Literature DB >> 24647672

Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention.

Julie D Golomb1, Zara E L'heureux, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

When people move their eyes, the eye-centered (retinotopic) locations of objects must be updated to maintain world-centered (spatiotopic) stability. Here, we demonstrated that the attentional-updating process temporarily distorts the fundamental ability to bind object locations with their features. Subjects were simultaneously presented with four colors after a saccade-one in a precued spatiotopic target location-and were instructed to report the target's color using a color wheel. Subjects' reports were systematically shifted in color space toward the color of the distractor in the retinotopic location of the cue. Probabilistic modeling exposed both crude swapping errors and subtler feature mixing (as if the retinotopic color had blended into the spatiotopic percept). Additional experiments conducted without saccades revealed that the two types of errors stemmed from different attentional mechanisms (attention shifting vs. splitting). Feature mixing not only reflects a new perceptual phenomenon, but also provides novel insight into how attention is remapped across saccades.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye centered; eye movements; illusory conjunction; remapping; retinotopic; saccade; spatiotopic; visual attention; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24647672      PMCID: PMC4031196          DOI: 10.1177/0956797614522068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  26 in total

1.  Saccades compress space, time and number.

Authors:  David C Burr; John Ross; Paola Binda; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Feature mixing rather than feature replacement during perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  P-J Hsieh; P U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-04

5.  Attentional facilitation throughout human visual cortex lingers in retinotopic coordinates after eye movements.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Alyssa Y Nguyen-Phuc; James A Mazer; Gregory McCarthy; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Attention doesn't slide: spatiotopic updating after eye movements instantiates a new, discrete attentional locus.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Alexandria C Marino; Marvin M Chun; James A Mazer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Remapped visual masking.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Spatiotopic coding of BOLD signal in human visual cortex depends on spatial attention.

Authors:  Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; Giovanni d'Avossa; David C Burr; Michela Tosetti; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

2.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Donatas Jonikaitis; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The Binding Problem after an eye movement.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-04-04

8.  The representation of the saccade target object depends on visual stability.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Cathleen M Moore; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-09-01

9.  Evidence for Optimal Integration of Visual Feature Representations across Saccades.

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.