A M Hodge1, J K Bassett2, N Shivappa3,4, J R Hébert3,4, D R English2,5, G G Giles2,5, G Severi2,6,7,8,9. 1. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. allison.hodge@cancervic.org.au. 2. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. 3. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. 5. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 207 Bouverie St, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. 6. Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France. 7. Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France. 8. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 9. HuGeF, Human Genetics Foundation, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the associations of Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) with lung cancer. METHODS: We used data from men and women aged 40-69 years at recruitment in 1990-1994, who were participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (n = 35,303). A total of 403 incident lung cancer cases were identified over an average 18-year follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for smoking status and other risk factors, with age as the time metric. RESULTS: An inverse correlation was observed between the DII and MDS (ρ = -0.45), consistent with a higher DII being pro-inflammatory and less 'healthy,' while a high MDS reflects a 'healthier' diet. The DII was positively associated with risk of lung cancer in current smokers [HRQ4 vs Q1 = 1.70 (1.02, 2.82); Ptrend = 0.008] (p interaction between DII quartiles and smoking status = 0.03). The MDS was inversely associated with lung cancer risk overall [HR7-9 vs 0-3 = 0.64 (0.45, 0.90); Ptrend = 0.005] and for current smokers (HR7-9 vs 0-3 = 0.38 (0.19, 0.75); Ptrend = 0.005) (p interaction between MDS categories and smoking status = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: The MDS showed an inverse association with lung cancer risk, especially for current smokers. A high DII, indicating a more pro-inflammatory diet, was associated with risk of lung cancer only for current smokers. A healthy diet may reduce the risk of lung cancer, especially in smokers.
PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the associations of Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) with lung cancer. METHODS: We used data from men and women aged 40-69 years at recruitment in 1990-1994, who were participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (n = 35,303). A total of 403 incident lung cancer cases were identified over an average 18-year follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for smoking status and other risk factors, with age as the time metric. RESULTS: An inverse correlation was observed between the DII and MDS (ρ = -0.45), consistent with a higher DII being pro-inflammatory and less 'healthy,' while a high MDS reflects a 'healthier' diet. The DII was positively associated with risk of lung cancer in current smokers [HRQ4 vs Q1 = 1.70 (1.02, 2.82); Ptrend = 0.008] (p interaction between DII quartiles and smoking status = 0.03). The MDS was inversely associated with lung cancer risk overall [HR7-9 vs 0-3 = 0.64 (0.45, 0.90); Ptrend = 0.005] and for current smokers (HR7-9 vs 0-3 = 0.38 (0.19, 0.75); Ptrend = 0.005) (p interaction between MDS categories and smoking status = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: The MDS showed an inverse association with lung cancer risk, especially for current smokers. A high DII, indicating a more pro-inflammatory diet, was associated with risk of lung cancer only for current smokers. A healthy diet may reduce the risk of lung cancer, especially in smokers.
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Anna E Prizment; Cindy K Blair; David R Jacobs; Susan E Steck; James R Hébert Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Susan E Steck; Jiajia Zhang; Yunsheng Ma; Angela D Liese; Ilir Agalliu; Melanie Hingle; Lifang Hou; Thomas G Hurley; Li Jiao; Lisa W Martin; Amy E Millen; Hannah L Park; Milagros C Rosal; James M Shikany; Nitin Shivappa; Judith K Ockene; James R Hebert Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Michel Langlois; Evi Debruyne; Ascensión Marcos; Inge Huybrechts Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Neil E Caporaso; Hormuzd A Katki; Hui-Lee Wong; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Sharon R Pine; Stephen J Chanock; James J Goedert; Eric A Engels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael D Wirth; James Burch; Nitin Shivappa; John M Violanti; Cecil M Burchfiel; Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Tara A Hartley; Diane B Miller; Anna Mnatsakanova; Luenda E Charles; Susan E Steck; Thomas G Hurley; John E Vena; James R Hébert Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Simin Liu; JoAnn E Manson; Julie E Buring; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Paul M Ridker Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jessie A Satia; Alyson Littman; Christopher G Slatore; Joseph A Galanko; Emily White Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Susan E Steck; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hussey; Yunsheng Ma; Ira S Ockene; Fred Tabung; James R Hébert Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: A M Hodge; J K Bassett; P-A Dugué; N Shivappa; J R Hébert; R L Milne; D R English; G G Giles Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Dayeon Shin; Simona C Kwon; Mi Hye Kim; Kyung Won Lee; Soe Yeon Choi; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Hae-Kyung Chung Journal: Nutrition Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.008