Literature DB >> 24661250

Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies: where are we and where are we going? A review of literature.

N Sananès1, B Langer, A Gaudineau, R Kutnahorsky, G Aissi, G Fritz, E Boudier, B Viville, I Nisand, R Favre.   

Abstract

Prematurity is the chief cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to review the different methods for predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic pregnant women and in situations of threatened preterm delivery. A search of the PubMed/Medline database was carried out for the years 1980-2012. We included studies for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Models for predicting preterm delivery based on maternal factors, cervical length and obstetric history in first trimester of pregnancy is a valuable avenue of research. Nevertheless, prediction accuracy still needs to be improved. In the second and third trimesters, routine digital vaginal examination is of no value in asymptomatic women. Echography of the cervix is not useful except in patients with a history of late miscarriage or preterm delivery in order to offer them a preventive treatment. In symptomatic women, the combination of digital vaginal examination, cervical echography and fibronectin gives the best predictive results. Electromyography of the uterus and elastography of the cervix are interesting avenues for future research. Identifying patients at risk of preterm delivery should be considered differently at each stage of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General obstetrics; prediction; preterm delivery; score; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661250     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.896325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  10 in total

1.  A Parameterized Ultrasound-Based Finite Element Analysis of the Mechanical Environment of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Andrea R Westervelt; Michael Fernandez; Michael House; Joy Vink; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Ronald Wapner; Kristin M Myers
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at ≤34 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Maynor Garcia; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Homam Saker; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  Evaluation of proteomic biomarkers associated with circulating microparticles as an effective means to stratify the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  David E Cantonwine; Zhen Zhang; Kevin Rosenblatt; Kevin S Goudy; Robert C Doss; Alan M Ezrin; Gail Page; Brian Brohman; Thomas F McElrath
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy and preterm delivery: A prospective cohort study in China.

Authors:  Fanfan Chan; Songying Shen; Peiyuan Huang; Jianrong He; Xueling Wei; Jinhua Lu; Lifang Zhang; Xiaoyan Xia; Huimin Xia; Kar Keung Cheng; Shakila Thangaratinam; Ben Willem Mol; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Pregnant human peripheral leukocyte migration during several late pregnancy clinical conditions: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Jun Takeda; Xin Fang; David M Olson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb.

Authors:  Emily A Partridge; Marcus G Davey; Matthew A Hornick; Patrick E McGovern; Ali Y Mejaddam; Jesse D Vrecenak; Carmen Mesas-Burgos; Aliza Olive; Robert C Caskey; Theodore R Weiland; Jiancheng Han; Alexander J Schupper; James T Connelly; Kevin C Dysart; Jack Rychik; Holly L Hedrick; William H Peranteau; Alan W Flake
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Applying Precision Public Health to Prevent Preterm Birth.

Authors:  John P Newnham; Matthew W Kemp; Scott W White; Catherine A Arrese; Roger J Hart; Jeffrey A Keelan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-04-04

8.  Predictions of Preterm Birth from Early Pregnancy Characteristics: Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jian-Rong He; Rema Ramakrishnan; Yu-Mian Lai; Wei-Dong Li; Xuan Zhao; Yan Hu; Nian-Nian Chen; Fang Hu; Jin-Hua Lu; Xue-Ling Wei; Ming-Yang Yuan; Song-Ying Shen; Lan Qiu; Qiao-Zhu Chen; Cui-Yue Hu; Kar Keung Cheng; Ben Willem J Mol; Hui-Min Xia; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Developing and validating a risk prediction model for preterm birth at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Sefineh Fenta Feleke; Zelalem Alamrew Anteneh; Gizachew Tadesse Wassie; Anteneh Kassa Yalew; Anteneh Mengist Dessie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Predictive Factors for Delivery within 7 Days after Successful 48-Hour Treatment of Threatened Preterm Labor.

Authors:  Carolien Roos; Ewoud Schuit; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Antoinette C Bolte; Hans J J Duvekot; Jim van Eyck; Joke H Kok; Anneke Kwee; Ashley E R Merién; Brent C Opmeer; Martijn A Oudijk; Mariëlle G van Pampus; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Martina M Porath; Krystyna M Sollie; Marc E A Spaanderman; Sylvia M C Vijgen; Christine Willekes; Fred K Lotgering; Joris A M van der Post; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-06-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.