OBJECTIVES: To apply 3D multifrequency MR elastography (3DMMRE) to the uterus and analyse the viscoelasticity of the uterine tissue in healthy volunteers considering individual variations and variations over the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study, one of whom was examined 12 times over two menstrual cycles. Pelvic 3DMMRE was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with seven vibration frequencies (30-60 Hz) using a piezoelectric driver. Two mechanical parameter maps were obtained corresponding to the magnitude (|G (*) |) and the phase angle (φ) of the complex shear modulus. RESULTS: On average, the uterine corpus had higher elasticity, but similar viscosity compared with the cervix, reflected by |G (*) |uterine corpus = 2.58 ± 0.52 kPa vs. |G (*) |cervix = 2.00 ± 0.34 kPa (p < 0.0001) and φ uterine corpus = 0.54 ± 0.08, φ cervix = 0.57 ± 0.12 (p = 0.428). With 2.23 ± 0.26 kPa, |G (*) | of the myometrium was lower in the secretory phase (SP) compared with that of the proliferative phase (PP, |G (*) | = 3.01 ± 0.26 kPa). For the endometrium, the value of |G (*) | in SP was 68% lower than during PP (PP, |G (*) | = 3.34 ± 0.42 kPa; SP, |G (*) | = 1.97 ± 0.34 kPa; p = 0.0061). CONCLUSION: 3DMMRE produces high-resolution mechanical parameter maps of the uterus and cervix and shows sensitivity to structural and functional changes of the endometrium and myometrium during the menstrual cycle. KEY POINTS: MR elastography provided for the first time spatially resolved viscoelasticity maps of uterus. Uterine corpus had a higher elasticity, but similar viscosity compared with cervix. The stiffness of both endometrium and myometrium decreases during the menstrual cycle.
OBJECTIVES: To apply 3D multifrequency MR elastography (3DMMRE) to the uterus and analyse the viscoelasticity of the uterine tissue in healthy volunteers considering individual variations and variations over the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study, one of whom was examined 12 times over two menstrual cycles. Pelvic 3DMMRE was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with seven vibration frequencies (30-60 Hz) using a piezoelectric driver. Two mechanical parameter maps were obtained corresponding to the magnitude (|G (*) |) and the phase angle (φ) of the complex shear modulus. RESULTS: On average, the uterine corpus had higher elasticity, but similar viscosity compared with the cervix, reflected by |G (*) |uterine corpus = 2.58 ± 0.52 kPa vs. |G (*) |cervix = 2.00 ± 0.34 kPa (p < 0.0001) and φ uterine corpus = 0.54 ± 0.08, φ cervix = 0.57 ± 0.12 (p = 0.428). With 2.23 ± 0.26 kPa, |G (*) | of the myometrium was lower in the secretory phase (SP) compared with that of the proliferative phase (PP, |G (*) | = 3.01 ± 0.26 kPa). For the endometrium, the value of |G (*) | in SP was 68% lower than during PP (PP, |G (*) | = 3.34 ± 0.42 kPa; SP, |G (*) | = 1.97 ± 0.34 kPa; p = 0.0061). CONCLUSION: 3DMMRE produces high-resolution mechanical parameter maps of the uterus and cervix and shows sensitivity to structural and functional changes of the endometrium and myometrium during the menstrual cycle. KEY POINTS: MR elastography provided for the first time spatially resolved viscoelasticity maps of uterus. Uterine corpus had a higher elasticity, but similar viscosity compared with cervix. The stiffness of both endometrium and myometrium decreases during the menstrual cycle.
Authors: Nicholas J Raine-Fenning; Bruce K Campbell; Jeanette S Clewes; Nigel R Kendall; Ian R Johnson Journal: BJOG Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Caroline L Hoad; Nick J Raine-Fenning; Jonathan Fulford; Bruce K Campbell; Ian R Johnson; Penelope A Gowland Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: M D J McGarry; E E W Van Houten; P R Perriñez; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Elizabeth A Stewart; F Andrei Taran; Jun Chen; Bobbie S Gostout; David A Woodrum; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Marzanna Obrzut; Bogdan Obrzut; Marcin Zmuda; Jakub Baran; Marian Cholewa; Richard Ehman; Dorota Darmochwal-Kolarz Journal: Ginekol Pol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Vanessa Nunes; Jennifer Cross; John E Speich; Danielle R Morgan; Jerome F Strauss; Ronald M Ramus Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Antonio Callejas; Antonio Gomez; Juan Melchor; Miguel Riveiro; Paloma Massó; Jorge Torres; Modesto T López-López; Guillermo Rus Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 3.576