Literature DB >> 31368710

Real-Time Assembly of Viruslike Nucleocapsids Elucidated at the Single-Particle Level.

Margherita Marchetti1,2, Douwe Kamsma1, Ernesto Cazares Vargas3, Armando Hernandez García3, Paul van der Schoot4,5, Renko de Vries6, Gijs J L Wuite1, Wouter H Roos2.   

Abstract

While the structure of a multitude of viral particles has been resolved to atomistic detail, their assembly pathways remain largely elusive. Key unresolved issues are particle nucleation, particle growth, and the mode of genome compaction. These issues are difficult to address in bulk approaches and are effectively only accessible by the real-time tracking of assembly dynamics of individual particles. This we do here by studying the assembly into rod-shaped viruslike particles (VLPs) of artificial capsid polypeptides. Using fluorescence optical tweezers, we establish that small oligomers perform one-dimensional diffusion along the DNA. Larger oligomers are immobile and nucleate VLP growth. A multiplexed acoustic force spectroscopy approach reveals that DNA is compacted in regular steps, suggesting packaging via helical wrapping into a nucleocapsid. By reporting how real-time assembly tracking elucidates viral nucleation and growth principles, our work opens the door to a fundamental understanding of the complex assembly pathways of both VLPs and naturally evolved viruses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self-assembly; acoustic force spectroscopy; artificial virus; biophysics; optical tweezers; physical virology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368710      PMCID: PMC6696885          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


The structure of viral particles is typically highly regular and remarkably stable.[1] A number of viruses have been reconstituted in vitro, suggesting that quite generic physical driving forces determine their assembly pathways. This motivated trials to replace viral genomes with other cargo, allowing viruses to be employed, e.g., as drug delivery platforms.[2−4] Many bulk experimental studies[5−8] as well as modeling and computer simulation approaches[9−11] have been performed to elucidate the in vitro assembly pathways of viral particles. An important conclusion is that the multiplicity of assembly pathways in the experiments obscures interpretation of the findings.[12] Central questions yet to be answered include the nature of the critical nuclei required for productive viral particle formation as well as the nature and dynamics of nucleic acid condensation during particle formation.[13−15] In order to discriminate between different pathways and to identify assembly intermediates, real-time assembly of viral particles should be probed at the single-particle level. Single molecule techniques such as electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) provide for high-resolution images of viruses but typically yield images with only limited information on dynamic assembly pathways.[16,17] High-resolution AFM imaging and electron microscopy have recently provided access to information on transient capsid intermediates from which kinetic assembly parameters can be estimated.[18] In addition, new approaches, such as resistive-pulse sensing in nanofluidic devices, probe late-state intermediates during viral assembly.[19] Here we go beyond these recent studies by using combined confocal fluorescence and optical tweezing to identify the nature of critical nuclei in capsid formation. In addition, we use acoustic force spectroscopy to probe in real-time not only the dynamics and nature of particle growth but also nucleic acid condensation during the formation of single, rod-shaped nucleocapsid particles. We do this for a previously de novo designed artificial capsid polypeptide bearing a stretch of lysines,[20] which interacts through electrostatic interactions with the phosphates of single or double-stranded DNA templates to coassemble into rod-shaped viruslike particles (VLPs). This polypeptide was designed to mimic the essential features of the in vitro assembly of Tobacco Mosaic Virus particles, viz. obligate coassembly with a linear nucleic acid template, with growth proceeding from a single nucleus. Indeed, the time evolution of the particle size distributions of both TMV and the VLPs can be accurately fitted to the same kinetic model, yielding similar energies for particle nucleation and particle growth.[9,20,21] The rod-shaped VLPs consist of a single DNA molecule coated with multiple copies of the artificial capsid polypeptide. The latter we refer to as C–S10–B, with each of its three blocks encoding a specific physicochemical functionality, mimicking corresponding functionalities of viral capsid proteins (Figure A).
Figure 1

Artificial capsid polypeptide under investigation and the resulting formation of rod-shaped particles. (A) Schematic of the triblocks polypeptide C–S10–B. Each block is highlighted by a different color and its specific function, related to its physiochemical properties, as described in the methods. (B) Particle formation on DNA molecules of different lengths was probed with AFM imaging in the air. On DNA of ∼1 μm contour length, mainly single particles form in which the DNA is compacted 1/3 of its original length (panel i). When a 3-fold longer DNA is employed (∼3 μm contour length), 2–4 nucleation points are observed in the early stages of particles assembly (panel ii). The white arrows point at two different nucleation sites that are formed on the same DNA molecule. (C) Quantification from AFM images of the “slow” kinetics of particle formation on a 2.5 kbp DNA, being packed to 1/3 of its original length, as also previously shown.[20] Error bars are standard deviations and for each time point ∼100 particles were analyzed.

