Literature DB >> 34546763

Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Jourdan T Holder1, René H Gifford1.   

Abstract

Purpose Despite the recommendation for cochlear implant (CI) processor use during all waking hours, variability in average daily wear time remains high. Previous work has shown that objective wear time is significantly correlated with speech recognition outcomes. We aimed to investigate the causal link between daily wear time and speech recognition outcomes and assess one potential underlying mechanism, spectral processing, driving the causal link. We hypothesized that increased CI use would result in improved speech recognition via improved spectral processing. Method Twenty adult CI recipients completed two study visits. The baseline visit included auditory perception testing (speech recognition and spectral processing measures), questionnaire administration, and documentation of data logging from the CI software. Participants watched an educational video, and they were informed of the compensation schedule. Participants were then asked to increase their daily CI use over a 4-week period during everyday life. Baseline measures were reassessed following the 4-week period. Results Seventeen out of 20 participants increased their daily CI use. On average, participants' speech recognition improved by 3.0, 2.4, and 7.0 percentage points per hour of increased average daily CI use for consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AzBio sentences, and AzBio sentences in noise, respectively. Questionnaire scores were similar between visits. Spectral processing showed significant improvement and accounted for a small amount of variance in the change in speech recognition values. Conclusions Improved consistency of processor use over a 4-week period yielded significant improvements in speech recognition scores. Though a significant factor, spectral processing is likely not the only mechanism driving improvement in speech recognition; further research is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34546763      PMCID: PMC9132064          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.674


  48 in total

1.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Aniket A Saoji; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates.

Authors:  Janice Leung; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jennifer D Yeagle; Jill Chinnici; Stephen Bowditch; Howard W Francis; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Asymmetric Hearing During Development: The Aural Preference Syndrome and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Karen Gordon; Yael Henkin; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes.

Authors:  Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Conductive Hearing Loss Has Long-Lasting Structural and Molecular Effects on Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Structures of Auditory Nerve Synapses in the Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Cheryl Clarkson; Flora M Antunes; Maria E Rubio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States.

Authors:  Donna L Sorkin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

3.  Longitudinal auditory data of children with prelingual single-sided deafness managed with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Tine Arras; An Boudewyns; Freya Swinnen; Andrzej Zarowski; Birgit Philips; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.