Literature DB >> 16592964

Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations.

L D Mueller1, F J Ayala.   

Abstract

Density-dependent genetic evolution was tested in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster subject for eight generations to natural selection under high (K-selection) or low (r-selection) population density regimes. The test consisted of determining at high and at low densities the per capita rate of population growth of the selected populations. At high densities, the K-selected populations showed a higher per capita rate of population growth than did r-selected populations, but the reverse was true at low densities. These results corroborate the predictions derived from formal models of density-dependent selection. However, no evidence of a trade-off in per capita rate of growth was observed in 25 populations of D. melanogaster, each homozygous for a different second chromosome sampled from a natural population.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16592964      PMCID: PMC319997          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  r and K Selection in Experimental Populations of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L S Luckinbill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Competition between species: theoretical models and experimental tests.

Authors:  F J Ayala; M E Gilpin; J G Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Genetic load in natural populations: is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection?

Authors:  M L Tracey; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  23 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; H S Pereira; K Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots.

Authors:  F A De Leij; J M Whipps; J M Lynch
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Evolution of behavior by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  P Z Guo; L D Mueller; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetics and the origin of species: an introduction.

Authors:  F J Ayala; W M Fitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A demographic approach to selection.

Authors:  W W Anderson; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Trehalase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R S Burton; A La Spada
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.890

9.  Probing the evolution of senescence in Drosophila melanogaster with P-element tagging.

Authors:  A G Clark; R N Guadalupe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.