| Literature DB >> 31344796 |
Paloma Massó1,2, Antonio Callejas1,3, Juan Melchor4,5,6, Francisca S Molina1,2, Guillermo Rus1,3,7.
Abstract
A torsional wave (TW) sensor prototype was employed to quantify stiffness of the cervix in pregnant women. A cross-sectional study in a total of 18 women between 16 weeks and 35 weeks + 5 days of gestation was performed. The potential of TW technique to assess cervical ripening was evaluated by the measurement of stiffness related to gestational age and cervical length. Statistically significant correlations were found between cervical stiffness and gestational age ( R 2 = 0.370 , p = 0.0074 , using 1 kHz waves and R 2 = 0.445 , p = 0.0250 , using 1.5 kHz waves). A uniform decrease in stiffness of the cervical tissue was confirmed to happen during the complete gestation. There was no significant correlation between stiffness and cervical length. A stronger association between gestational age and cervical stiffness was found compared to gestational age and cervical length correlation. As a conclusion, TW technique is a feasible approach to objectively quantify the decrease of cervical stiffness related to gestational age. Further research is required to evaluate the application of TW technique in obstetric evaluations, such as prediction of preterm delivery and labor induction failure.Entities:
Keywords: cervical stiffness; cervix; pregnancy; torsional wave
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31344796 PMCID: PMC6696138 DOI: 10.3390/s19153249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram for the exploration with TW technique.
Figure 2The prototyped TW probe.
Figure 3Example of three emitted and received 1 kHz signals.
Figure 4Normal quantile–quantile plots for the three velocity calculation procedures.
Features of the population in the study.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Total population (N) | 18 |
| Gestational age at test (weeks) | 26.4 (16 weeks to 35 weeks + 5 days) |
| Nulliparous (N) | 2 (11 %) |
| Cervical length (mm) | 33 (10–49) |
Figure 5Relationship between cervical stiffness assessed by shear wave speed using 1 kHz waves and gestational age at time of examination.
Figure 6Relationship between cervical stiffness assessed by shear wave speed using 1.5 kHz waves and gestational age at time of examination.
Figure 7Relationship between cervical stiffness assessed by shear wave speed using 0.5 kHz waves and gestational age at time of examination.
Figure 8Relationship between cervical length and gestational age at time of examination.
Figure 9Relationship between cervical stiffness and cervical length.