Artificial capsid polypeptide under investigation and the resulting formation of rod-shaped particles. (A) Schematic of the triblocks polypeptide C–S10–B. Each block is highlighted by a different color and its specific function, related to its physiochemical properties, as described in the methods. (B) Particle formation on DNA molecules of different lengths was probed with AFM imaging in the air. On DNA of ∼1 μm contour length, mainly single particles form in which the DNA is compacted 1/3 of its original length (panel i). When a 3-fold longer DNA is employed (∼3 μm contour length), 2–4 nucleation points are observed in the early stages of particles assembly (panel ii). The white arrows point at two different nucleation sites that are formed on the same DNA molecule. (C) Quantification from AFM images of the “slow” kinetics of particle formation on a 2.5 kbp DNA, being packed to 1/3 of its original length, as also previously shown.[20] Error bars are standard deviations and for each time point ∼100 particles were analyzed. We here use these simple model capsid polypeptides to address key issues regarding capsid assembly pathways not only in real-time but also at the single-particle level. We study the nature of the critical nuclei for productive capsid formation, the dynamics of particle growth, and the dynamics and nature of nucleic acid condensation during capsid formation. Our study on this simple model system paves the way for detailed real-time in vitro studies of the assembly of naturally evolved viruses at the single-particle level.

Results

Real-Time Observation of Nucleation on Long DNA

First we use atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging to recapitulate basic properties of encapsulation of linear DNA by the artificial capsid polypeptides.[17] Upon mixing the capsid polypeptides with double-stranded DNA, rod-shaped particles are formed, confirming earlier findings[20] (Figure B). The kinetics of particle formation can be quantified by analyzing the length of packaged DNA as a function of time (Figure C). DNA with a contour length <1 μm typically displays one or two nucleation sites, while longer DNA with a contour length >1 μm often shows more than two nucleation sites (Figure B). The relative frequency of the number of nucleation points and the resulting branches in the self-assembled particle were quantified for a 2.5 kbp-long DNA (contour length of ≈850 nm) (Fig. S1). Next to imaging in air, we additionally performed AFM imaging in aqueous solution. This yielded an average diameter of the VLPs of 9 nm, a value that matches the expected lateral dimensions of the VLP (Fig. S1). Next we turn to investigating the assembly of single viruslike particles in real-time, first considering the nucleation of artificial capsids on their DNA templates. Specifically, we wish to elucidate the nature of the critical nuclei required for productive capsid growth. For this, we combine confocal fluorescence microscopy and optical tweezing.[22] A long DNA molecule (λ-phage DNA, contour length ≈16.5 μm) is attached at both ends to a microsphere (“bead”), and both beads are trapped using a double optical tweezers setup. Simultaneous confocal scanning laser microscopy allows for real-time probing of the local binding of fluorescently labeled artificial capsid polypeptides on the DNA[23] (Figure A). Because the DNA in this assay is long, multiple nuclei are expected to form (Fig. S1), making this technique particularly well suited to zoom in on VLP nucleation events. First, nucleation is allowed to proceed unimpeded by repeatedly keeping the DNA in a relaxed state (<1 pN) for a fixed amount of time (5 min), followed by a short period of imaging at a constant force of 5 pN (Figure B). We observe a shortening of the end-to-end distance as a function of time, indicating condensation of the DNA during the relaxed state phases (Figure B,i). We also observe an increasing number of nuclei as a function of time and a corresponding increase of the total fluorescence intensity (Figure B,ii). With these findings, which are supported by our AFM data, we confirm that in our dynamic assay multiple nucleation sites are indeed formed, capable of compacting the DNA in a progressive way.
Figure 2

Optical tweezers combined with confocal fluorescence microscopy reveals protein binding and compaction. (A) Illustration of a dual trap optical tweezers combined with confocal fluoresce microscopy. Two focused lasers beams (red) trap two microspheres that are chemically attached to a DNA molecule. Proteins in solution (green dots) bind to the DNA, and their fluorescence tag lights up when the scanning laser (light green beam) illuminates them. (B) Progressive packaging of the DNA by the polypeptides. (i) Confocal fluorescence images show how DNA shortening (from top to bottom, time = 0, 5, 15, 25 min. Yellow scale bar, 2.5 μm) is accompanied by an increase in the fluorescence intensity. (ii) Plots of fluorescence intensity, which is directly related to the number of bound peptides (fluorescence images y-position vs integrated fluorescence intensity (a.u.) along the DNA).

