Kinetic parameters kex (s-1) and kex/Kd (M-1 s-1) are reported for exchange for deuterium in D2O of the C-6 hydrogen of 5-fluororotidine 5'-monophosphate (FUMP) catalyzed by the Q215A, Y217F, and Q215A/Y217F variants of yeast orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (ScOMPDC) at pD 8.1, and by the Q215A variant at pD 7.1-9.3. The pD rate profiles for wildtype ScOMPDC and the Q215A variant are identical, except for a 2.5 log unit downward displacement in the profile for the Q215A variant. The Q215A, Y217F and Q215A/Y217F substitutions cause 1.3-2.0 kcal/mol larger increases in the activation barrier for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange compared with decarboxylation, because of the stronger apparent side chain interaction with the transition state for the deuterium exchange reaction. The stabilization of the transition state for the OMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP is ca. 19 kcal/mol smaller than the transition state for decarboxylation of OMP, and ca. 8 kcal/mol smaller than for OMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP to form the vinyl carbanion intermediate common to OMPDC-catalyzed reactions OMP/FOMP and UMP/FUMP. We propose that ScOMPDC shows similar stabilizing interactions with the common portions of decarboxylation and deprotonation transition states that lead to formation of this vinyl carbanion intermediate, and that there is a large ca. (19-8) = 11 kcal/mol stabilization of the former transition state from interactions with the nascent CO2 of product. The effects of Q215A and Y217F substitutions on kcat/Km for decarboxylation of OMP are expressed mainly as an increase in Km for the reactions catalyzed by the variant enzymes, while the effects on kex/Kd for deuterium exchange are expressed mainly as an increase in kex. This shows that the Q215 and Y217 side chains stabilize the Michaelis complex to OMP for the decarboxylation reaction, compared with the complex to FUMP for the deuterium exchange reaction. These results provide strong support for the conclusion that interactions which stabilize the transition state for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation at a nonpolar enzyme active site dominate over interactions that destabilize the ground-state Michaelis complex.
Kinetic parameters kex (s-1) and kex/Kd (M-1 s-1) are reported for exchange for deuterium in D2O of the C-6 hydrogen of 5-fluororotidine 5'-monophosphate (FUMP) catalyzed by the Q215A, Y217F, and Q215A/Y217F variants of yeastorotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (ScOMPDC) at pD 8.1, and by the Q215A variant at pD 7.1-9.3. The pD rate profiles for wildtype ScOMPDC and the Q215A variant are identical, except for a 2.5 log unit downward displacement in the profile for the Q215A variant. The Q215A, Y217F and Q215A/Y217F substitutions cause 1.3-2.0 kcal/mol larger increases in the activation barrier for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange compared with decarboxylation, because of the stronger apparent side chain interaction with the transition state for the deuterium exchange reaction. The stabilization of the transition state for the OMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP is ca. 19 kcal/mol smaller than the transition state for decarboxylation of OMP, and ca. 8 kcal/mol smaller than for OMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP to form the vinyl carbanion intermediate common to OMPDC-catalyzed reactions OMP/FOMP and UMP/FUMP. We propose that ScOMPDC shows similar stabilizing interactions with the common portions of decarboxylation and deprotonation transition states that lead to formation of this vinyl carbanion intermediate, and that there is a large ca. (19-8) = 11 kcal/mol stabilization of the former transition state from interactions with the nascent CO2 of product. The effects of Q215A and Y217F substitutions on kcat/Km for decarboxylation of OMP are expressed mainly as an increase in Km for the reactions catalyzed by the variant enzymes, while the effects on kex/Kd for deuterium exchange are expressed mainly as an increase in kex. This shows that the Q215 and Y217 side chains stabilize the Michaelis complex to OMP for the decarboxylation reaction, compared with the complex to FUMP for the deuterium exchange reaction. These results provide strong support for the conclusion that interactions which stabilize the transition state for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation at a nonpolar enzyme active site dominate over interactions that destabilize the ground-state Michaelis complex.
Orotidine
5′-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) catalyzes
the decarboxylation of OMP and 5-fluororotidine 5′-monophosphate
(FOMP) to form uridine 5′-monophosphate (UMP) and FUMP, respectively (Scheme ).[1−4] The enzyme mechanism of action
has been a subject of intense interest because the protein catalyst
provides an enormous 31 kcal/mol stabilization of the decarboxylation
transition state, and a large selectivity in binding the reaction
transition state with a higher affinity than the 8 kcal/mol binding
energy of substrate OMP.[5]
Scheme 1
Decarboxylation
Reactions Catalyzed by OMPDC
OMPDC also catalyzes the exchange of the C-6 hydrogen of UMP,[6,7] 5-fluororotidine 5′-monophosphate
(FUMP),[6,7] or the truncated substrate 1-(β-d-erythrofuranosyl)-5-fluorororotic acid (FEO)[8] with deuterium from solvent D2O. A
comparison of the kinetic parameters for enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation
and deuterium exchange shows that OMPDC provides strong stabilization
of the common UMP vinyl carbanion reaction intermediate.
This is consistent with the conclusion that the first step in the
deuterium exchange reaction, deprotonation of enzyme-bound UMP or FUMP (Figure ), is the reverse of protonation of the vinyl carbanion intermediate
of the decarboxylation reaction.
Figure 1
OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and FOMP, and deuterium exchange reactions
of UMP and FUMP, through common UMP or FUMP vinyl carbanion intermediates.
OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and FOMP, and deuterium exchange reactions
of UMP and FUMP, through common UMP or FUMP vinyl carbanion intermediates.There has been progress toward defining the roles of amino
acid
side chains at yeastOMPDC (ScOMPDC) in the stabilization
of the rate-determining decarboxylation transition state.[1,9−14] We have focused on the contribution to catalysis of binding interactions
between ScOMPDC and the substrate phosphodianion,
which drive the large protein conformational change shown in Figure , from an inactive
flexible form of ScOMPDC to the stiff active form
that provides an optimal stabilization of the decarboxylation transition
state.[13,15−17] This conformational
change is driven by interactions of the OMPphosphodianion
with the side chains of Q215 and Y217 from a gripper loop, with the
guanidine cation side chain of R235 (Figure ), and by an intraloop clamping interaction
between the S154 and Q215 side chains.[18] The contribution of these side chains to the enzymatic rate acceleration
was determined for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP,[9,11]FOMP,[9,10] and for decarboxylation of the phosphodianion truncated substrates
1-(β-d-erythrofuranosyl)orotic acid (EO)[13] and 1-(β-d-erythrofuranosyl)-5-fluorororotic
acid (FEO).[19] The results
show that the S154, Q215, and R235 side chains provide a total 10
kcal/mol stabilization of the transition state for decarboxylation
of OMP, but a < 1 kcal/mol stabilization
of the transition state for decarboxylation of EO.[13] This shows that the observed transition state
stabilization is from interactions of the Q215, Y217, and R235 side
chains with bound dianions, and that there is no transition state
stabilization from interactions with the distant pyrimidine ring.[13] The results provide strong evidence that the
side chains function to stabilize the closed form of ScOMPDC that shows a high reactivity toward decarboxylation of OMP.[15,20]
Figure 2
Representations of the X-ray crystal structures
of ScOMPDC from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScOMPDC). The left-hand and middle surface structures
show, respectively,
the open unliganded form of ScOMPDC (PDB entry 1DQW) and the closed
form with 6-hydroxyuridine 5′-monophosphate bound (PDB entry 1DQX). The phosphodianion
gripper (residues 202–220) and pyrimidine umbrella loops (residues
151–165) are shaded blue, and the side chain from R235 is shaded
green in both structures. The right-hand structure (PDB entry 1DQX) shows the interactions
of Q215, Y217, and R235 with the phosphodianion of 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate, and the clamping interaction between the
Q215 side chain and the S154 side chain from the phosphodianion gripper
and the pyrimidine umbrella loops.
Representations of the X-ray crystal structures
of ScOMPDC from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScOMPDC). The left-hand and middle surface structures
show, respectively,
the open unliganded form of ScOMPDC (PDB entry 1DQW) and the closed
form with 6-hydroxyuridine 5′-monophosphate bound (PDB entry 1DQX). The phosphodianion
gripper (residues 202–220) and pyrimidine umbrella loops (residues
151–165) are shaded blue, and the side chain from R235 is shaded
green in both structures. The right-hand structure (PDB entry 1DQX) shows the interactions
of Q215, Y217, and R235 with the phosphodianion of 6-hydroxyuridine
5′-monophosphate, and the clamping interaction between the
Q215 side chain and the S154 side chain from the phosphodianion gripper
and the pyrimidine umbrella loops.The enzyme conformational change has also been proposed to promote
decarboxylation through the induction of electrostatic stress into
the substrate carboxylate that is relieved at the decarboxylation
transition state,[21−23] and by distorting the bond to the substrate carboxylate
∼36° out of the plane of the pyrimidine ring.[4,24−27] The results of our earlier studies have provided no evidence for
the utilization of phosphodianion binding energy to introduce interactions
that destabilize enzyme-bound OMP at yeastOMPDC, but
they have not focused on the evaluation of ground-state effects.The relative binding affinity to ScOMPDC reported
for OMP, the product UMP,[28] and for inhibitors[29−31] are difficult to reconcile with
the proposal that the Michaelis complex to OMP is destabilized
by interactions with ScOMPDC. For example, the ca.
200-fold weaker binding affinity of product UMP compared
with substrate OMP shows that the Michaelis complex to OMP is stabilized by interactions between the enzyme and substrate
carboxylate group.[28] The significance of
these binding studies has been challenged,[32] and the 50 year old proposal that enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation
is promoted by interactions that destabilize the reaction ground state[33−38] remains entrenched, despite being strongly disputed.[39−41] The disputes are largely theoretical in nature, and there have been
few experimental studies on this problem.The role of ground-state
destabilization in decarboxylation catalyzed
by ScOMPDC is examined here by comparing the effect
of amino acid substitutions at dianion gripper side chains Q215 and
Y217 (Figure ) on
the kinetic parameters for the enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, where ground state effects are proposed to be important,
with kinetic parameters for the deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP (Figure ) that lacks the −CO2–. Substitutions
of dianion gripper side chains that introduce destabilizing interactions
into bound OMP should reduce ground-state destabilization,
and result in decreases in kcat and in Km for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation,
but there can be no ground-state effects on the corresponding kinetic
parameters for the ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange
reactions of FUMP.We report the effect of Q215A,
Y217F and Q215A/Y217F substitutions
on the kinetic parameters for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions of FUMP. These results build upon
an earlier study of the effect of the R235A substitution.[12] A comparison of the effect of these substitutions
on catalysis of the decarboxylation and deuterium exchange reactions
shows that each protein substitution results in a (1.3–2.0)-kcal/mol larger increase in the activation barrier to the deuterium
exchange compared to decarboxylation reaction. This is surprising,
because the ca 19 kcal/mol smaller total stabilization of the deuterium exchange compared with the
decarboxylation transition state is consistent with weaker transition
state stabilization from interactions with the protein catalyst.[6,7] Our analysis strongly supports the conclusion that the transition
states for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP/FOMP and for deprotonation of UMP/FUMP show
similar stabilizing interactions with the protein catalyst over the
shared portions of these substrates, and differ because OMPDC shows
robust binding interactions with the nascent CO2 product
at the decarboxylation transition state. This conclusion is generalized
to other enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation reactions, where the first
step is transfer of the substrate −CO2– from water to a hydrophobic protein binding pocket.[38,42−46]
Experimental Section
Materials
Glycylglycine
(GlyGly, >99%) was obtained
from USB. 3-(N-Morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS,
≥99.5%) was purchased from Fluka. The following deuterium labeled
compounds were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories: D2O (99.9%), DCl (35 wt %, 99.9% D), and NaOD (30 wt %, 98%D).
The water was distilled and purified on a Milli-Q water purification
system. The triethylammonium salt of FUMP was synthesized
as described in earlier work, and was converted to the free acid by
passage over Amberlite IR120 resin (H+-form) in methanol.[6] All other chemicals were reagent grade and were
used without further purification.
Preparation of Solutions
Solution pH and pD was determined
at 25 °C using an Orion model 720A pH meter equipped with a Radiometer
pHC4006-9 combination electrode that was standardized at pH 7.00 and
10.00 at 25 °C. The pD of buffers in D2O was obtained
by adding 0.4 to the reading on the pH meter.[47] The acidic protons of GlyGly were exchanged for deuterium by dissolving
the buffer in D2O, followed by evaporation and drying under
vacuum at 55 °C. Buffered solutions of imidazole were prepared
by dissolving the buffer base in D2O and adjusting to the
required pD using DCl. Buffered solutions of MOPS and GlyGly were
prepared by dissolving the commercial buffer in D2O and
adjusting to the required pD using NaOD.
