Literature DB >> 31463575

The importance of forensic storage support: DNA quality from 11-year-old saliva on FTA cards.

Beatrice Corradini1, Milena Alù2, Elena Magnanini3, Mathilde Emmanuelle Galinier4, Enrico Silingardi2.   

Abstract

Storage conditions influence the integrity of the recoverable DNA from forensic evidence in terms of yield and quality. FTA cards are widely used in the forensic practice as their chemically treated matrix provides protection from the moment of collection to the point of analysis with current STR typing technology. In this study, we assess the recoverability and the integrity of DNA from 11-year-old saliva on FTA cards using a forensic quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) commercial assay. The quality after long-term storage was investigated in order to evaluate if the FTA device could assure enough stability over time, applying some internally validated quality criteria of the STR profile. Furthermore, we used a 3D interpolation model to combine the quantitative and qualitative data from qPCR to calculate the minimum optimal DNA input (MODI) to add to the downstream PCR reaction based on the quantitative and qualitative data of a sample. According to our results, when saliva sample is properly transferred onto FTA cards and then correctly stored according to the manufacturer's instructions, it is possible to recover sufficient amounts of DNA for human identification even after more than a decade of storage at ambient temperature. Degradation affected the quality of results especially when the Degradation Index exceeds the value of 2.12, requiring modifications of the standard internal workflow to improve the genotyping quality. Above this value, the application of a "corrective factor" to the PCR normalization process was necessary in order to adjust the recommended manufacturer's PCR DNA input taking into account the degradation level. Our results demonstrated the importance to consider in predictive terms the parameters obtained with the real-time quantification assay, both in terms of quantity (DNA concentration) and of quality (DI, inhibition). Informatics predictive tools including qPCR data together with the variables of storage duration and conditions should be developed in order to optimize the DNA analysis process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA quantification; Degradation; FTA cards; STR typing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463575     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02146-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.

Authors:  David J Balding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA--a review.

Authors:  Reza Alaeddini; Simon J Walsh; Ali Abbas
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.882

3.  Determining the optimal forensic DNA analysis procedure following investigation of sample quality.

Authors:  Ronny Hedell; Johannes Hedman; Petter Mostad
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  High-throughput sequencing of forensic genetic samples using punches of FTA cards with buccal swabs.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Kampmann; Anders Buchard; Claus Børsting; Niels Morling
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems.

Authors:  Sze-Wah Lin; Christina Li; Stephen C Y Ip
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.

Authors:  Stefano Vernarecci; Enrica Ottaviani; Alessandro Agostino; Elisabetta Mei; Lisa Calandro; Paola Montagna
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Human DNA quantification and sample quality assessment: Developmental validation of the PowerQuant(®) system.

Authors:  Margaret M Ewing; Jonelle M Thompson; Robert S McLaren; Vincent M Purpero; Kelli J Thomas; Patricia A Dobrowski; Gretchen A DeGroot; Erica L Romsos; Douglas R Storts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  DNA quality and quantity from up to 16 years old post-mortem blood stored on FTA cards.

Authors:  Anna-Liina Rahikainen; Jukka U Palo; Wiljo de Leeuw; Bruce Budowle; Antti Sajantila
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Thore Egeland; Peter Gill
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  The effects of storage temperature and duration of blood samples on DNA and RNA qualities.

Authors:  Lien-Hung Huang; Pei-Hsien Lin; Kuo-Wang Tsai; Liang-Jen Wang; Ying-Hsien Huang; Ho-Chang Kuo; Sung-Chou Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating Flinders Technology Associates card for transporting bacterial isolates and retrieval of bacterial DNA after various storage conditions.

Authors:  Azhar G Shalaby; Neveen R Bakry; Abeer A E Mohamed; Ashraf A Khalil
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 2.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  DNA testing for sickle cell anemia in Africa: Implementation choices for the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Mamy Ngole; Valerie Race; Gloire Mbayabo; Paul Lumbala; Cathy Songo; Prosper Tshilobo Lukusa; Koenraad Devriendt; Gert Matthijs; Aimé Lumaka
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.