Optical tweezers combined with confocal fluorescence microscopy reveals protein binding and compaction. (A) Illustration of a dual trap optical tweezers combined with confocal fluoresce microscopy. Two focused lasers beams (red) trap two microspheres that are chemically attached to a DNA molecule. Proteins in solution (green dots) bind to the DNA, and their fluorescence tag lights up when the scanning laser (light green beam) illuminates them. (B) Progressive packaging of the DNA by the polypeptides. (i) Confocal fluorescence images show how DNA shortening (from top to bottom, time = 0, 5, 15, 25 min. Yellow scale bar, 2.5 μm) is accompanied by an increase in the fluorescence intensity. (ii) Plots of fluorescence intensity, which is directly related to the number of bound peptides (fluorescence images y-position vs integrated fluorescence intensity (a.u.) along the DNA). In order to study the mechanical effect of polypeptide binding to the DNA, relaxed DNA was first incubated with the proteins in solution, then stretched to an end-to-end distance nearly equal to its contour length, and subsequently relaxed back to zero force while recording the retraction force (Figs. S2 and S3). We find that the apparent persistence length Lp obtained by fitting a wormlike chain model to the retraction force[24] decreases sharply as the number of bound capsid polypeptides increases (Fig. S2B). This is consistent with the occurrence of induced deformations during DNA compaction, such as kinking or bending.[25,26] Indeed, the control polypeptide C–B, lacking the central S10 silklike block, known to simply coat but not condense the DNA,[27] does not show the reduction of persistence lengths (Fig. S3D).

Identification of the Nature of Critical Nuclei Required for Artificial Capsid Formation

In the experiments shown in Figure , nucleation and growth proceeds unimpeded as the DNA is in a relaxed state for fixed times, only to be stretched for a short time for imaging purposes. This precludes the observation of capsid nucleation with high temporal resolution. Therefore, we performed experiments to quantify polypeptide binding dynamics at the single-molecule level and at millisecond time scales. We keep the DNA at a fixed end-to-end distance of 15.5 μm and continuously monitor the fluorescence along the 16.5 μm contour length long DNA in the form of kymographs (Figure A). For these experiments, the fluorescence intensity of one dye molecule was established to be 12.0 ± 0.5 photons (see Methods and Fig. S4), with which the absolute number of bound polypeptides can be determined.[28]
Figure 3

Real-time polypeptide binding. (A) Kymographs showing progressive peptide binding for two different C–S10–B concentrations: 50 nM panel (i) and 200 nM panel (ii). The confocal scanning line-time is 30 ms, the yellow scale bar denotes 2 μm. (B) Cumulative polypeptide binding over time (data extracted from the kymograph integrated intensity over time). Average values from six kymographs at 200 nM (green dots) and five kymographs at 50 nM (yellow dots) are plotted. The data were fitted with a Langmuir adsorption model resulting in a polypeptide binding constant of K ≈ 7 × 108 M–1.

Real-time polypeptide binding. (A) Kymographs showing progressive peptide binding for two different C–S10–B concentrations: 50 nM panel (i) and 200 nM panel (ii). The confocal scanning line-time is 30 ms, the yellow scale bar denotes 2 μm. (B) Cumulative polypeptide binding over time (data extracted from the kymograph integrated intensity over time). Average values from six kymographs at 200 nM (green dots) and five kymographs at 50 nM (yellow dots) are plotted. The data were fitted with a Langmuir adsorption model resulting in a polypeptide binding constant of K ≈ 7 × 108 M–1. As DNA compaction progresses, high forces quickly develop that most likely decreases polypeptides binding and halts DNA condensation on the stretched DNA. Indeed, the number of bound capsid polypeptides as a function of time, shown in Figure B for two polypeptide concentrations, plateaus after about 5 min, at levels far below saturation (see Figure A). With the assumption that the stretching mainly influences the maximum number of bound polypeptides, but not the binding dynamics, these data were analyzed using a simple reversible Langmuir adsorption kinetics model[29] (Supporting Information). This resulted in an effective binding free energy of ∼25 times the thermal energy, which is of the same order of magnitude as earlier estimates for VLP growth.[9,30] The calibrated kymograph data yields distributions of the number of polypeptides involved in each binding event. From Figure A it can be seen that at 50 nM the most frequent cluster size is a trimer, whereas at 200 nM it is a hexamer. By tracking single traces to obtain mean-square displacements[31] of polypeptide clusters moving on the DNA over time, we extracted diffusion constants of polypeptide clusters bound to the DNA as a function of cluster size (Figure B). We find that small clusters slide along the DNA, while large clusters are essentially immobilized on the DNA. The mobility of clusters drops to essentially zero for pentameric and larger oligomers (D ≤ 0.1 × 10–2 μm2/s). The observed decrease of the diffusion constant with cluster size is much steeper than is expected for a simple linear scaling of the sliding friction with oligomer size (see Fig. S3C), suggesting strong interactions of the large oligomers with the DNA and likely conformational integration into growing VLPs.
Figure 4