Protein Variants of ScOMPDC
The plasmid pScODC-15b
containing the gene encoding ScOMPDC from Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a N-terminal His6- or His10-tag was available from previous studies.[14,48] The procedures for the preparation of the Q215A,[14] Y217F,[13] and Q215A/Y217F[13] variants were described in earlier work. In
all cases the N-terminal His6- or His10-tag
was removed by the action of thrombin (1 unit/mg ScOMPDC) at room temperature for ca. 16 h, as described in the Supporting
Information to ref (14). The protein variants of ScOMPDC were stored at
−80 °C. These enzymes were thawed and then dialyzed at
7 °C against 10 mM MOPS at pH 7.1 and I = 0.10
(NaCl). This was followed by exhaustive dialysis [at least 3 changes
in dialysis buffer] at 7 °C in D2O against 5–10
mL of the following buffers (I = 0.1, NaCl): pD 7.1,
50 mM imidazole; pD 7.4, 50 mM MOPS; pD 7.7, 50 mM MOPS; pD 8.1, 50
mM GlyGly; pD 9.3; 50 mM GlyGly. The dialysis was with a D-tube dialyzer
(10 kDa MWCO, Novagen) placed inside a narrow vessel that was isolated
from atmospheric moisture using parafilm. The concentration of stock
solutions of protein variants of ScOMPDC was determined
from the absorbance at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 29
900 M–1 cm–1, calculated using
the ProtParam tool available on the ExPASy server.[49,50] The activity of these protein variants was determined by monitoring
the decrease in absorbance at 279 nm during the enzyme-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP.[11]
Deuterium Exchange at C-6
of FUMP Monitored by 19F NMR
The exchange of the
C-6 proton of FUMP for deuterium from solvent D2O catalyzed by Q215A, Y217F,
Q215A/Y217F variants of ScOMPDC at 25 °C and I = 0.1 (NaCl) was monitored by following formation of deuterium
labeled product (d-FUMP). The reaction
mixtures (1–2 mL in D2O) were prepared by mixing
the stock enzyme solution with the appropriate buffer and NaCl to
give the desired enzyme, buffer and salt concentrations. The reactions
were initiated by the addition of FUMP in D2O. The following are the final reaction solutions for the Q215A variant
at (I = 0.1, NaCl): pD 7.1, 50 mM imidazole, 80–120
μM ScOMPDC at 1.0–10 mM FUMP; pD 7.4, 50 mM MOPS, 40–100 μM ScOMPDC
at 0.75–7.5 mM FUMP; pD 7.7, 50 mM MOPS, 20–80
μM ScOMPDC at 0.50–7.1 mM FUMP; pD 8.1, 50 mM GlyGly, 20–60 μM ScOMPDC at 0.48–7.5 mM FUMP; pD 9.3, 50 mM GlyGly,
15–100 μM ScOMPDC at 0.25–7.5
mM FUMP. The final solutions for the other protein variants
were at pD 8.1 (50 mM GlyGly, I = 0.10 NaCl): Y217A
variant, 10–20 μM ScOMPDC at 0.75–7.5
mM FUMP; Q215A/Y217A variant, 50–100 μM ScOMPDC at 2.5–5.0 mM FUMP.At
timed intervals aliquots of 100–500 μL were withdrawn
from the reaction solutions and quenched with 20 μL of neat
HCO2D. The ScOMPDC was removed by ultracentrifugation
using an Amicon Ultrafiltration device (10K MWCO). The volume of the
filtrate was adjusted to 700 μL in D2O and transferred
to an NMR tube for analyses. The reactions were followed for up to
several days, during which time no decrease (<10%) in enzyme activity
was observed. For selected reactions at high [FUMP] the
pD of the filtrate was determined, and in all cases was within 0.1
unit of the starting pD.The 19F NMR spectra were
obtained as described in previous
work, and the chemical shifts referenced to the value of −78.5
ppm for a neat solution of the trifuoroacetic acid external standard.[12] The integrated peak areas for the doublet with
area (AH) at −165.36 ppm for -FUMP and the broad upfield-shifted
apparent singlet with area (AD) at −165.66
ppm for -FUMP were recorded,
and the initial reaction velocity (vi, eq ) for enzyme-catalyzed
conversion of up to 10% of h-FUMP to d-FUMP was determined as the slopes of linear
plots of 3 or 4 values of fP[FUMP]o against time during disappearance of 3–10% of
total h-FUMP, where fP = AD/(AH + AD) is the fraction of
total FUMP labeled with deuterium at the C-6 position,
and [FUMP]o is the initial concentration of -FUMP.
Results
The ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reactions
of FUMP were monitored by 19F NMR spectroscopy
at 470 MHz, as described in an earlier study.[12]Figure shows the
dependence of vi/[E] on [FUMP], where vi is the initial velocity of
the deuterium exchange reactions catalyzed by the Q215A variant at
several different pD and a constant ionic strength of 0.1 (NaCl). Figure A,B show the dependence
of vi/[E] on [FUMP] for the
deuterium exchange reactions catalyzed by the Y217A and Q215A/Y217A
variants of ScOMPDC, respectively, at pD 8.1 (20
mM GlyGly) and I = 0.1 (NaCl). The data from Figures and 4A were fit to eq , derived for Scheme , to give values for the kinetic parameters kex and Kd. The data from Figure B were fit to a linear
form of eq (Kd ≫ [FUMP]) to give the
value of kex/Kd. Table reports
these kinetic parameters at pD 8.1, and previously determined values
of kcat and Km for wild type and variant forms ScOMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of OMP at pH 7.1.[11] The parameter Kd (Scheme ) is treated as a
thermodynamic dissociation constant, because formation of the Michaelis
complex to -UMP is effectively
reversible with respect to its slow (kex ≤ 10–2 s–1, Table ) conversion to -UMP.[6] The binding of OMP to OMPDC is partly irreversible
for decarboxylation catalyzed by the wild type enzyme (kcat = 16 s–1).[28] The parameter Km is used here to describe
the stability of the Michaelis complex. The values of the kinetic
parameters for Q215A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions of FUMP at several different pD are
reported in Table , along with previously determined values of the kinetic parameters
for the wild type ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange
reactions.[6]
Figure 3
Dependence of vi/[E] on [FUMP] for Q215A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions at I = 0.1 (NaCl). Key: (●),
pD 7.1 (50 mM imidazole buffer); (▼), pD 7.4 (50 mM MOPS buffer);
(⧫), pD 7.7 (50 mM MOPS buffer); (▲), pD 8.1 (50 mM
GlyGly buffer); (■) pD 9.3 (50 mM GlyGly buffer).
