Literature DB >> 33606469

Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria.

Elizabeth Perkins1, Mary S Dietrich, Nauman Manzoor, Matthew O'Malley, Marc Bennett, Alejandro Rivas, David Haynes, Robert Labadie, René Gifford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 1) To complete a follow-up investigation of postoperative outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients scoring ≥30% Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) preoperatively, and 2) to describe the postoperative performance trajectory for this group of higher performing patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred four (105 ears) postlingually deafened adults who scored ≥30% CNC word recognition in the ear to be implanted preoperatively.
INTERVENTIONS: One hundred four subjects underwent cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- and postoperative CNC word scores and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise in the ear to be implanted as well as the bilateral-aided condition pre-CI and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-CI.
RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement was demonstrated for CNC and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise for the CI alone and bilateral listening conditions. Most improvement was demonstrated by 6-months postoperatively (p < 0.001) with the exception of AzBio sentences in noise demonstrating improvement within 3 months (p < 0.001). For patients with preop CNC scores up to 40% (n = 57), all recipients demonstrated either equivocal (n = 17) or statistically significant improvement (n = 40) for CNC word recognition in the CI-alone condition and none demonstrated a significant decrement in the bilateral condition. For patients with preop CNC scores >40% (n = 47, 48 ears), 89.3% (42 patients) demonstrated either equivocal (n = 24, 50%) or statistically significant improvement (n = 19, 39.6%) for CNC word recognition in the CI-only condition and none demonstrated a significant decrement in the bilateral condition.
CONCLUSIONS: CI candidates with preoperative CNC word scores higher than conventional CI recipients derive statistically significant benefit from cochlear implantation for both the CI ear and best-aided condition. These data provide further support for the expansion of adult CI candidacy up to at least 40% CNC word recognition preoperatively with consideration given to further expansion possibly up to 60%.
Copyright © 2020, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606469      PMCID: PMC8627184          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  27 in total

1.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU).

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner; Catharina Foo; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

4.  Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jessa Reed
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Emily Buss; Marcia S Clark; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly.

Authors:  Veronique Chatelin; Eugene J Kim; Colin Driscoll; Jannine Larky; Colleen Polite; Laura Price; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Jon K Shallop; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Nichole C Dwyer; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner; Adriana Zekveld; Patrik Sörqvist; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Orjan Dahlström; Carine Signoret; Stefan Stenfelt; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-13
View more
  7 in total

1.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.

Authors:  Ankita Patro; Nathan R Lindquist; Jourdan T Holder; Kareem O Tawfik; Matthew R O'Malley; Marc L Bennett; David S Haynes; René Gifford; Elizabeth L Perkins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 4.  Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 5.  Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults: Limitations, Expansions, and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Teresa A Zwolan; Gregory Basura
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

6.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Guidelines for cochlear implantation in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Musaed A Alzahrani; Nader F Aldajani; Saeed A Alghamdi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.422

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.