Polypeptide size quantification and their mobility along the DNA. (A) Quantification of single photobleaching steps allows an estimation of the number of polypeptides bound per recorded event. The binding-event size statistics produces a histogram with a broad range of binding sizes. At 50 nM, the first observed peak fits with trimer binding (Gaussian peak, 3.0 ± 0.4 polypeptides). At 200 nM, the first observed peak fits with hexamer binding (6.0 ± 0.3 polypeptides). (B) Diffusion constant D of the tracked binding events in the kymographs reveals an initial, drastic drop with increasing oligomer size, leveling off for oligomer sizes of ≥5 polypeptides (gray background area highlights the mobile events, error bars SEM). Inset: example of single binding events indicating that oligomer growth is more likely (90% traces) to take place when starting off with a large cluster (>5-mer, red curve) than with a small cluster (gray curve in the example, 10% traces).

Polypeptide size quantification and their mobility along the DNA. (A) Quantification of single photobleaching steps allows an estimation of the number of polypeptides bound per recorded event. The binding-event size statistics produces a histogram with a broad range of binding sizes. At 50 nM, the first observed peak fits with trimer binding (Gaussian peak, 3.0 ± 0.4 polypeptides). At 200 nM, the first observed peak fits with hexamer binding (6.0 ± 0.3 polypeptides). (B) Diffusion constant D of the tracked binding events in the kymographs reveals an initial, drastic drop with increasing oligomer size, leveling off for oligomer sizes of ≥5 polypeptides (gray background area highlights the mobile events, error bars SEM). Inset: example of single binding events indicating that oligomer growth is more likely (90% traces) to take place when starting off with a large cluster (>5-mer, red curve) than with a small cluster (gray curve in the example, 10% traces). Further analysis of the intensity of the polypeptide clusters reveals that those clusters that are smaller than pentamers only grow in 10% of the cases. For pentameric and larger clusters, this occurs in 90% of the cases (Figure B, inset). Previously, it has been shown that a minimal number of polypeptides need to simultaneously bind to the DNA in order to nucleate particle growth.[21] This should also mean that for very short DNA, covered by fewer proteins than the critical nucleus, the binding strength of the proteins should drop to lower values. Indeed, a bulk electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) confirms that binding of the artificial capsid polypeptides is strongly dependent on the length of the DNA template in the range of 10 bp to 1000 bp (Fig. S5). Taken together, our data strongly suggests that preformed oligomers bind to the DNA, and that pentamers, if bound to the DNA, should be considered as the critical nuclei for the productive formation of VLPs.

Nature and Dynamics of DNA Condensation during Capsid Growth

The combined fluorescence microscopy and optical tweezers experiments discussed previously are suboptimal for studying capsid growth. This is because (i) the many nuclei on the long DNA (Fig. S1C) make it difficult to follow growth of each of them, and (ii) growth of the nuclei cannot be followed over a sufficiently long time due to photo bleaching. Therefore, as a complementary real-time, single-particle technique, we apply acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS). AFS allows us to probe end-to-end distances for short DNA molecules tethered between a surface and a microbead (see schematic in Figure A) as a function of time (up to hours), for a fixed low force and with high temporal resolution (50 Hz).[32] Since the DNA used in the AFS experiment is short (2.9 kbp ≈ 1 μm), growth of viruslike particles is initiated from one or at most two nuclei (Fig. S1A,B), allowing us to follow growth in much greater detail. Data for multiple DNA strands is acquired simultaneously, leading to superior statistics.
Figure 5

Acoustic force spectroscopy reveals particles compaction dynamics. (A) Illustrative image of the AFS setup. DNA tethered microspheres are pushed along an acoustically generated pressure gradient (blue/white background) that applies a long and stable low-force clamp. (B) Decrease in DNA end-to-end length over time is a measure of the DNA compaction. The light blue background indicates the flushing in of peptides into the flow-cell while a stretching force of 15 pN is applied. The gray background area indicates a constant applied force of 1.5 pN. Inset: close-up of a compaction trace with the green line of the fit showing the compaction steps found with a previously developed step finding algorithm.[33] (C) Step size statistics of compaction events at different conditions: 50 nM polypeptides–1 μm DNA (top histogram), 1 μM polypeptides–1 μm DNA (middle histogram), and 1 μM polypeptides–3 μm DNA (bottom histogram). The negative steps obtained at lower concentration (top histogram) are decompaction events, which shows a symmetrical distribution. The compaction event data are fitted with a multi-Gaussian function, where the distances from peaks-to-peak are equally spaced and used as one fit parameter.

