Literature DB >> 30694718

Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Emma Wu Dowd1, Julie D Golomb1.   

Abstract

Visual object perception requires integration of multiple features; spatial attention is thought to be critical to this binding. But attention is rarely static-how does dynamic attention impact object integrity? Here, we manipulated covert spatial attention and had participants (total N = 48) reproduce multiple properties (color, orientation, location) of a target item. Object-feature binding was assessed by applying probabilistic models to the joint distribution of feature errors: Feature reports for the same object could be correlated (and thus bound together) or independent. We found that splitting attention across multiple locations degrades object integrity, whereas rapid shifts of spatial attention maintain bound objects. Moreover, we document a novel attentional phenomenon, wherein participants exhibit unintentional fluctuations- lapses of spatial attention-yet nevertheless preserve object integrity at the wrong location. These findings emphasize the importance of a single focus of spatial attention for object-feature binding, even when that focus is dynamically moving across the visual field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional shift; feature binding; lapses of attention; open data; open materials; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694718      PMCID: PMC6419262          DOI: 10.1177/0956797618818481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  39 in total

1.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Müller; W Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010).

Authors:  Kyle R Cave; William S Bush; Thalia G G Taylor
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A detection theory account of change detection.

Authors:  Patrick Wilken; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Reprioritization of Features of Multidimensional Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Young Eun Park; Jocelyn L Sy; Sang Wook Hong; Frank Tong
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-28

Review 8.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison.

Authors:  John K Kruschke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

9.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Yuri B Saalmann; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  14 in total

1.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Crowding and Binding: Not All Feature Dimensions Behave in the Same Way.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Xiuyun Wu; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18

3.  The Binding Problem after an eye movement.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  The location independence of learned attentional flexibility.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Renate Ma; Mayuri S Albal; Julianne Key
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding.

Authors:  Megan T deBettencourt; Stephanie D Williams; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

7.  Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Stimulus variability and task relevance modulate binding-learning.

Authors:  Nithin George; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Predictive remapping leaves a behaviorally measurable attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps.

Authors:  Chuyao Yan; Tao He; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-25

10.  Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.