Literature DB >> 3104906

Evolution of accelerated senescence in laboratory populations of Drosophila.

L D Mueller.   

Abstract

Ecological theories of life history evolution predict that natural selection should favor semelparous life histories in environments where juvenile survival is high relative to adult survival and rates of population growth are high. That is, organisms should complete their entire reproductive effort in a short period of time following maturation. Direct empirical verification of this idea has been lacking. Six independent populations of Drosophila melanogaster were maintained in two different environments, called r and K, for more than 120 generations. In the r environment population size was small, larval survival and rates of population growth were high, and reproduction was limited to a few days after eclosion. In the K environment population size was large and larval survival low, but adults were allowed to reproduce indefinitely. The fecundity of females of different sizes from each environment was measured daily for 4 weeks. No differences in fecundity were seen during the first week of adult life for females from the two environments. By the fourth week, however, the fecundity of large females from the r environment was 47-83% less than that of females from the K environment. The accelerated senescence exhibited by females from the r environment appears to be due to the accumulation of deleterious alleles whose effects are expressed late in life, which is consistent with the mutation accumulation hypothesis for the evolution of senescence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3104906      PMCID: PMC304564          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  The population consequences of life history phenomena.

Authors:  L C COLE
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Evolution of senescence and specific longevity.

Authors:  E B Edney; R W Gill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The aging effect on male mating activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Kosuda
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  A test of evolutionary theories of senescence.

Authors:  M Rose; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females.

Authors:  M R Rose; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  L D Mueller; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Partridge; N Prowse; P Pignatelli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quantitative trait loci affecting life span in replicated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Composite interval mapping.

Authors:  Scott N Forbes; Robert K Valenzuela; Paul Keim; Philip M Service
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  What can genetic variation tell us about the evolution of senescence?

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Expression of genetic and environmental variation during ageing : 2. Selection for increased lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Engström; L E Liljedahl; T Björklund
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Translational Geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions.

Authors:  Mitchell B Lee; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Transl Med Aging       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 6.  New model systems for studying the evolutionary biology of aging: crustacea.

Authors:  D Reznick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 7.  Evolution of aging: testing the theory using Drosophila.

Authors:  L Partridge; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Population density effects on longevity.

Authors:  J L Graves; L D Mueller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Probing the evolution of senescence in Drosophila melanogaster with P-element tagging.

Authors:  A G Clark; R N Guadalupe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.