Literature DB >> 17371791

Effect of competition on gain in feedlot bulls from Hereford selection lines.

L D Van Vleck1, L V Cundiff, R M Koch.   

Abstract

This study examined competition effects on ADG in the feedlot of 1,882 Hereford bulls representing 8 birth years from a selection experiment. Each year, 8 feedlot pens were used to feed bulls in groups, with 2 pens nested within each of the 4 selection lines. Gains were recorded for up to 8 periods of 28 d. Models for analyses included pen effects (fixed or random), fixed effects such as year and line, and random direct genetic, competition genetic (and in some analyses competition environmental), and environmental effects. Each pen mate as a competitor affected the records of all others in the pen. All lines traced to common foundation animals, so the numerator relationships among and within pens were the bases for separating direct and competition genetic effects and pen effects. For this population and pen conditions (average of 30 bulls per pen), the major results were 1) competition genetic effects seemed present for the first 28-d period but not for the following 7 periods; 2) models with pens considered as fixed effects could not separate variances and covariance due to direct and competition genetic effects; 3) models without competition effects had large estimates of the variance component due to pen effects for gain through 8 periods; and 4) models with genetic and environmental competition effects accounted for nearly all of the variance traditionally attributed to pen effects (even though estimates of the competition variance component were small, the estimates of pen variance were near zero).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371791     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

Review 1.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Carly I O O’Malley; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Simon P Turner; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Indirect genetic effects and the genetic bases of social dominance: evidence from cattle.

Authors:  C Sartori; R Mantovani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Using pooled data to estimate variance components and breeding values for traits affected by social interactions.

Authors:  Katrijn Peeters; Esther Dorien Ellen; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  R Bergsma; E Kanis; E F Knol; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Indirect genetic effects for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are magnified in crossbred genotypes and show a parent-of-origin effect.

Authors:  K Peeters; T T Eppink; E D Ellen; J Visscher; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic parameters for social effects on survival in cannibalistic layers: combining survival analysis and a linear animal model.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; Vincent Ducrocq; Bart J Ducro; Roel F Veerkamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 8.  The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; T Bas Rodenburg; Gerard A A Albers; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Irene Camerlink; Naomi Duijvesteijn; Egbert F Knol; William M Muir; Katrijn Peeters; Inonge Reimert; Ewa Sell-Kubiak; Johan A M van Arendonk; Jeroen Visscher; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.

Authors:  Hooi Ling Khaw; Raul W Ponzoni; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.