Acoustic force spectroscopy reveals particles compaction dynamics. (A) Illustrative image of the AFS setup. DNA tethered microspheres are pushed along an acoustically generated pressure gradient (blue/white background) that applies a long and stable low-force clamp. (B) Decrease in DNA end-to-end length over time is a measure of the DNA compaction. The light blue background indicates the flushing in of peptides into the flow-cell while a stretching force of 15 pN is applied. The gray background area indicates a constant applied force of 1.5 pN. Inset: close-up of a compaction trace with the green line of the fit showing the compaction steps found with a previously developed step finding algorithm.[33] (C) Step size statistics of compaction events at different conditions: 50 nM polypeptides–1 μm DNA (top histogram), 1 μM polypeptides–1 μm DNA (middle histogram), and 1 μM polypeptides–3 μm DNA (bottom histogram). The negative steps obtained at lower concentration (top histogram) are decompaction events, which shows a symmetrical distribution. The compaction event data are fitted with a multi-Gaussian function, where the distances from peaks-to-peak are equally spaced and used as one fit parameter. After confirming that results for the effective persistence lengths obtained from force–extension curves obtained by optical tweezers agree with those obtained from force–extension curves obtained by AFS (Fig. S6A,B), we apply AFS to probe in detail the nature and dynamics of DNA condensation during capsid growth. The DNA condensation is observed in real-time by measuring the end-to-end distance of DNA molecules kept at fixed low force of 1.5 pN and in the presence of artificial capsid polypeptides. Surprisingly, we find that DNA condensation into viruslike particles proceeds in a stepwise fashion (Figure B, inset). A multi-Gaussian distribution with equally spaced peak distances is fitted to the extracted step sizes. The short DNA (≈ 1 μm) reveals a sharp peak at a step size of 30 ± 1 nm in DNA contour length for both low (50 nM) as high (1 μM) C–S10–B concentrations (Figure C). This shows that the most probable step size for the condensation process is concentration independent. At low polypeptide concentrations, we also find decondensation steps, recorded as negative steps. Remarkably, the most probable step sizes for condensation and decondensation appear equal, not only at low forces but also if we increase the tension in order to induce decondensation (Fig. S6C). Employing a 3-fold longer DNA (8.3 kbp ≈ 3 μm), the step-size distribution has much less pronounced peaks, which we attribute to the presence of multiple growing nuclei on the longer DNA. In this case, simultaneous steps at multiple locations cannot be deconvoluted and are detected as larger steps (Figure C).

Discussion

The self-assembly pathway of even relatively simple viruses, such as the tobacco mosaic virus that consists of a single-stranded RNA packaged by a large number of identical copies of coat protein, is highly complex. It is only partially understood and in fact remains the object of controversy.[9] At least in part this is due to the circumstance that capsid assembly pathways are difficult to address other than with real-time, single-particle methods. Two unresolved issues are considered in this work: the nature of the critical nuclei for productive capsid formation and the dynamics and nature of nucleic acid condensation during capsid growth. For a simple artificial capsid polypeptide model system, which mimics essential features of the assembly of the much more complicated natural tobacco mosaic virus, we have shown that powerful, real-time, single molecule techniques can be used to successfully address such issues. For these artificial capsid polypeptides, we have shown that a broad range of preformed polypeptide oligomers can directly bind the DNA. As described by classical nucleation theory of protein capsids, a nucleus with a certain critical size has to be reached to trigger capsid formation, which seems to be true for spherical and rodlike assemblies alike.[14,21,34,35] We find that binding events of oligomers consisting of less than five polypeptides typically do not lead to particle growth. These oligomers, when bound, slide along the DNA with a mobility that rapidly decreases with increasing oligomer size. Binding events of oligomers consisting of minimally five polypeptides seem to be required for triggering nucleocapsid growth. Such oligomers, when bound to the DNA, are essentially immobile. Therefore, we conclude that pentamers bound to the DNA template may be considered to be the critical nuclei for the formation of the artificial capsids. The smaller-sized oligomers (<5) that can slide along the DNA may assist the growth process. Indeed, proteins sliding along a nucleic acid molecule during viral assembly is theoretically shown to considerably accelerate the self-assembly of natural icosahedral viruses.[36,37] The nature and dynamics of DNA condensation during capsid growth was successfully addressed using AFS, for it allows probing end-to-end distances of multiple short DNAs over prolonged periods of time and under a precisely controlled low force. Surprisingly, we have established that DNA condensation into the artificial capsids occurs in discrete single compaction events, with approximately 30 nm of DNA contour length being condensed in each compaction event. This characteristic length of DNA per compaction event seems to be largely independent of the protein concentration and therefore also independent of nuclei size. Also, decondensation steps at low protein concentrations show the same characteristic length, suggesting that this length of DNA must corresponds to a characteristic structure of condensed DNA in the rod-shaped artificial viral capsid. The filamentous core of the VLP is formed by the silklike middle blocks S10 of the C–S10–B artificial capsid polypeptide, which assemble into a stack of beta-solenoids (Figure A,B). Each beta-solenoid sheet has a dimension of ≈2.0 nm × 2.6 nm and a height of ≈0.6 nm, as predicted by computer simulations.[38,39] The binding blocks B and stability block C emanate from the filamentous core. From this we expect that the DNA is confined to a condensation region extending at most a few nanometers away from the filamentous core (Figure ), since the flexible dodecalysine binding blocks B can only extend up to that distance. Such a structure is consistent with the height of the VLPs found using AFM imaging in liquid (Fig. S1C), which show an average particle height of ≈9 nm.
Figure 6