Figure 4
Dependence of vi/[E] on [FUMP] for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reactions
at pD 8.1 (50 mM GlyGly) and I = 0.1 (NaCl). (A)
Y217F variant; (B) Q215A/Y217A variant.
Scheme 2
Kinetic Mechanism for OMPDC-Catalyzed Deuterium
Exchange
Table 1
Kinetic Parameters at 25 °C for
Wild Type and Variant Forms of ScOMPDC-Catalyzed
Deuterium Exchange Reactions of FUMP at pD 8.1 and Decarboxylation
Reactions of OMP at pH 7.1a
FUMPb
OMPc
enzyme
kex (s–1)
Kd (mM)
kex/Kd (M–1 s–1)
kcat (s–1)
Km (M)
kcat/Km (M–1 s–1)
WT
4.4 × 10–2
0.11
400
15
1.4 × 10–6
1.1 × 107
Q215A
(4.3 ± 0.08) × 10–4
0.42 ± 0.03
1.0
24
0.94 x10–4
2.6 × 105
Y217F
(2.3 ± 0.14) × 10–3
5.8 ± 0.15
0.40
20
1.1 × 10–4
1.8 × 105
Q215A/Y217F
(3.9 ± 0.1) × 10–3
4.8
1.4 × 10–3
3.4 × 103
R235Ad
9.3 × 10–6
5.0 × 10–3
1.9 × 10–3
1.0
1.1 × 10–3
910
For ScOMPDC-catalyzed
deuterium exchange reactions at pD 8.1 (50 mM GlyGly) and I = 0.1 (NaCl) or ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
reactions at pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and I = 0.10 (NaCl).
Kinetic parameters defined
by Scheme . The uncertainty
in these values is the standard error from the least-squares fit of
the kinetic data to the appropriate kinetic equation.
Data from ref (11).
The data for the R235A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reaction is from ref (12).
Table 2
Kinetic Parameters at 25 °C for
Deuterium Exchange Reactions of FUMP Catalyzed by Q215A Variant ScOMPDC at Several pDa
Q215A ScOMPDCb,c
wild type ScOMPDCb
pDd
kex (s–1)
Kd (mM)
kex/Kd (M–1 s–1)
kex (s–1)
Kd (mM)
kex/Kd (M–1 s–1)
ΔΔG‡e kcal/mol
7.1 (7.03)
(2.7 ± 0.1) × 10–4
2.0 ± 0.2
0.13
1.7 × 10–2
0.51
33
3.3
7.4 (7.37)
(3.6 ± 0.1) × 10–4
0.70 ± 0.08
0.51
2.4 × 10–2
0.17
140
3.3
7.7 (7.64)
(4.1 ± 0.08) × 10–4
0.38 ± 0.04
1.08
3.2 × 10–2
0.11
300
3.3
8.1 (8.15)
(4.3 ± 0.08) × 10–4
0.42 ± 0.03
1.02
4.4 × 10–2
0.11
400
3.5
9.3 (9.33)
(3.0 ± 0.1) × 10–4
0.54 ± 0.03
0.56
3.8 × 10–2
0.19
200
3.6
For ScOMPDC-catalyzed
deuterium exchange reactions at I = 0.1 (NaCl) at:
pD 7.1, 50 mM imidazole buffer; pD 7.4. 50 mM MOPS buffer; pD 7.7,
50 mM MOPS buffer; pD 8.1, 50 mM GlyGly buffer; and, pD 9.3, 50 mM
GlyGly buffer.
Kinetic parameters
defined by Scheme .
The uncertainty in these
values
is the standard error from the least-squares fit of the kinetic data
to the appropriate kinetic equation.
The pDs in parentheses for the previous
study on the wild type ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reaction were reported to three significant figures.[6]
The
effect of the point substitution
on the activation barrier ΔG‡ for kex/Kd.
Dependence of vi/[E] on [FUMP] for Q215A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions at I = 0.1 (NaCl). Key: (●),
pD 7.1 (50 mM imidazole buffer); (▼), pD 7.4 (50 mM MOPS buffer);
(⧫), pD 7.7 (50 mM MOPS buffer); (▲), pD 8.1 (50 mM
GlyGly buffer); (■) pD 9.3 (50 mM GlyGly buffer).Dependence of vi/[E] on [FUMP] for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reactions
at pD 8.1 (50 mM GlyGly) and I = 0.1 (NaCl). (A)
Y217F variant; (B) Q215A/Y217A variant.For ScOMPDC-catalyzed
deuterium exchange reactions at pD 8.1 (50 mM GlyGly) and I = 0.1 (NaCl) or ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
reactions at pH 7.1 (30 mM MOPS) and I = 0.10 (NaCl).Kinetic parameters defined
by Scheme . The uncertainty
in these values is the standard error from the least-squares fit of
the kinetic data to the appropriate kinetic equation.Data from ref (11).The data for the R235A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium exchange reaction is from ref (12).For ScOMPDC-catalyzed
deuterium exchange reactions at I = 0.1 (NaCl) at:
pD 7.1, 50 mM imidazole buffer; pD 7.4. 50 mM MOPS buffer; pD 7.7,
50 mM MOPS buffer; pD 8.1, 50 mM GlyGly buffer; and, pD 9.3, 50 mM
GlyGly buffer.Kinetic parameters
defined by Scheme .The uncertainty in these
values
is the standard error from the least-squares fit of the kinetic data
to the appropriate kinetic equation.The pDs in parentheses for the previous
study on the wild type ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reaction were reported to three significant figures.[6]The
effect of the point substitution
on the activation barrier ΔG‡ for kex/Kd.
