Literature DB >> 17987375

Bayesian analysis of genetic associations of skin lesions and behavioural traits to identify genetic components of individual aggressiveness in pigs.

S P Turner1, R Roehe, W Mekkawy, M J Farnworth, P W Knap, A B Lawrence.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in genetic selection against behavioural traits that impact negatively on welfare and productivity in commercial livestock production. Post-mixing aggressiveness in pigs shows wide phenotypic variation, affects health, welfare and growth performance and is a routine feature of production. A Bayesian approach was used to estimate the heritability of three traits associated with aggressiveness in pigs during the 24 h post-mixing; duration in reciprocal aggression, and in receipt of, or delivery of non-reciprocal aggression (NRA). For the purposes of genetic selection, recording aggressive behaviour is excessively labour intensive. The genetic correlations were quantified between the behavioural traits and an easily measurable indicator trait; the number of skin lesions following mixing (lesion score, LS). The heritabilities for the three behavioural traits ranged from 0.17 to 0.46 (receipt of NRA and reciprocal aggression respectively). The duration in reciprocal aggression and in delivery of NRA showed a strong genetic correlation (r g = 0.79 with 95% Bayesian credibility interval of 0.62-0.94). The genetic correlation between LS and these two behaviours indicated that selection on breeding values of LS could be used to reduce aggressiveness. The duration in receipt of NRA appeared to be regulated by different genes or genomic effects compared with the other behavioural traits and LS. Although duration in receipt of NRA was not genetically associated with LS, it was lowly but significantly environmentally associated with the residuals of central and caudal LS (r e = 0.28-0.32), indicating that pigs that received NRA also received bites on the central and caudal third of the body. The pen that the animals were mixed into was found to be a very important factor for the analysed traits, in particular those representing behavioural characteristics. Based on the estimated genetic parameters, it is concluded that selection on breeding values for reduced LS (especially central LS) is expected to reduce reciprocal aggression and the delivery of NRA but will not change the receipt of NRA directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17987375     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-007-9171-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  15 in total

1.  Behavioural genetic differences between Chinese and European pigs.

Authors:  Qingpo Chu; Tingting Liang; Lingling Fu; Huizhi Li; Bo Zhou
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Carly I O O’Malley; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Simon P Turner; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Association of HPA axis-related genetic variation with stress reactivity and aggressive behaviour in pigs.

Authors:  Eduard Muráni; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Richard B D'Eath; Simon P Turner; Esra Kurt; Gary Evans; Ludger Thölking; Ronald Klont; Aline Foury; Pierre Mormède; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Maternal and direct genetic parameters for tail length, tail lesions, and growth traits in pigs.

Authors:  Sheila Aikins-Wilson; Mehdi Bohlouli; Sven König
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The fight-or-flight response is associated with PBMC expression profiles related to immune defence and recovery in swine.

Authors:  Michael Oster; Mathias Scheel; Eduard Muráni; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Manuela Zebunke; Birger Puppe; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Modelling Farm Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Lisa M Collins; Chérie E Part
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  From "Animal Machines" to "Happy Meat"? Foucault's Ideas of Disciplinary and Pastoral Power Applied to 'Animal-Centred' Welfare Discourse.

Authors:  Matthew Cole
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Transcriptional responses of PBMC in psychosocially stressed animals indicate an alerting of the immune system in female but not in castrated male pigs.

Authors:  Michael Oster; Eduard Muráni; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Richard B D'Eath; Simon P Turner; Gary Evans; Ludger Thölking; Esra Kurt; Ronald Klont; Aline Foury; Pierre Mormède; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Evidence for litter differences in play behaviour in pre-weaned pigs.

Authors:  Sarah Mills Brown; Michael Klaffenböck; Ian Macleod Nevison; Alistair Burnett Lawrence
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.448

10.  Winner-loser effects overrule aggressiveness during the early stages of contests between pigs.

Authors:  Lucy Oldham; Irene Camerlink; Gareth Arnott; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson; Marianne Farish; Simon P Turner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.