Conformation of condensed DNA. (A) Sheetlike beta-solenoid conformation of folded silk block S10 = (GAGAGAGQ)10 with approximate dimensions, as predicted by computer simulations.[38] (B) Filamentous core of the VLPs is formed through stacking of the sheetlike folded silk blocks. (C) Region of DNA condensation extends from just outside the filamentous core up to the distance the flexible oligolysine binding blocks B = K12 can stretch away from the filamentous core from which they emanate, which is a few nanometers. Binding to the highly localized binding blocks may lead to different condensed conformations of the DNA such as a helical winding around the filamentous core of the VLP, as suggested by the observation of regular condensation and decondensation steps of 30 nm of DNA contour length.

Conformation of condensed DNA. (A) Sheetlike beta-solenoid conformation of folded silk block S10 = (GAGAGAGQ)10 with approximate dimensions, as predicted by computer simulations.[38] (B) Filamentous core of the VLPs is formed through stacking of the sheetlike folded silk blocks. (C) Region of DNA condensation extends from just outside the filamentous core up to the distance the flexible oligolysine binding blocks B = K12 can stretch away from the filamentous core from which they emanate, which is a few nanometers. Binding to the highly localized binding blocks may lead to different condensed conformations of the DNA such as a helical winding around the filamentous core of the VLP, as suggested by the observation of regular condensation and decondensation steps of 30 nm of DNA contour length. The question arises what conformation the DNA adopts in the condensation region close to the filamentous core of the VLPs. For DNA packed into icosahedral spaces such as in T4 and T7 bacteriophages, it has convincingly been shown that the experimentally observed spool-like DNA configuration can be explained purely in terms of nanogeometric confinement.[40−42] In other cases, binding to capsid proteins may induce nucleic acid template deformations that would not be expected on the basis of geometric confinement alone. For example, the helical arrangement of the RNA genome in TMV virus particles is dictated by their binding to the capsid proteins rather than by geometric confinement.[43] For our artificial viruslike particles, it has previously been shown that particle lengths are roughly one-third of the DNA contour length.[20] If the DNA conformation inside the artificial viruslike particles considered here is determined by geometric nanoconfinement alone, the most plausible conformation would be that of parallel double stranded DNAs with hairpin bending defects, as illustrated in Fig. S7. Such conformations minimize the bending energy of semiflexible chains in finite length tubular confinement, for tube diameters much less than the persistence length, as predicted in recent computer simulations[44] and demonstrated by the theoretical estimates of eqs S10–S12. Such conformations are also similar to the conformations adopted by DNA confined in nanochannels.[45] However, binding of the DNA to the highly localized binding blocks that emanate from the filamentous core may induce strong DNA deformations that in turn lead to DNA conformations very different from those predicted for confinement of the DNA in a finite nanotube. Indeed, the observed 30 nm steps are suggestive of a stepwise helical winding of the DNA around the filamentous core of the viruslike particle during its growth in the AFS experiment, illustrated in Figure C. If we assume that the characteristic contour length of 30 nm corresponds to a single helical winding, this would imply a radius of the helix of 4.5 nm, and a radius of curvature of 5.1 nm, to arrive at a distance between the helical windings of 10 nm, consistent with the observed packing parameter of 3 (Fig. S8). This helical arrangement is large enough for the DNA to wind around the filamentous core of the VLP yet small enough to be within the region into which the binding blocks can extend. Interestingly, a DNA molecule wrapped around histones has a similar radius of curvature.[46] To summarize, we have presented a unique combination of complementary, dynamic techniques for assembly studies of both VLPs and naturally evolved virus particles. We have used these techniques to address key issues regarding capsid assembly pathways that are difficult to address other than with real-time, single-particle methods: the nature of the critical nuclei for productive capsid formation and the dynamics and nature of nucleic acid condensation during capsid formation. Albeit our study focuses on nucleocapsid formation by simple artificial polypeptides, it does pave the way for the detailed real-time in vitro studies of the assembly of naturally evolved viruses at the single-particle level.

