Literature DB >> 17473360

Spatial resolution of 2D ionization chamber arrays for IMRT dose verification: single-detector size and sampling step width.

Björn Poppe1, Armand Djouguela, Arne Blechschmidt, Kay Willborn, Antje Rühmann, Dietrich Harder.   

Abstract

The spatial resolution of 2D detector arrays equipped with ionization chambers or diodes, used for the dose verification of IMRT treatment plans, is limited by the size of the single detector and the centre-to-centre distance between the detectors. Optimization criteria with regard to these parameters have been developed by combining concepts of dosimetry and pattern analysis. The 2D-ARRAY Type 10024 (PTW-Freiburg, Germany), single-chamber cross section 5 x 5 mm(2), centre-to-centre distance between chambers in each row and column 10 mm, served as an example. Additional frames of given dose distributions can be taken by shifting the whole array parallel or perpendicular to the MLC leaves by, e.g., 5 mm. The size of the single detector is characterized by its lateral response function, a trapezoid with 5 mm top width and 9 mm base width. Therefore, values measured with the 2D array are regarded as sample values from the convolution product of the accelerator generated dose distribution and this lateral response function. Consequently, the dose verification, e.g., by means of the gamma index, is performed by comparing the measured values of the 2D array with the values of the convolution product of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose distribution and the single-detector lateral response function. Sufficiently small misalignments of the measured dose distributions in comparison with the calculated ones can be detected since the lateral response function is symmetric with respect to the centre of the chamber, and the change of dose gradients due to the convolution is sufficiently small. The sampling step width of the 2D array should provide a set of sample values representative of the sampled distribution, which is achieved if the highest spatial frequency contained in this function does not exceed the 'Nyquist frequency', one half of the sampling frequency. Since the convolution products of IMRT-typical dose distributions and the single-detector lateral response function have no or very small frequency contributions beyond 0.1 mm(-1), the mathematical approach introduced by Nyquist and Shannon shows that the sampling frequency of 0.2 mm(-1) is appropriate. Overall it is shown that the spatial resolution of the 2D-ARRAY Type 10024 is appropriate for the dose verification of IMRT plans. The insights obtained are also applied in the discussion of other available two-dimensional detector arrays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473360     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  27 in total

Review 1.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of a fast method of EPID-based dosimetry for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin E Nelms; Karl H Rasmussen; Wolfgang A Tome
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Improvement of I'mRT MatriXX in terms of spatial resolution and large area acquisition for patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy verification.

Authors:  Arun S Oinam; Lakhwant Singh; S C Sharma; Pradeep Goswami
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-07

4.  Implementation and validation of a commercial portal dosimetry software for intensity-modulated radiation therapy pre-treatment verification.

Authors:  C Varatharaj; Eugenia Moretti; M Ravikumar; Maria Rosa Malisan; Sanjay S Supe; Renato Padovani
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

5.  Two years experience with quality assurance protocol for patient related Rapid Arc treatment plan verification using a two dimensional ionization chamber array.

Authors:  Daniela Wagner; Hilke Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the Montpellier Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Pascal Fenoglietto; Benoit Laliberté; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A method to improve fluence resolution derived from two-dimensional detector array measurements for patient-specific IMRT verification using the information collected in dynalog files.

Authors:  Juan Agustin Calama Santiago; Miguel Angel Infante Utrilla; Maria Elisa Lavado Rodriguez
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Precise film dosimetry for stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy quality assurance using Gafchromic™ EBT3 films.

Authors:  Ning Wen; Siming Lu; Jinkoo Kim; Yujiao Qin; Yimei Huang; Bo Zhao; Chang Liu; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA.

Authors:  Varatharaj Chandraraj; Sotirios Stathakis; Ravikumar Manickam; Carlos Esquivel; Sanjay S Supe; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Kiley B Pulliam; Elizabeth M McKenzie; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.