Discussion
Figure A,B show
pD rate profiles for kex/Kd (M–1 s–1) and kex (s–1), respectively, for
wild type and Q215A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions at C-6 of FUMP in D2O,
constructed using data from Table . There is a constant difference of ΔΔG‡ = 3.45 ± 0.15 kcal/mol (Table ) between the activation
barriers for the deuterium exchange reactions catalyzed by wild type
and Q215A variant ScOMPDC.[6] This shows that the Q215A substitution has no detectable effect
on the apparent pKas of the active site
side chains that govern the shape of these pD profiles. However, the
downward break at low pD is not well-defined for the pD profile of kcat values for the Q215A variant, because we
were unable to obtain kinetic parameters for this slow deuterium exchange
reaction at pD = 6.45. The kinetic data for the pD rate profiles for
wild type and Q215A variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuterium
exchange reactions at C-6 of FUMP in D2O reported
in Figure A,B were
fit to the kinetic Scheme previously described in a study on the exchange
reaction catalyzed by wildtype OMPDC, to give the same apparent values
for the ionization constants of enzyme catalytic side chains.[6]
Figure 5
Logarithmic rate profiles of kinetic parameters for ScOMPDC-catalyzed exchange for deuterium of the C-6 proton
of FUMP in D2O at 25 °C and I = 0.1 (NaCl). (A) Second-order rate constants kex/Kd (M–1 s–1) for reactions catalyzed by wild type ScOMPDC (●) and the Q215A variant (▼). (B)
First order rate constants kex (s–1) for reactions catalyzed by wild type ScOMPDC (●) and the Q215A variant (■). The solid lines
show that fits of these data to the kinetic Scheme described previously
for the reaction catalyzed by wild type OMPDC.[6]
Logarithmic rate profiles of kinetic parameters for ScOMPDC-catalyzed exchange for deuterium of the C-6 proton
of FUMP in D2O at 25 °C and I = 0.1 (NaCl). (A) Second-order rate constants kex/Kd (M–1 s–1) for reactions catalyzed by wild type ScOMPDC (●) and the Q215A variant (▼). (B)
First order rate constants kex (s–1) for reactions catalyzed by wild type ScOMPDC (●) and the Q215A variant (■). The solid lines
show that fits of these data to the kinetic Scheme described previously
for the reaction catalyzed by wild type OMPDC.[6]
ScOMPDC-Catalyzed Decarboxylation
and Deuterium
Exchange Reactions: Relative Rate Acceleration and Transition State
Stabilization
The rate acceleration for the decarboxylation
of OMP catalyzed by ScOMPDC at a standard state of 1
M OMPDC is 4 × 1022-fold. This is the ratio of kcat/Km = 1.1 ×
107 M–1 s–1 for decarboxylation
at the pH optimum of 7.1,[28,51] and an estimated k0 = 2.8 × 10–16 s–1 for uncatalyzed nonenzymatic decarboxylation of OMP
in water.[5] This corresponds to (ΔΔG‡)dc = 31 kcal/mol for the
stabilization of the transition state for nonenzymatic decarboxylation.[6] The second-order rate constant of kHO = 0.71 M–1 s–1 for
HO–-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP gives knon = [0.71 M–1 s–1][1.3 × 10–7 M] = 9
× 10–8 s–1 for nonenzymatic
deprotonation of FUMP at pH 7.1.[6] Combining this with kex/Kd = 33 M–1 s–1 for
the deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP catalyzed by ScOMPDC at pD 7.1, gives an enzymatic rate acceleration
of 4 × 109 fold and a transition state stabilization
of (ΔΔG‡)ex = 12 kcal/mol. The 5-F of FUMP results in similar 5.0
and 4.8 kcal/mol stabilization of the transition states for DO– and ScOMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation
of UMP, so that ScOMPDC provides a similar
stabilization of the transition states for the two nonenzymatic reactions.[6,10] This 12 kcal/mol transition state stabilization is 19 kcal/mol smaller
than the 31 kcal/mol transition state stabilization estimated for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP. [This 19 kcal/mol transition state stabilization is calculated
from a comparison of rate constants for the enzymatic and nonenzymatic
deprotonation reactions determined a pH or pD of 7.1. No attempt has
been made to correct for the uncertain deuterium isotope effects on
these reactions. By comparison, an estimate of 17 kcal/mol for this
transition state stabilization was reported in an earlier paper, using
the second order rate constant of kE =
2300 M–1 s–1 for OMPDC with the
catalytic side chains in their most reactive protonation states.[6] The 2 kcal/mol difference between these two estimates
does not affect the conclusion that OMPDC provides a substantially
greater stabilization of the decarboxylation compared with the proton
transfer transition state.]This analysis demonstrates a large
difference in the stabilization
of the transition states for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation and deuterium
exchange reactions. We view the 19 kcal/mol estimate for this difference
as qualitative rather than quantitative because of uncertainties in
the estimates of knon obtained by the
long extrapolation of rate date to 25 °C.[5] This difference in transition state stabilization for these two
reactions reflects one interaction that provides specific stabilization
of the transition state for decarboxylation of OMP, and
a second interaction that destabilizes the transition state for the
deuterium exchange reaction compared with direct deprotonation of FUMP.There is little or no activation barrier
for addition of CO2 to the vinyl carbanion intermediate
of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation,[52] so
that the reaction transition state is early for CO2 addition
and late for the reverse cleavage reaction. It is possible that the
barrier for “CO2 reversion” is so small that
some type of motion of CO2 away from the vinyl carbanion
is rate determining for decarboxylation, in which case CO2 will be fully formed at the rate-determining transition state.[52,53] This late CO2-like transition state for decarboxylation
is stabilized by binding interactions with the CO2/-CO2– of OMP at the hydrophobic
binding pocket described below, but CO2 is not present
during OMPDC-catalyzed the deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP (Figure ). The values
of Kd = 6–36 μM for CO2 that have been reported for fixation of carbon dioxide catalyzed
by D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO)[54−56] correspond to a 6–7 kcal/mol CO2 binding energy.
This observed CO2 binding energy will underestimate the
intrinsic CO2 binding energy,[35] by the binding energy utilized to reduce the translational and rotational
entropy of solvated CO2 upon transfer to the active site
of RuBisCO.[57,58] Entropic costs to the reaction
of free CO2 of (3–7) kcal/mol may be estimated from
comparisons of the kinetic parameters for reactions of whole phosphodianion
substrates and [phosphite + truncated substrate] pieces for several
enzymatic reactions.[58−61] This sets 9–14 kcal/mol as the range of stabilization for
the decarboxylation transition state from interactions between OMPDC
and the nascent CO2.
Figure 6
Diagram which illustrates the hypothetical interactions
between ScOMPDC and late vinyl carbanion-like transition
states
for decarboxylation of OMP and deprotonation of FUMP. These diagrams were constructed using X-ray crystallographic
data for the complex to the 6-hydroxyuridine 5′-monophosphate
(BMP) transition state analog (PDB entry 1DQX), and assuming similar
contacts for the stable ligand and hypothetical transition states.
Not shown is stabilization of nascent CO2 by interactions
with hydrophobic amino acid side chains (see below).