Methods

Viruslike Particle Capsid Polypeptides

The polypeptide, C–S10–B, consists of three blocks that each encode a specific physicochemical functionality, mimicking corresponding functionalities of viral capsid proteins. Nucleic acid binding is achieved through interactions with block B that consists of 12 positively charged lysines. The silklike middle blocks S10 = (GAGAGAGQ)10 fold into a sheetlike beta-solenoid conformation[35,47] (Figure A), and stacking of these sheets leads to the formation of a rigid protein filament that forms the core of the VLP.[20] Folding of an initially unfolded silk block into the beta-solenoid conformation is promoted by docking onto an already existing folded silk block, such that the formation of the rod-shaped protein core is a nucleated process.[20,21,35] Finally, a hydrophilic random-coil C, with a collagen-like sequence C = (GXY)132 (where X and Y are mostly hydrophilic uncharged amino acids[48]) provides colloidal stability to the rod-shaped VLPs. Immediately after dissolution, the silk blocks of C–S10–B polypeptides are still unfolded, but over time they fold and stack, a process that is strongly promoted by binding to the nucleic acid templates, such that coassembly with nucleic acid templates is favored over capsid protein-only assembly.[20] The biosyntethic capsid polypeptides were provided as lyophilized protein polymer powder (C–S10–B = 44.7492 kDa), produced as previously described.[20] For additional sample preparation details, see the Supporting Information.

Atomic Force Microscopy

Viruslike particles were imaged in peak force tapping mode on a Bruker Bioscope catalyst setup, unless otherwise stated. Peptides and DNA were incubated with a final charge ratio N/P = 3 (molar ratio between positively charged NH2 groups from the binding block to negatively charged PO3 groups of the DNA template (P)), in 10 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.5. Viruslike particles were adhered to freshly cleaved mica treated with 5 mM TRIS and 0.5 mM Mg2+ solution. For additional info on sample preparation for experiments in air and in liquid, see the Supporting Information. AFM image processing was performed with NanoScope Analysis 1.5 software for both a first order imaging flattening and the particles height estimation.

Optical Tweezers with Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

The dual-trap optical tweezers setup with integrated confocal fluorescence microscopy (LUMICKS) is similar to an optical setup used for dual-trap optical trapping experiments in combination with confocal fluorescence and a microfluidics flow-cell the has been described previously.[49] End-biotinylated bacteriophage λ DNA was connected to streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads (diameter = 4.5 μm, Spherotech) to generate the DNA constructs, as described previously.[50] For sample preparation and kymograph recording settings, see the Supporting Information. Binding of single peptides was followed through kymograph analysis quantifying their fluorescence signal (average number of photons) when landing on the DNA. All values were background corrected. We processed the kymographs through single-molecule tracking to acquire information on the binding events intensity and mobility. Photo bleaching allows one to calibrate the intensity of a single fluorophore (12.0 ± 0.5 photons) by looking at single fluorescence decrease steps of single photobleached dyes,[28,51−53] see Fig. S3. The one-dimensional diffusion of protein complexes along the DNA was quantified by tracking the peptides traces and calculating their diffusion coefficient (D) by using a mean square displacement analysis (MSD).[31] Force–distance curves and confocal fluorescence data were analyzed using a custom-written MATLAB software, using the extensible wormlike chain model (eWLC),[54] which describes the dsDNA elastic behavior up to ∼30 pN, is used to fit FDCs and estimate the DNA effective persistence length Lp: .

