Literature DB >> 17924196

The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition.

Jason B Wolf1, W Edwin Harris, Nick J Royle.   

Abstract

In theory, females of many species choose mates based on traits that are indicators of male genetic quality. A fundamental question in evolutionary biology is why genetic variation for such indicator traits persists despite strong persistent selection imposed by female preference, which is known as the lek paradox. One potential solution to the lek paradox suggests that the traits that are targets of mate choice should evolve condition-dependent expression and that condition should have a large genetic variance. Condition is expected to exhibit high genetic variance because it is affected by a large number of physiological processes and hence, condition-dependent traits should 'capture' variation contributed by a large number of loci. We suggest that a potentially important cause of variation in condition is competition for limited resources. Here, we discuss a pair of models to analyze the evolutionary genetics of traits affected by success in social competition for resources. We show that competition can contribute to genetic variation of 'competition-dependent' traits that have fundamentally different evolutionary properties than other sources of variation. Competition dependence can make traits honest indicators of genetic quality by revealing the relative competitive ability of males, can provide a component of heritable variation that does not contribute to trait evolution, and can help maintain heritable variation under directional selection. Here we provide a general introduction to the concept of competition dependence and briefly introduce two models to demonstrate the potential evolutionary consequences of competition-dependent trait expression.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924196     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9214-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  21 in total

1.  Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives.

Authors:  G E DICKERSON
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

3.  The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait.

Authors:  Reinhard Bürger; Alexander Gimelfarb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Multilevel selection 2: Estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Esther D Ellen; Jason B Wolf; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition.

Authors:  W Edwin Harris; Alan J McKane; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski; Sean Nee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Analysis of competitive interactions in triocultures of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Hemmat; P Eggleston
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genotypic interactions among competing strains and species of Drosophila.

Authors:  D R Weisbrot
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The competition diallel and the exploitation and interference components of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J R De Miranda; M Hemmat; P Eggleston
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Herman L Mays
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Richard James; Jens Krause; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Uriel Gelin; Marie-Claude Perron; Denis Réale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Effect of competitive cues on reproductive morphology and behavioral plasticity in male fruitflies.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Claudia Fricke; James D Westmancoat; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 2.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.