The barrier to krot for C–N
bond rotation at −CH2–NL3+ of the K93 side chain, which exchanges the positions
of ammonium cation hydrons, is added to the barrier for the deuterium
exchange but not the decarboxylation reaction (Figure ).[62,63] This is demonstrated
by the observation that the deuterium enrichment of the products of
OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP or FOMP in 50/50 H2O/D2O is equal to the 50% enrichment
of solvent;[62,63] this gives a product deuterium
isotope effect (PDIE) of 1.0.[62,63] The expected selectivity
for the reaction of -H compared with -D from a primary DIE is not
observed, because bond rotation by krot, which would allow for this selection is so slow relative to protonation
of the intermediate (kp ≫ krot, Figure ) that the H/D product enrichment is equal to the initial
H/D enrichment of the -C-NL3+ side chain. Note
that kp from Figure is the rate constant for the microscopic
reverse of substrate deprotonation (kdp) and that the fractionation factor for hydron exchange between LOH
and -C-NL3+ is 1.0.[62,64,65] We therefore concluded that the rate constant
for deuterium exchange (kex) is smaller
than for substrate deprotonation (kdp)
because the vinyl carbanion reaction intermediate undergoes fast protonation
to generate -UMP, and
only rarely undergoes bond rotation (kp ≫ krot) that leads to deuterium
exchange.[6,62,63] By, comparison,
this rotational barrier does not contribute to the barrier to OMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of OMP or FOMP, because
the reaction intermediate is directly protonated by the cationic K93
side chain (Figure ).
Figure 7
Stepwise OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP (X=
H, bottom reaction) and the exchange reaction of -H from FUMP for -D from solvent D2O (X = F, top reaction). The inequality kp ≫ krot for
partitioning of the vinyl carbanion intermediate between proton transfer
and bond rotation at the K93 side chain ensures that the deuterium
enrichment of product of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP is equal to the initial 50% enrichment of the mixed H2O/D2O solvent,[62,63] and that the
barrier to the deprotonation of FUMP (ΔGdp‡) is smaller than the overall barrier for the deuterium exchange
reaction.
Diagram which illustrates the hypothetical interactions
between ScOMPDC and late vinyl carbanion-like transition
states
for decarboxylation of OMP and deprotonation of FUMP. These diagrams were constructed using X-ray crystallographic
data for the complex to the 6-hydroxyuridine 5′-monophosphate
(BMP) transition state analog (PDB entry 1DQX), and assuming similar
contacts for the stable ligand and hypothetical transition states.
Not shown is stabilization of nascent CO2 by interactions
with hydrophobic amino acid side chains (see below).Stepwise OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP (X=
H, bottom reaction) and the exchange reaction of -H from FUMP for -D from solvent D2O (X = F, top reaction). The inequality kp ≫ krot for
partitioning of the vinyl carbanion intermediate between proton transfer
and bond rotation at the K93 side chain ensures that the deuterium
enrichment of product of OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP is equal to the initial 50% enrichment of the mixed H2O/D2O solvent,[62,63] and that the
barrier to the deprotonation of FUMP (ΔGdp‡) is smaller than the overall barrier for the deuterium exchange
reaction.Only a small barrier (kp ≈ 1011 s–1) is expected for strongly thermodynamically
favorable protonation of the vinyl carbanion intermediate of OMPDC-catalyzed
reactions.[66−68] The positioning of the side chains for Asp-91, Lys-93,
and Asp-96 revealed by the X-ray crystal structure of ScOMPDC complexed with BMP (Figure ) provides strong evidence that the −CH2–NL3+group of Lys-93 is immobilized
by hydrogen bonds to the carboxylate groups of Asp-91 and Asp-96 (Figure ),[18] so that krot ≪ 1011 s–1 for unhindered bond rotation and ΔΔGex‡ = ΔΔGdp‡ – ΔGrot‡, where
ΔΔGex‡ and ΔΔGdp‡ are
the enzymatic stabilization of the transition states for the OMPDC-catalyzed
deprotonation and deuterium exchange reactions of FUMP, relative to a common barrier for nonenzymatic deprotonation of FUMP in water.We estimate, crudely, that the requirement
for cleavage of hydrogen
bonds to allow side-chain rotation results in an increase in the barrier
to deuterium exchange of ca. 4 kcal/mol/H-bond. If so, then the barrier
to deprotonation of FUMP will be ΔGrot‡ = (2)(4) = 8 kcal/mol lower than the barrier to the
deuterium exchange reaction, and the overall stabilization of the
transition stated for substrate deprotonation will be (ΔΔG‡)dp = [(ΔΔG‡)ex + 2(4)] = 20 kcal/mol,
where (ΔΔG‡)ex = 12 kcal/mol is the transition state stabilization calculated above
for deuterium exchange into FUMP. This gives (ΔΔG‡)dc – (ΔΔG‡)dp = 31–20 = 11 kcal/mol
as the corrected difference in the stabilization of the transition
states for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and
deprotonation of FUMP.The corrected 11 kcal/mol
difference in transition state stabilization
is in the range of (9–14 kcal/mol) suggested above for stabilization
of a late CO2-like decarboxylation transition state by
interactions with CO2. This analysis provides support for
the conclusion that the transition states for ScOMPDC-catalyzed
decarboxylation of OMP/FOMP and for deprotonation of UMP/FUMP show similar stabilizing interactions with the protein
catalyst over the shared portions of these substrates (Figure ), and differ largely or entirely
because OMPDC shows robust binding interactions with nascent CO2 at the decarboxylation transition state.
Effect of Protein
Substitutions on Kinetic Parameters for ScOMPDC-Catalyzed
Decarboxylation and Deuterium Exchange
Reactions
The value of Km for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP is
80-fold smaller than for Kd for the deuterium
exchange reaction of FUMP (Table ), but Km is
only (4–50)-fold smaller than Kd for variant ScOMPDC-catalyzed reactions (Table ). We conclude that
these protein substitutions act to destabilize the Michaelis complex
to OMP compared to FUMP, instead of the
relative stabilization of the Michaelis complex to OMP predicted for amino acid substitutions that relieve destabilizing
interactions between the protein and the carboxylate of substrate OMP.[35]
Table 3
Effect
of Q215A, Y217F, and R235A
Substitutions on the Activation Barriers for ScOMPDC-Catalyzed
Decarboxylation of OMP at pH 7.1 and for Exchange of
the C-6 Hydrogen of FUMP for Deuterium in D2O at pD 8.1
enzyme
ΔΔGOMP‡ kcal/molb
ΔΔGFUMP‡ kcal/molb
[ΔΔGFUMP‡ – ΔΔGOMP‡] kcal/mol
Q215A
2.2
3.5
1.3
Y217F
2.4
4.1
1.7
Q215A/Y217F
4.8
6.8
2.0
R235Aa
5.6
7.2
1.6
Data from ref (12).
