Literature DB >> 31330118

Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Aaron C Moberly1, Jessa Reed1.   

Abstract

Purpose Speech recognition relies upon a listener's successful pairing of the acoustic-phonetic details from the bottom-up input with top-down linguistic processing of the incoming speech stream. When the speech is spectrally degraded, such as through a cochlear implant (CI), this role of top-down processing is poorly understood. This study explored the interactions of top-down processing, specifically the use of semantic context during sentence recognition, and the relative contributions of different neurocognitive functions during speech recognition in adult CI users. Method Data from 41 experienced adult CI users were collected and used in analyses. Participants were tested for recognition and immediate repetition of speech materials in the clear. They were asked to repeat 2 sets of sentence materials, 1 that was semantically meaningful and 1 that was syntactically appropriate but semantically anomalous. Participants also were tested on 4 visual measures of neurocognitive functioning to assess working memory capacity (Digit Span; Wechsler, 2004), speed of lexical access (Test of Word Reading Efficiency; Torgeson, Wagner, & Rashotte, 1999), inhibitory control (Stroop; Stroop, 1935), and nonverbal fluid reasoning (Raven's Progressive Matrices; Raven, 2000). Results Individual listeners' inhibitory control predicted recognition of meaningful sentences when controlling for performance on anomalous sentences, our proxy for the quality of the bottom-up input. Additionally, speed of lexical access and nonverbal reasoning predicted recognition of anomalous sentences. Conclusions Findings from this study identified inhibitory control as a potential mechanism at work when listeners make use of semantic context during sentence recognition. Moreover, speed of lexical access and nonverbal reasoning were associated with recognition of sentences that lacked semantic context. These results motivate the development of improved comprehensive rehabilitative approaches for adult patients with CIs to optimize use of top-down processing and underlying core neurocognitive functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31330118      PMCID: PMC6802905          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  40 in total

1.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context.

Authors:  M S Sommers; S M Danielson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1999-09

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Mary Rudner; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  When sentences live up to your expectations.

Authors:  Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Working memory compensates for hearing related phonological processing deficit.

Authors:  Elisabet Classon; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  12 in total

1.  Spoken words activate native and non-native letter-to-sound mappings: Evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; James Bartolotti; Natalia L Daniel; Sayuri Hayakawa
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jessica H Lewis; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray; Terrin N Tamati
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Victoria A Sevich; Shauntelle A Cannon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria.

Authors:  Elizabeth Perkins; Mary S Dietrich; Nauman Manzoor; Matthew O'Malley; Marc Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; David Haynes; Robert Labadie; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Recognizing spoken words in semantically-anomalous sentences: Effects of executive control in early-implanted deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2021-03-05

7.  Explaining Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Complementary Contributions of Demographic, Sensory, and Cognitive Factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Skidmore; Kara J Vasil; Shuman He; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 8.  A surgeon-scientist's perspective and review of cognitive-linguistic contributions to adult cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-06

9.  Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Alexander T Murr; Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Emily Buss; English R King; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Matthew M Dedmon; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.970

10.  Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Petrina La Faire; Xiaodong Tan; Pamela Fiebig; David M Landsberger; Alan G Micco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.