |
| Resveratrol and quercetin | Modulating cell cycle-regulating proteins |
Information source: World Cancer Research Fund and Grosso et al. (2013).