The effect of the amino
acid substitution(s)
on the activation barrier ΔG‡ for kcat/Km for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, or on kex/Kd for ScOMPDC-catalyzed exchange of the
C-6 H of FOMP for deuterium, calculated from data in Table .
Data from ref (12).The effect of the amino
acid substitution(s)
on the activation barrier ΔG‡ for kcat/Km for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP, or on kex/Kd for ScOMPDC-catalyzed exchange of the
C-6 H of FOMP for deuterium, calculated from data in Table .These results are consistent with
a model developed in earlier
work where[12] (i) The value for the observed
Michaelis constant Km or Kd is equal to (Km)o[1/(1 + Kc)] where (Km)o is the disassociation constant for breakdown
of the Michaelis complex to the inactive open form of ScOMPDC and Kc is the equilibrium constant
for conversion of the inactive open complex to the reactive closed
complex. (ii) The loop-closed form of ScOMPDC is
stabilized by interactions with the carboxylate group of OMP, so that (Kc ≫ 1.0) for decarboxylation
of OMP and (Kc ≤ 1.0)
for the deuterium exchange reaction of FUMP. (iii) The
effect of amino acid substitutions that perturb the value of Kc are expressed mainly as a change in Km for the decarboxylation reaction, where Kc ≫ 1.0, and mainly as a change in kex where Kc ≤
1.0.[11,12]Table shows the
effects of substitutions of Q215, Y217, or R235 on the activation
barriers for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation [ΔΔGOMP‡] and D-exchange [ΔΔGFUMP‡] reactions, and the
difference in these changes in activation barrier [ΔΔGFUMP‡ – ΔΔGOMP‡]. We conclude that the Q215,
Y217, and R235 side chains provide a 1.3–1.7 kcal/mol greater
stabilization of the transition state for the D-exchange compared
to decarboxylation reaction (Table ), even though the total stabilization of the former
transition state from all interactions is ca. 11 kcal/mol [(19–8)
kcal/mol, above] smaller than the decarboxylation transition state.
This trend, which is illustrated in Figure , is consistent with the conclusion above
that the transition states for decarboxylation and D-exchange reactions
show similar stabilizing interactions with the dianion gripper side
chains of ScOMPDC over the shared portions of these
reactants.
Figure 8
Hypothetical free-energy profiles for wild type and protein variants
of ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and deprotonation of UMP to form UMP vinyl
carbanion intermediates UMP, which are drawn to show the difference in the stabilization
of the respective transition states by interactions with the protein
catalyst. These profiles were constructed using kinetic data from Table , and assuming that
the changes in protein structure effect similar changes in the barriers
for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP and UMP.[6] The diagrams show:
(1) The ca. 11 kcal/mol difference in the stabilization of the transition
states for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP (ΔΔG‡)dc and deprotonation of UMP (ΔΔG‡)dp [(ΔΔG‡)dc – (ΔΔG‡)dp = 11 kcal/mol, Figure ], that we propose
is due to stabilization of the former transition state by interactions
with the nascent CO2 product. (2) The difference between
the effects of Q215A or Y217F substitutions on ΔΔGUMP‡ (relatively large) and ΔΔGOMP‡ [smaller, Table ]. (3) The larger
effect of amino acid substitutions on the stability of the Michaelis
complexes to OMP (ΔΔGOMPB) compared with UMP/FUMP (ΔΔGFUMPB). The ca 8
kcal/mol barrier to krot, which is required
for the deuterium exchange reaction of UMP (kex) but not for decarboxylation of OMP (kdc) or deprotonation of UMP (kdp), is not shown. The barriers to the two enzymatic
reactions have not been scaled to show the thermodynamic driving force
to decarboxylation of OMP to form UMP, because
this driving force is not known.
Hypothetical free-energy profiles for wild type and protein variants
of ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of OMP and deprotonation of UMP to form UMP vinyl
carbanion intermediates UMP, which are drawn to show the difference in the stabilization
of the respective transition states by interactions with the protein
catalyst. These profiles were constructed using kinetic data from Table , and assuming that
the changes in protein structure effect similar changes in the barriers
for ScOMPDC-catalyzed deprotonation of FUMP and UMP.[6] The diagrams show:
(1) The ca. 11 kcal/mol difference in the stabilization of the transition
states for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP (ΔΔG‡)dc and deprotonation of UMP (ΔΔG‡)dp [(ΔΔG‡)dc – (ΔΔG‡)dp = 11 kcal/mol, Figure ], that we propose
is due to stabilization of the former transition state by interactions
with the nascent CO2 product. (2) The difference between
the effects of Q215A or Y217F substitutions on ΔΔGUMP‡ (relatively large) and ΔΔGOMP‡ [smaller, Table ]. (3) The larger
effect of amino acid substitutions on the stability of the Michaelis
complexes to OMP (ΔΔGOMPB) compared with UMP/FUMP (ΔΔGFUMPB). The ca 8
kcal/mol barrier to krot, which is required
for the deuterium exchange reaction of UMP (kex) but not for decarboxylation of OMP (kdc) or deprotonation of UMP (kdp), is not shown. The barriers to the two enzymatic
reactions have not been scaled to show the thermodynamic driving force
to decarboxylation of OMP to form UMP, because
this driving force is not known.We suggest the following explanation for the larger effects of
amino acid substitutions on ΔΔGFUMP‡ compared
with ΔΔGOMP‡ (Table ). The single Q215A, Y217F and R235A substitutions
at wildtype OMPDC result mainly in the loss of stabilizing interactions
with the excised side chain, and in minimal changes in the interactions
of peripheral side chains at the structured decarboxylation transition
state,[9,11] so that ΔGOMP‡ provides
an estimate for the excised interactions. (ii) Elimination of tightly
bound CO2–/CO2 from this transition
state loosens interactions of the remaining side chains at the transition
state for the D-exchange reaction of FUMP. Single amino
acid substitutions of ScOMPDC further erode these
interactions, and this results in elevated values for ΔΔGFUMP‡ compared with ΔΔGOMP‡. In other words, the
value of ΔΔGFUMP‡ for the single variants reflects
both the loss of the stabilizing interactions of the excised side
chain, plus a weakening of transition state stabilization by the remaining
side chains.[12]
Interactions between OMPDC
and −CO2–/CO2
The CO2 binding pocket at OMPDC
was identified by analysis of the X-ray crystal structure of humanOMPDC (HsOMPDC) liganded by UMP.[27] This structure of HsOMPDC shows
good superposition (Figure ), of active site side chains, with the structure of ScOMPDCcomplexed to 6-aza uridine 5′-monophosphate
(6-azaUMP) and small differences in the orientation of
the pyrimidine rings.[69] The hydrophobic
CO2 binding pocket lies on the opposite side of the pyrimidine
ring from the essential K314 (K93 at ScOMPDC) and
is lined by the hydrophobic side chains of F310, I401, and I448 (F89,
I183, and I232 at ScOMPDC).[6,27] The
carboxylate side chain of D312/D91 is close to the position of a hypothetical OMP carboxylate, so that the interactions of these carboxylates
might destabilize the Michaelis complex to substrate. However, there
is an overall 3 kcal/mol stabilization of the Michaelis complex to OMPcompared to UMP(28) and, as discussed above, an even larger ca. 11 kcal/mol stabilization
of the transition state for decarboxylation of OMP (kdc) compared with deprotonation of UMP (kdp) to form enzyme-bound UMP vinyl carbanions (Figure ).
