| Literature DB >> 31435174 |
Yi Gao1, Rong-Qian Wu2, Yi Lv1, Xiao-Peng Yan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinically, tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is lack of effective surgical strategies. One reason is due to the lack of appropriate animal models of acquired TEF, which is usually complex and difficult. Recently, the magnetic compression technique has been applied for digestive tract anastomosis or vascular anastomosis in animals. In this study, an animal model of TEF in dogs was developed by using the magnetic compression technique, hoping to provide a new method for mimicking TEF. AIM: To establish a TEF model in dogs by using the magnetic compression technique.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Beagle; Magnetic compression technique; Tracheoesophageal fistula
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31435174 PMCID: PMC6700694 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1The magnetic device. A: The daughter magnet and the transmission magnet; B: The parent magnet and the transmission magnet; C: The anchor magnet; D: The transmission magnet and the anchor magnet can be used to position the daughter magnet.
Figure 2Study procedures. A: Normal anatomy of the trachea and esophagus in the beagle; B: The daughter magnet was inserted into the trachea and advanced to the target location using the transmission magnet and the guide wire; C: The anchor magnet was placed on the neck of the animal over the trachea to fix the daughter magnet in its target location; D: The guide wire and transmission magnet were withdrawn from the trachea; E: The parent magnet was inserted into the cervical esophagus and advanced to the target location using the transmission magnet and the guide wire; F: The parent magnet and daughter magnet were attracted to each other by magnetic force; G: The guide wire and transmission magnet were withdrawn from the esophagus, and the anchor magnet was removed; H: 4-6 d later, the necrotic tissue between the two magnets had been shed and the parent magnet and daughter magnet had detached from the target location. The tracheoesophageal fistula was formed.
Figure 3The study procedures were performed successfully in all six beagles. A: The parent and daughter magnets; B and C: Fluoroscopy showing that the parent and daughter magnets were coupled and retained in the target location; D and E: Endoscopy showing the magnets in the trachea and the esophagus.
Figure 4Results after implantation. A: 6 d after magnet implantation: X-ray showing that the magnets were located in the digestive tract; B: 8 d after magnet implantation: the magnets were expelled from the animal through the digestive tract; C: 8 d after magnet implantation: esophageal angiography showing the contrast media flowing from the esophagus into the trachea; D: Bronchoscopy showing a fistula located in the posterior wall of the trachea; E: Gastroscopy showing a fistula located in the anterior wall of the esophagus; F: Gastroscopy/bronchoscopy showing methylene blue flowing from the esophagus into the trachea.
Figure 5Gross and histological observations. A: Gross specimens of the trachea and esophagus; B: There was no tissue adhesion between the trachea and the esophagus, except around the fistula; C: Gross specimen showing the fistula in the esophagus; D: Gross specimen showing the fistula in the trachea; E and F: Histological analysis demonstrated that the esophageal mucosa (blue arrow) and pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium (black arrow) were absent at the site of the fistula.