Literature DB >> 31373628

Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Belcy K Angarita1,2, Rodolfo J C Cantet1, Kaitlin E Wurtz2, Carly I O O’Malley2, Janice M Siegford2, Catherine W Ernst2, Simon P Turner3, Juan P Steibel2,4.   

Abstract

Mixing of pigs into new social groups commonly induces aggressive interactions that result in skin lesions on the body of the animals. The relationship between skin lesions and aggressive behavioral interactions in group-housed pigs can be analyzed within the framework of social genetic effects (SGE). This study incorporates the quantification of aggressive interactions between pairs of animals in the modeling of SGE for skin lesions in different regions of the body in growing pigs. The dataset included 792 pigs housed in 59 pens. Skin lesions in the anterior, central, and caudal regions of the body were counted 24 h after pig mixing. Animals were video-recorded for 9 h postmixing and trained observers recorded the type and duration of aggressive interactions between pairs of animals. The number of seconds that pairs of pigs spent engaged in reciprocal fights and unilateral attack behaviors were used to parametrize the intensity of social interactions (ISI). Three types of models were fitted: direct genetic additive model (DGE), traditional social genetic effect model (TSGE) assuming uniform interactions between dyads, and an intensity-based social genetic effect model (ISGE) that used ISI to parameterize SGE. All models included fixed effects of sex, replicate, lesion scorer, weight at mixing, premixing lesion count, and the total time that the animal spent engaged in aggressive interactions (reciprocal fights and unilateral attack behaviors) as a covariate; a random effect of pen; and a random direct genetic effect. The ISGE models recovered more direct genetic variance than DGE and TSGE, and the estimated heritabilities (h^D2) were highest for all traits (P < 0.01) for the ISGE with ISI parametrized with unilateral attack behavior. The TSGE produced estimates that did not differ significantly from DGE (P > 0.5). Incorporating the ISI into ISGE, even in a small dataset, allowed separate estimation of the genetic parameters for direct and SGE, as well as the genetic correlation between direct and SGE (r^ds), which was positive for all lesion traits. The estimates from ISGE suggest that if behavioral observations are available, selection incorporating SGE may reduce the consequences of aggressive behaviors after mixing pigs.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; damaging aggression; pigs; skin lesions; social genetic effects

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31373628      PMCID: PMC6735787          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  25 in total

1.  Unexpected estimates of variance components with a true model containing genetic competition effects.

Authors:  L D Van Vleck; J P Cassady
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts.

Authors:  J Arango; I Misztal; S Tsuruta; M Culbertson; W Herring
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effect of competition on gain in feedlot bulls from Hereford selection lines.

Authors:  L D Van Vleck; L V Cundiff; R M Koch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines.

Authors:  E D Ellen; J Visscher; J A M van Arendonk; P Bijma
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  On identifiability of (co)variance components in animal models with competition effects.

Authors:  R J C Cantet; E P Cappa
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs.

Authors:  William M Muir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Bayesian analysis of genetic associations of skin lesions and behavioural traits to identify genetic components of individual aggressiveness in pigs.

Authors:  S P Turner; R Roehe; W Mekkawy; M J Farnworth; P W Knap; A B Lawrence
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  R Bergsma; E Kanis; E F Knol; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  7 in total

1.  Feeding behavior in pigs.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Phenomes: the current frontier in animal breeding.

Authors:  Miguel Pérez-Enciso; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Genetic Analysis of Novel Behaviour Traits in Pigs Derived from Social Network Analysis.

Authors:  Saif Agha; Simone Foister; Rainer Roehe; Simon P Turner; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Social Genetic Effects on Average Daily Gain in Purebreds and Crossbreds.

Authors:  Ha-Seung Seong; Young-Sin Kim; Soo-Jin Sa; Yongdae Jeong; Joon-Ki Hong; Eun-Seok Cho
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  The predictive ability of indirect genetic models is reduced when culled animals are omitted from the data.

Authors:  Birgitte Ask; Ole F Christensen; Marzieh Heidaritabar; Per Madsen; Hanne M Nielsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 6.  How to Improve Meat Quality and Welfare in Entire Male Pigs by Genetics.

Authors:  Catherine Larzul
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Social Life of Pigs: Changes in Affiliative and Agonistic Behaviors following Mixing.

Authors:  Carly I O'Malley; Juan P Steibel; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.