Patrick Maisonneuve1, Nitin Shivappa2,3, James R Hébert2,3, Massimo Bellomi4,5, Cristiano Rampinelli4, Raffaella Bertolotti6, Lorenzo Spaggiari5,6, Domenico Palli7, Giulia Veronesi8, Patrizia Gnagnarella9. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ramusio 1, 20141, Milan, Italy. patrick.maisonneuve@ieo.it. 2. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. 4. Division of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 6. Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. 7. Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy. 8. Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. 9. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ramusio 1, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test whether the inflammatory potential of diet, as measured using the dietary inflammatory index (DII), is associated with risk of lung cancer or other respiratory conditions and to compare results obtained with those based on the aMED score, an established dietary index that measures adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet. METHODS: In 4336 heavy smokers enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized lung cancer screening program, we measured participants' diets at baseline using a self-administered food frequency questionnaire from which dietary scores were calculated. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess association between the dietary indices and lung cancer diagnosed during annual screening, and other respiratory outcomes that were recorded at baseline, respectively. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, adjusted for baseline lung cancer risk (estimated from age, sex, smoking history, and asbestos exposure) and total energy, both DII and aMED scores were associated with dyspnoea (p trend = 0.046 and 0.02, respectively) and radiological evidence of emphysema (p trend = 0.0002 and 0.02). After mutual adjustment of the two dietary scores, only the association between DII and radiological evidence of emphysema (Q4 vs. Q1, OR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.01-1.67, p trend = 0.012) remained statistically significant. At univariate analysis, both DII and aMED were associated with lung cancer risk, but in fully adjusted multivariate analysis, only the association with aMED remained statistically significant (p trend = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Among heavy smokers, a pro-inflammatory diet, as indicated by increasing DII score, is associated with dyspnoea and radiological evidence of emphysema. A traditional Mediterranean diet, which is associated with a lower DII, may lower lung cancer risk.
PURPOSE: To test whether the inflammatory potential of diet, as measured using the dietary inflammatory index (DII), is associated with risk of lung cancer or other respiratory conditions and to compare results obtained with those based on the aMED score, an established dietary index that measures adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet. METHODS: In 4336 heavy smokers enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized lung cancer screening program, we measured participants' diets at baseline using a self-administered food frequency questionnaire from which dietary scores were calculated. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess association between the dietary indices and lung cancer diagnosed during annual screening, and other respiratory outcomes that were recorded at baseline, respectively. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, adjusted for baseline lung cancer risk (estimated from age, sex, smoking history, and asbestos exposure) and total energy, both DII and aMED scores were associated with dyspnoea (p trend = 0.046 and 0.02, respectively) and radiological evidence of emphysema (p trend = 0.0002 and 0.02). After mutual adjustment of the two dietary scores, only the association between DII and radiological evidence of emphysema (Q4 vs. Q1, OR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.01-1.67, p trend = 0.012) remained statistically significant. At univariate analysis, both DII and aMED were associated with lung cancer risk, but in fully adjusted multivariate analysis, only the association with aMED remained statistically significant (p trend = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Among heavy smokers, a pro-inflammatory diet, as indicated by increasing DII score, is associated with dyspnoea and radiological evidence of emphysema. A traditional Mediterranean diet, which is associated with a lower DII, may lower lung cancer risk.
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Anna E Prizment; Cindy K Blair; David R Jacobs; Susan E Steck; James R Hébert Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Patrick Maisonneuve; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Massimo Bellomi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Giuseppe Pelosi; Cristiano Rampinelli; Raffaella Bertolotti; Nicole Rotmensz; John K Field; Andrea Decensi; Giulia Veronesi Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-08-02
Authors: W S Yang; M Y Wong; E Vogtmann; R Q Tang; L Xie; Y S Yang; Q J Wu; W Zhang; Y B Xiang Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Adrian D Wood; Anna A Strachan; Frank Thies; Lorna S Aucott; David M Reid; Antonia C Hardcastle; Alexandra Mavroeidi; William G Simpson; Garry G Duthie; Helen M Macdonald Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Frederike L Büchner; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Martine M Ros; Kim Overvad; Christina C Dahm; Louise Hansen; Anne Tjønneland; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Marina Touillaud; Rudolf Kaaks; Sabine Rohrmann; Heiner Boeing; Ute Nöthlings; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimosthenis Zylis; Vardis Dilis; Domenico Palli; Sabina Sieri; Paolo Vineis; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Petra H M Peeters; Carla H van Gils; Eiliv Lund; Inger T Gram; Tonje Braaten; María-José Sánchez; Antonio Agudo; Nerea Larrañaga; Eva Ardanaz; Carmen Navarro; Marcial V Argüelles; Jonas Manjer; Elisabet Wirfält; Göran Hallmans; Torgny Rasmuson; Tim J Key; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick Wareham; Nadia Slimani; Anne-Claire Vergnaud; Wei W Xun; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Elio Riboli Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gerald N Wogan; Stephen S Hecht; James S Felton; Allan H Conney; Lawrence A Loeb Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Kathryn M Rexrode; Christos S Mantzoros; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Susan E Steck; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hussey; Yunsheng Ma; Ira S Ockene; Fred Tabung; James R Hébert Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Andrea Schneider; James R Hébert; Wolfgang Koenig; Annette Peters; Barbara Thorand Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: M D Wirth; N Shivappa; L Davis; T G Hurley; A Ortaglia; R Drayton; S N Blair; J R Hébert Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Valentina Rosato; Werner Garavello; Diego Serraino; Carlo La Vecchia Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Cindy K Blair; Anna E Prizment; David R Jacobs; Susan E Steck; James R Hébert Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Antonella Zucchetto; Maurizio Montella; Massimo Libra; Werner Garavello; Marta Rossi; Carlo La Vecchia; Diego Serraino Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.900