| Literature DB >> 35842556 |
Miaomiao Zhang1,2, Jianqi Mao3, Yixing Li4, Shuqin Xu1,2, Jingci Gai5, Ting Lan5, Yirui Wang5, Yuxiang Ren3, Aihua Shi6, Yi Lyu7,8, Xiaopeng Yan9,10.
Abstract
Magnetic compression technique (MCT) is a popular new anastomosis method. In this paper, we aimed to explore the feasibility of use of MCT for performing cystotomy in rabbits. The parent magnets and daughter magnets for rabbit cystostomy were designed and manufactured according to the anatomical characteristics of rabbit lower urinary tract. Twelve female New Zealand rabbits were used as animal models. After anesthesia, a daughter magnet was inserted into the bladder through the urethra, and the parent magnet was placed on the body surface projection of the bladder over the abdominal wall. The two magnets automatically attract each other. Postoperatively, the state of magnets was monitored daily, and the time when the magnets fell off was recorded. Cystostomy with MCT was successfully performed in all twelve rabbits. The mean operation time was 4.46 ± 0.75 min. The magnets fell off from the abdominal wall after a mean duration of 10.08 ± 1.62 days, resulting in the formation of bladder fistula. Macroscopic and microscopic examination showed that the fistula was well formed and unobstructed. The junction between bladder and abdominal wall was tight and smooth. We provide preliminary experimental evidence of the safety and feasibility of cystostomy based on MCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35842556 PMCID: PMC9288424 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16595-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Photographs of the daughter magnet and the parent magnet. (A) Bottom view of daughter magnet (red arrow) and parent magnet (black arrow). (B) Side view of the magnets. (C) Bottom view of the two magnets attracted together. (D) Side view of the two magnets attracted together.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the surgical procedure. (A) The guide wire was inserted through the urethra into the bladder. (B) The daughter magnet and scalp needle tube were inserted through the end of the guide wire. (C) The daughter magnet was pushed along the guide wire into the bladder by pushing the scalp needle tube. (D) The guide wire and the scalp needle tube were removed. (E) After placing the parent magnet on the abdominal wall, the two magnets attract each other.
Figure 3Representative intraoperative images. (A) X-ray image obtained after the guide wire had entered the bladder. (B) Daughter magnet (red arrow) is being inserted through the urethra (U) with the help of a scalp needle tube (T). (C–E) The daughter magnet is inserted into the bladder along the guide wire. (F) Anteroposterior radiograph showing the two magnets attracted together (white arrow). (G) Lateral radiograph showing the two magnets attracted together. (H) Photograph showing the parent magnet (black arrow) on the abdominal wall.
Figure 4Confirmation of the position of the two magnets by cystography. (A) Anteroposterior radiograph; (B) Lateral radiograph.
Figure 5Gross specimens of bladder fistula. (A) Photograph showing the bladder fistula on the abdominal wall and the fallen-off magnets [the lower panel shows the daughter magnet (left), necrotic tissue (middle), and parent magnet (right)]. (B) The fistula specimen is unobstructed enough to allow the passage of the tube through it. (C) Fistula on the side of the bladder. (D) Fistula on the side of abdominal wall. (E) Longitudinal section through the fistula. (F) The bladder fistula is closely adhered to the abdominal wall, but there are no adhesions elsewhere (“★” is the urethra; “▲” is the bladder; “*” is the abdominal wall; the orange arrow indicates the fistula).
Figure 6Histological specimens. (A,B) Anastomosis of bladder and abdominal wall. (C,D) Necrotic tissue between the parent and daughter magnet.