OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound-derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. METHODS: Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid-sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross-sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within-subject correlation. Inter-rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. RESULTS: A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8-40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross-sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross-sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of > 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound-derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied. METHODS: Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid-sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross-sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within-subject correlation. Inter-rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients. RESULTS: A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8-40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross-sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross-sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of > 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age. CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.
Authors: J Foucher; E Chanteloup; J Vergniol; L Castéra; B Le Bail; X Adhoute; J Bertet; P Couzigou; V de Lédinghen Journal: Gut Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: R B Newman; R L Goldenberg; J D Iams; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A H Moawad; E Thom; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; M Dombrowski Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Lindsey C Carlson; Helen Feltovich; Mark L Palmeri; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Timothy J Hall Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: K Köbbing; A Fruscalzo; K Hammer; M Möllers; M Falkenberg; R Kwiecien; W Klockenbusch; R Schmitz Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 2.521