Literature DB >> 15890801

Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts.

J Arango1, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, M Culbertson, W Herring.   

Abstract

Records of on-test ADG of Large White gilts were analyzed to estimate variance components of direct and associative genetic effects. Models included the effects of contemporary group (farm-barn-batch), birth litter, pen group, and direct and associative additive genetic effects. The area of each pen was 14 m2. The additive genetic variance was a function of the number of competitors in a group, the additive relationships between the animal performing the record and its pen mates, and the additive relationships between pen mates. To partially account for differences in the number of pen mates, a covariable (qi = 1, 1/n, or 1/n(1/2)) was added to the associative genetic effect. There were 4,946 records from 2,409 litters and 362 pen groups. Pen group size ranged from 12 to 16 gilts. Analyses by REML converged very slowly. A grid search showed that the likelihood function was almost flat when the additive genetic associative effect was fitted. Estimates of direct and associative heritability were 0.15 and 0.03, respectively. Within the BLUPF90 family of programs, the mixed-model equations can be set up directly. For variance component estimation, simple programs (REMLF90 and GIBBSF90) worked without modifications, but more optimized programs did not. Estimates obtained using the three values of qi were similar. With the data structure available for this study and under an environment with relative low competition among animals, accurate estimation of associative genetic effects was not possible. Estimation of competitive effects with large pen size is difficult. The magnitude of competition effects may be larger in commercial populations, where housing is denser and food is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890801     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8361241x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  27 in total

1.  Estimating indirect genetic effects: precision of estimates and optimum designs.

Authors:  Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multilevel selection 4: modeling the relationship of indirect genetic effects and group size.

Authors:  Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Carly I O O’Malley; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Simon P Turner; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Indirect genetic effects and the genetic bases of social dominance: evidence from cattle.

Authors:  C Sartori; R Mantovani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Prediction of genetic merit for growth rate in pigs using animal models with indirect genetic effects and genomic information.

Authors:  Bjarke G Poulsen; Birgitte Ask; Hanne M Nielsen; Tage Ostersen; Ole F Christensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  R Bergsma; E Kanis; E F Knol; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic parameters for social effects on survival in cannibalistic layers: combining survival analysis and a linear animal model.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; Vincent Ducrocq; Bart J Ducro; Roel F Veerkamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Piter Bijma; Esther D Ellen; William Muir
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Indirect genetic effects and housing conditions in relation to aggressive behaviour in pigs.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Simon P Turner; Piter Bijma; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.