Literature DB >> 18052780

Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.

Emilie Leblanc1, David J Prime, Pierre Jolicoeur.   

Abstract

Currently, there is considerable controversy regarding the degree to which top-down control can affect attentional capture by salient events. According to the contingent capture hypothesis, attentional capture by a salient stimulus is contingent on a match between the properties of the stimulus and top-down attentional control settings. In contrast, bottom-up saliency accounts argue that the initial capture of attention is determined solely by the relative salience of the stimulus, and the effect of top-down attentional control is limited to effects on the duration of attentional engagement on the capturing stimulus. In the present study, we tested these competing accounts by utilizing the N2pc event-related potential component to track the locus of attention during an attentional capture task. The results were completely consistent with the contingent capture hypothesis: An N2pc wave was elicited only by distractors that possessed the target-defining attribute. In a second experiment, we expanded upon this finding by exploring the effect of target-distractor similarity on the duration that attention dwells at the distractor location. In this experiment, only distractors possessing the target-defining attribute (color) captured visuospatial attention to their location and the N2pc increased in duration and in magnitude when the capture distractor also shared a second target attribute (category membership). Finally, in three additional control experiments, we replicated the finding of an N2pc generated by distractors, only if they shared the target-defining attribute. Thus, our results demonstrate that attentional control settings influence both which stimuli attract attention and to what extent they are processed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18052780     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  29 in total

1.  Salience detection and attentional capture.

Authors:  Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09

2.  Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Rosalie Perron; Christine Lefebvre; Nicolas Robitaille; Benoit Brisson; Frédéric Gosselin; Martin Arguin; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-18

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Attentional control: temporal relationships within the fronto-parietal network.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Dwight J Kravitz; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-08

8.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Searching for something familiar or novel: top-down attentional selection of specific items or object categories.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Gaia Scerif; Richard N Aslin; Tim J Smith; Rebecca Nako; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Wieske van Zoest; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.