Literature DB >> 31281871

The Design and In Vivo Testing of a Locally Stiffness-Matched Porous Scaffold.

Shaaz Ghouse1, Natalie Reznikov2, Oliver R Boughton3, Sarat Babu4, K C Geoffrey Ng1, Gordon Blunn5, Justin P Cobb3, Molly M Stevens2, Jonathan R T Jeffers1.   

Abstract

An increasing volume of work supports utilising the mechanobiology of bone for bone ingrowth into a porous scaffold. However, typically during in vivo testing of implants, the mechanical properties of the bone being replaced are not quantified. Consequently there remains inconsistencies in the literature regarding 'optimum' pore size and porosity for bone ingrowth. It is also difficult to compare ingrowth results between studies and to translate in vivo animal testing to human subjects without understanding the mechanical environment. This study presents a clinically applicable approach to determining local bone mechanical properties and design of a scaffold with similar properties. The performance of the scaffold was investigated in vivo in an ovine model. The density, modulus and strength of trabecular bone from the medial femoral condyle from ovine bones was characterised and power-law relationships were established. A porous titanium scaffold, intended to maintain bone mechanical homeostasis, was additively manufactured and implanted into the medial femoral condyle of 6 ewes. The stiffness of the scaffold varied throughout the heterogeneous structure and matched the stiffness variation of bone at the surgical site. Bone ingrowth into the scaffold was 10.73±2.97% after 6 weeks. Fine woven bone, in the interior of the scaffold, and intense formations of more developed woven bone overlaid with lamellar bone at the implant periphery were observed. The workflow presented will allow future in vivo testing to test specific bone strains on bone ingrowth in response to a scaffold and allow for better translation from in vivo testing to commercial implants.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31281871      PMCID: PMC6609455          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Mater Today        ISSN: 2352-9407


  27 in total

1.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; G J Stackpool; S A Hacking; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

2.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Harun H Bayraktar; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Size and habit of mineral particles in bone and mineralized callus during bone healing in sheep.

Authors:  Yifei Liu; Inderchand Manjubala; Hanna Schell; Devakara R Epari; Paul Roschger; Georg N Duda; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Poorly ordered bone as an endogenous scaffold for the deposition of highly oriented lamellar tissue in rapidly growing ovine bone.

Authors:  Michael Kerschnitzki; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Yifei Liu; Paul Roschger; Georg N Duda; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.481

5.  Comparison of mechanical and ultrasound elastic modulus of ovine tibial cortical bone.

Authors:  Caroline A Grant; Lance J Wilson; Christian Langton; Devakar Epari
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Prediction of structural failure of tibial bone models under physiological loads: effect of CT density-modulus relationships.

Authors:  Mahmut Tuncer; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits.

Authors:  A I Itälä; H O Ylänen; C Ekholm; K H Karlsson; H T Aro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001

Review 8.  Bone remodeling.

Authors:  Dimitrios J Hadjidakis; Ioannis I Androulakis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Adaptive and Injury Response of Bone to Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bonekey Osteovision       Date:  2012-10-10

Review 10.  The amazing osteocyte.

Authors:  Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

2.  Approach to the Fatigue and Cellular Behavior of Superficially Modified Porous Titanium Dental Implants.

Authors:  Paloma Trueba; Carlos Navarro; Mercè Giner; José A Rodríguez-Ortiz; María José Montoya-García; Ernesto J Delgado-Pujol; Luisa M Rodríguez-Albelo; Yadir Torres
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Topology Optimisation for Compliant Hip Implant Design and Reduced Strain Shielding.

Authors:  Nathanael Tan; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Data related to architectural bone parameters and the relationship to Ti lattice design for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Martine McGregor; Sagar Patel; Stewart McLachlin; Mihaela Vlasea
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 5.  Innovative Concepts and Recent Breakthrough for Engineered Graft and Constructs for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Inchingolo; Denisa Hazballa; Alessio Danilo Inchingolo; Giuseppina Malcangi; Grazia Marinelli; Antonio Mancini; Maria Elena Maggiore; Ioana Roxana Bordea; Antonio Scarano; Marco Farronato; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Felice Lorusso; Angelo Michele Inchingolo; Gianna Dipalma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Total and partial knee arthroplasty implants that maintain native load transfer in the tibia.

Authors:  Maxwell J Munford; Jennifer C Stoddart; Alexander D Liddle; Justin P Cobb; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Hip-Preserved Reconstruction Using a Customized Cementless Intercalary Endoprosthesis With an Intra-Neck Curved Stem in Patients With an Ultrashort Proximal Femur: Midterm Follow-Up Outcomes.

Authors:  Qi You; Minxun Lu; Li Min; Yuqi Zhang; Jie Wang; Yitian Wang; Chuanxi Zheng; Yong Zhou; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Exploratory Full-Field Mechanical Analysis across the Osteochondral Tissue-Biomaterial Interface in an Ovine Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Clark; Agathe Heyraud; Saman Tavana; Talal Al-Jabri; Francesca Tallia; Brett Clark; Gordon W Blunn; Justin P Cobb; Ulrich Hansen; Julian R Jones; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.