Figure 9
Representation, on the left, of the X-ray crystal structure for HsOMPDC liganded by UMP (PDB entry 2QCD) and, on the right,
for ScOMPDC liganded by 6-azaUMP (PDB
entry 3GDL).
There is good superposition between the active site residues D312,
K314, and D317 at HsOMPDC with D91, K93, and D96
at ScOMPDC, and of the hydrophobic side chains F310,
I401, and I448 at the CO2 binding pocket with F89, I183
and I232.
Representation, on the left, of the X-ray crystal structure for HsOMPDC liganded by UMP (PDB entry 2QCD) and, on the right,
for ScOMPDC liganded by 6-azaUMP (PDB
entry 3GDL).
There is good superposition between the active site residues D312,
K314, and D317 at HsOMPDC with D91, K93, and D96
at ScOMPDC, and of the hydrophobic side chains F310,
I401, and I448 at the CO2 binding pocket with F89, I183
and I232.The transfer of carboxylate substrates
from an aqueous to a nonpolar
solvent results in large increases in the rate constants for nonenzymatic
decarboxylation.[33,34,36,37] These rate accelerations have been attributed
to ground-state effects, where desolvation of the carboxylate group
that accompanies this transfer results in an increase in the substrate
reactivity toward decarboxylation.[35] The
transfer from an aqueous to an organic solvent is mimicked by the
binding of decarboxylation substrates, including OMP,
to hydrophobic binding pockets at enzymes which catalyze decarboxylation
reactions.[38,42−46,70,71] In one case the polarity of the active site of a thiamine pyrophosphate
dependent yeastpyruvate decarboxylase was estimated from the medium-dependent
fluorescence wavelength maximum of bound thiochrome diphosphate to
be similar to solvents with dielectric constants of 13–15.[72]We propose an alternative model, where
the dominant effect of the
change in medium polarity on the activation barrier for enzymatic
and nonenzymatic decarboxylation reactions is stabilization of the
late CO2-like decarboxylation transition state by interactions
with the hydrophobic solvent for nonenzymatic decarboxylation, or
with the hydrophobic enzyme binding cavity. In the case of OMPDC,
any increase in Km for decarboxylation
of OMP and FOMP from the requirement for
desolvation of −CO2– during substrate
binding is smaller that the increase in kcat from transition state stabilization by interactions with the nascent
CO2 at the hydrophobic CO2 binding pocket (Figure ). We estimate that
the net effect of these interactions at the hydrophobic binding pocket
is a 108-fold increase in the kinetic parameter kcat/Km from the
11 kcal/mol stabilizing interactions between OMPDC and the nascent
CO2.The binding of OMP to inactive
protein variants of
OMPDC results in distortion of the bond to substituents at C-6 from
planarity with respect to the pyrimidine ring.[25−27,73,74] For example, the D312N
variant of HsOMPDC shows a 36° distortion of
the bond to the substrate carboxylate. Similar out of plane distortions
have been reported for the −CN group of 6-cyanouridine 5′-monophosphate
bound to ScOMPDC and for C-6 substituents at other
pyrimidine nucleotides bound to HsOMPDC.[25,73,74] However, there is no apparent
destabilization of this Michaelis complex by substituents at C-6.[28] We suggest that relatively little bond angle
strain energy is associated with these distortions. The distortions
appear to track the early stages of a decarboxylation reaction coordinate,
where the acidic K93 side chain approaches one face of the pyrimidine
ring as CO2 is lost from the opposite face. However, the
product deuterium isotope effect of 1.0 for OMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation
of OMP and FOMP in 50/50 H2O/D2O shows that the hydron provides no electrophilic push to
the loss of CO2 that is characteristic of a fully coupled-concerted
electrophilic displacement reaction.[62,63]
Evolution of
Hydrophobic Binding Pockets at Decarboxylases
Hydrophobic
binding pockets at decarboxylases mimic hydrophobilic
solvents that strongly accelerate nonenzymatic decarboxylation relative
to water.[33,34,37] The observation
of these binding pockets prompted the proposal that enzymatic rate
accelerations for decarboxylation are promoted by destabilization
of the enzyme-bound carboxylate, which moves the energy of the reaction
ground state closer to the decarboxylation transition state.[35] This proposal has been criticized[40,41] and has not received a large amount of direct experimental support.It is important to emphasize that there is no pressure early in
enzyme evolution to select for catalysts that introduce destabilizing
interactions into decarboxylation substrates, which are relieved at
the decarboxylation transition state, since such ground state interactions
have no effect on the kinetic parameter kcat/Km for the overall efficiency of the
catalyst.[35] Pressure for enzymatic specificity
in transition state binding will only be observed as enzymatic catalysis
becomes so efficient that the expression of the large transition state
binding energy in substrate or product binding results in rate determining
ligand binding steps.[17,20,75] We propose that the evolutionary pressure results in the selection
of nonpolar binding pockets that provide optimal stabilization of
late CO2-like decarboxylation transition states. Once this
transition state stabilization from CO2 binding interactions
has been optimized, it becomes impossible to select for destabilizing
interactions between the protein and the substrate carboxylate that
do not result in a decrease in kcat/Km by perturbing the preoptimized hydrophobic
interactions. In the case of OMPDC, rate-determining substrate binding
or product release is avoided through utilization of a substantial
fraction of the 31 kcal/mol intrinsic substrate binding energy to
drive a thermodynamically favorable enzyme conformational change from
the flexible open form, to the stiff Michaelis complex.[17,76,77]
Authors: Michal Biler; Rory M Crean; Anna K Schweiger; Robert Kourist; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 15.419