Literature DB >> 19134072

On identifiability of (co)variance components in animal models with competition effects.

R J C Cantet1, E P Cappa.   

Abstract

There is an increased interest in estimating the (co)variance components of additive animal models with direct and competition effects (AMC). However, some attempts to estimate the dispersion parameters in different animal species faced problems of convergence or inaccurate estimates when pen effects entered the model. We argue that the problem relates to lack of identifiability of the (co)variance components in some AMC. The check for identifiability of the dispersion parameters in mixed models with linear (co)variance structure requires that all the eigenvalues of the restricted maximum likelyhood information matrix (I(theta)) be positive. We show, by way of simple numerical examples, that the singularity of I(theta) is due to confounding between fixed pen effects and the additive competition effects (SBVs). It is also observed that setting pen effects as random does not always remedy the collinearity with SBVs. An alternative AMC is presented in which the incidence matrix of the SBVs can be written as a function of the 'intensity of competition' (IC) among animals in the same pen. Examples are presented in which the ICs are related to time. The distribution of families of full and half sibs across pens also plays a role in the identifiability and asymptotic variances of the (co)variance components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19134072     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00743.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  14 in total

1.  Estimating indirect genetic effects: precision of estimates and optimum designs.

Authors:  Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Genetic-based interactions among tree neighbors: identification of the most influential neighbors, and estimation of correlations among direct and indirect genetic effects for leaf disease and growth in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  J Costa E Silva; B M Potts; A R Gilmour; R J Kerr
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Carly I O O’Malley; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Simon P Turner; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Estimation of direct and social effects of feeding duration in growing pigs using records from automatic feeding stations.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Junjie Han; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Sarah K Chewning; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Juan Pedro Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 6.  The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; T Bas Rodenburg; Gerard A A Albers; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Irene Camerlink; Naomi Duijvesteijn; Egbert F Knol; William M Muir; Katrijn Peeters; Inonge Reimert; Ewa Sell-Kubiak; Johan A M van Arendonk; Jeroen Visscher; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Full sib pens of pigs are not suitable to identify variance component of associative effect: a simulation study using Gibbs Sampling.

Authors:  Jiqiu Cheng; Steven Janssens; Nadine Buys
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Predicting direct and indirect breeding values for survival time in laying hens using repeated measures.

Authors:  Tessa Brinker; Esther D Ellen; Roel F Veerkamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Multilevel selection with kin and non-kin groups, experimental results with Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).

Authors:  William M Muir; P Bijma; A Schinckel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Longitudinal analysis of direct and indirect effects on average daily gain in rabbits using a structured antedependence model.

Authors:  Ingrid David; Juan-Pablo Sánchez; Miriam Piles
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.