Acoustic Force Spectroscopy

The home-built AFS setup[32,55] and the AFS flow-cell (LUMICKS) and tethers preparation[55] have been previously described. The 8.4 kbp DNA was obtained from a pKYBI vector, as previously described.[55] For the preparation of functionalized DNA samples and flow-cell preparation, see the Supporting Information. AFS data were analyzed using a custom-written LABVIEW software, and the step-analysis was performed with a custom-made change-point analysis software.[33] Processed data were analyzed using Origin. In the Gaussian fit in Figure C, the peak-to-peak distances obtained are 22.6 ± 2, 21.3 ± 0.4, and 21 ± 0.3 nm for the histograms from top to bottom. The light blue backgrounds highlight the mean of the first two Gaussian peaks. In the main text, these values are corrected for the force applied during the experiments and the observed change in the effective Lp, resulting in an average step of 30 nm.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

EMSAs were performed to determine the effect of the dsDNA length on the protein binding. For sample preparation details, see the Supporting Information. The samples were loaded on 20% acrylamide gels in 1× TAE buffer and run at 70 V for 90 min. Gels were in a gel documentation system and analyzed with ImageJ. the N/P ratio for 50% binding of DNA (KDapp) by the protein was calculated fitting the DNA free intensities to the Hill equation, , with n as the Hill constant.
  49 in total

1.  The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core.

Authors:  Timothy J Richmond; Curt A Davey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Understanding the concentration dependence of viral capsid assembly kinetics--the origin of the lag time and identifying the critical nucleus size.

Authors:  Michael F Hagan; Oren M Elrad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Combining optical tweezers, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, and microfluidics for studies of DNA-protein interactions.

Authors:  Peter Gross; Géraldine Farge; Erwin J G Peterman; Gijs J L Wuite
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Mechanisms of capsid assembly around a polymer.

Authors:  Aleksandr Kivenson; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Kinetics of viral self-assembly: role of the single-stranded RNA antenna.

Authors:  Tao Hu; B I Shklovskii
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-05-01

6.  Visualizing single DNA-bound proteins using DNA as a scanning probe.

Authors:  Maarten C Noom; Bram van den Broek; Joost van Mameren; Gijs J L Wuite
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-11-11       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Nanoscale insight into silk-like protein self-assembly: effect of design and number of repeat units.

Authors:  Jamoliddin Razzokov; Saber Naderi; Paul van der Schoot
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Self-Assembly Dynamics of Linear Virus-Like Particles: Theory and Experiment.

Authors:  Melle T J J M Punter; Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Daniela J Kraft; Renko de Vries; Paul van der Schoot
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Viral genome structures are optimal for capsid assembly.

Authors:  Jason D Perlmutter; Cong Qiao; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Illuminating the Reaction Pathways of Viromimetic Assembly.

Authors:  Hande E Cingil; Emre B Boz; Giovanni Biondaro; Renko de Vries; Martien A Cohen Stuart; Daniela J Kraft; Paul van der Schoot; Joris Sprakel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  10 in total

1.  A kinetic model for the impact of packaging signal mimics on genome encapsulation.

Authors:  René de Bruijn; Pieta Cornelia Martha Wielstra; Carlos Calcines-Cruz; Tom van Waveren; Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Paul van der Schoot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  Visualization of Single Molecules Building a Viral Capsid Protein Lattice through Stochastic Pathways.

Authors:  Alejandro Valbuena; Sourav Maity; Mauricio G Mateu; Wouter H Roos
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Nature of Amorphous Hydrophilic Block Affects Self-Assembly of an Artificial Viral Coat Polypeptide.

Authors:  Lione Willems; Larissa van Westerveld; Stefan Roberts; Isaac Weitzhandler; Carlos Calcines Cruz; Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Ashutosh Chilkoti; Enrico Mastrobattista; John van der Oost; Renko de Vries
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 4.  In Vitro Assembly of Virus-Like Particles and Their Applications.

Authors:  Dinh To Le; Kristian M Müller
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10

5.  Virus self-assembly proceeds through contact-rich energy minima.

Authors:  Pedro Buzón; Sourav Maity; Panagiotis Christodoulis; Monique J Wiertsema; Steven Dunkelbarger; Christine Kim; Gijs J L Wuite; Adam Zlotnick; Wouter H Roos
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Polymorphic self-assembly of helical tubules is kinetically controlled.

Authors:  Huang Fang; Botond Tyukodi; W Benjamin Rogers; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 7.  Strategies to Build Hybrid Protein-DNA Nanostructures.

Authors:  Armando Hernandez-Garcia
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  Physical virology: From virus self-assembly to particle mechanics.

Authors:  Pedro Buzón; Sourav Maity; Wouter H Roos
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-01-20

9.  Rapidly Forming Early Intermediate Structures Dictate the Pathway of Capsid Assembly.

Authors:  Roi Asor; Christopher John Schlicksup; Zhongchao Zhao; Adam Zlotnick; Uri Raviv
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  Physics of viral dynamics.

Authors:  Robijn F Bruinsma; Gijs J L Wuite; Wouter H Roos
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.