Literature DB >> 31464467

Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Jiageng Chen1, Andrew B Leber1, Julie D Golomb1.   

Abstract

We live in a dynamic, distracting world. When distracting information captures attention, what are the consequences for perception? Previous literature has focused on effects such as reaction time (RT) slowing, accuracy decrements, and oculomotor capture by distractors. In the current study, we asked whether attentional capture by distractors can also more fundamentally alter target feature representations, and if so, whether participants are aware of such errors. Using a continuous report task and novel confidence range report paradigm, we discovered 2 types of feature-binding errors when a distractor was presented along with the target: First, when attention is strongly captured by the distractor, participants commit swapping errors (misreporting the color at the distractor location instead of the target color), which remarkably seem to occur without awareness. Second, when participants successfully resist capture, they tend to exhibit repulsion (perceptual distortion away from the color at the distractor location). Thus, we found that capture not only induces a spatial shift of attention, it also alters feature perception in striking ways. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31464467      PMCID: PMC6996971          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.

Authors:  Emilie Leblanc; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Limor Alon; Tomer Carmel; Nir Shalev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11-20

5.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

6.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision.

Authors:  W T Newsome; K H Britten; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Zara E L'heureux; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19
View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceptual comparisons modulate memory biases induced by new visual inputs.

Authors:  Joseph M Saito; Matthew Kolisnyk; Keisuke Fukuda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-06

2.  Temporal integration of feature probability distributions.

Authors:  Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Sóley Þorsteinsdóttir; Joy J Geng; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 3.  The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-05-20

5.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

6.  Long-term memory interference is resolved via repulsion and precision along diagnostic memory dimensions.

Authors:  Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.