Literature DB >> 3146420

Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

J M Pouilles1, F Tremollieres, J P Louvet, B Fournie, G Morlock, C Ribot.   

Abstract

Lumbar spine bone mass and density were measured with Dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) in 60 patients with crush fractures and 60 age-matched normal women. Short-term reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) was 1.3% in normal women and 2.5% in osteoporotic women; long-term reproducibility in normal women was 2.2%. The reproducibility of bone mineral content (BMC) seemed to be poorer than that of BMD. In this study, aortic calcifications had no effect on BMD, and one or two crush fractures in the L2-L4 region increased BMD by an average of 3% (0-10%). Lumbar spine DPA provided high sensitivity for these younger crush fracture osteoporotic patients (x = 65 years). The sensitivity at 95% specificity was 74% for BMD and 73% for BMC. This sensitivity is substantially better than that reported for DPA instruments giving higher variances or for quantitative computed tomography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3146420     DOI: 10.1007/bf02553274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  28 in total

1.  Noninvasive bone mineral measurements.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; B L Riggs
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; M A Ganott; G Wyshak; D M Slovik; S H Doppelt; R M Neer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Nilas; A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Assessment of vertebral osteopenia. Comparison of spinal radiography and dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Krølner; B Berthelsen; S Pors Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1982

5.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Single and dual energy tomographic analysis of spinal trabecular bone: a comparative study in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Pacifici; N Susman; P L Carr; S J Birge; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Bone mass, bone structure and vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  J Pøodenphant; V A Nielsen; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prevention of post-menopausal bone loss with 1 alpha-hydroxy vitamin D3. A three-year prospective study.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

4.  Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss from the spine.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; G E Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Influence of Prevalent Vertebral Fracture on the Correlation between Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density and Risk of New Vertebral Fracture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kobayashi; Masayuki Kaneko; Mamoru Narukawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; B Zegels; I Jupsin; A Albert; P Franchimont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The influence of aortic calcification on spinal bone mineral density in vitro.

Authors:  H Hoshino; K Kushida; M Takahashi; T Ohishi; E Sugiyama; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  P von der Recke; M A Hansen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fluoride therapy in postmenopausal osteopenic women: effect on vertebral and femoral bone density and prediction of bone response.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; E Causse; J P Louvet; C Ribot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.