Literature DB >> 22173854

Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.

F S Molina1, L F Gómez, J Florido, M C Padilla, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess a new method for numerical quantification of cervical elastography during pregnancy and to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements.
METHODS: Cervical elastography was carried out twice by a single operator in 112 singleton pregnancies at a median of 21 (range, 12-40) weeks' gestation. In 50 of the cases a second operator performed another elastography measurement. The intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of measurements in different parts of the cervix were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% CI and by Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the elastography measurements made by the same and by two different observers in each area measured, except in the area that receives the force of the transducer directly. The distribution of elastographic measurements obtained in different regions of the cervix demonstrated that the external and superior parts were significantly softer than the internal and inferior parts.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to provide an objective quantification of elastographic colors in the cervix. The measurements obtained by elastography may be a mere reflection of the force being applied by the transducer to different parts of the cervix. It is too premature to suggest that the measurements of rate-of-change in tissue displacement reflect histological changes that could provide a measure of cervical ripening.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22173854     DOI: 10.1002/uog.11067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  35 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of shear wave speed in the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Lindsey C Carlson; Helen Feltovich; Mark L Palmeri; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Effect of depth on shear-wave elastography estimated in the internal and external cervical os during pregnancy.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Alma Aurioles-Garibay; Maynor Garcia; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse G Schwartz; Hyunyoung Ahn; Alicia Martinez-Varea; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 3.  The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin M Myers; Helen Feltovich; Edoardo Mazza; Joy Vink; Michael Bajka; Ronald J Wapner; Timothy J Hall; Michael House
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery.

Authors:  K Köbbing; A Fruscalzo; K Hammer; M Möllers; M Falkenberg; R Kwiecien; W Klockenbusch; R Schmitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Edoardo Mazza; Helen Feltovich; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Cervical Sonoelastography and Cervical Length Measurement but not Cervicovaginal Interleukin-6 Are Predictors for Preterm Birth.

Authors:  A Weichert; D von Schöning; T Fischer; A Thomas
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-08-24

8.  Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at ≤34 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Maynor Garcia; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Homam Saker; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.901

9.  Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Ambrogio P Londero; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.314

10.  Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  E Hernandez-Andrade; S S Hassan; H Ahn; S J Korzeniewski; L Yeo; T Chaiworapongsa; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.