Literature DB >> 35386359

Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Elham Davoodi1,2,3,4, Hossein Montazerian2,3,4, Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi5, Masoud Zhianmanesh6, Osezua Ibhadode1, Shahriar Imani Shahabad1, Reza Esmaeilizadeh1, Einollah Sarikhani7, Sahar Toorandaz1, Shima A Sarabi8, Rohollah Nasiri4, Yangzhi Zhu4, Javad Kadkhodapour9,10, Bingbing Li11,4, Ali Khademhosseini4, Ehsan Toyserkani1.   

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) has led to an evolution in the design and fabrication of hard tissue substitutes, enabling personalized implants to address each patient's specific needs. In addition, internal pore architectures integrated within additively manufactured scaffolds, have provided an opportunity to further develop and engineer functional implants for better tissue integration, and long-term durability. In this review, the latest advances in different aspects of the design and manufacturing of additively manufactured metallic biomaterials are highlighted. After introducing metal AM processes, biocompatible metals adapted for integration with AM machines are presented. Then, we elaborate on the tools and approaches undertaken for the design of porous scaffold with engineered internal architecture including, topology optimization techniques, as well as unit cell patterns based on lattice networks, and triply periodic minimal surface. Here, the new possibilities brought by the functionally gradient porous structures to meet the conflicting scaffold design requirements are thoroughly discussed. Subsequently, the design constraints and physical characteristics of the additively manufactured constructs are reviewed in terms of input parameters such as design features and AM processing parameters. We assess the proposed applications of additively manufactured implants for regeneration of different tissue types and the efforts made towards their clinical translation. Finally, we conclude the review with the emerging directions and perspectives for further development of AM in the medical industry.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; Biomaterials; Metal implant; Porous scaffold; Tissue engineering

Year:  2021        PMID: 35386359      PMCID: PMC8941217          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioact Mater        ISSN: 2452-199X


  148 in total

Review 1.  Biomedical coatings on magnesium alloys - a review.

Authors:  H Hornberger; S Virtanen; A R Boccaccini
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  A New Type of Low Density Material: Shellular.

Authors:  Seung Chul Han; Jeong Woo Lee; Kiju Kang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering and regeneration.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Jie Huang; Roger J Narayan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.331

4.  Porous fusion cage design via integrated global-local topology optimization and biomechanical analysis of performance.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Yi Wan; Quhao Li; Yan Xia; Xinyu Liu; Zhanqiang Liu; Xiaogai Li
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-08-06

5.  Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Einollah Sarikhani; Hossein Montazerian; Samad Ahadian; Marco Costantini; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Stephanie Willerth; Konrad Walus; Mohammad Mofidfar; Ehsan Toyserkani; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-05-26

6.  Quality of extensive fixed prosthodontics after five years.

Authors:  P O Glantz; G Ryge; M D Jendresen; K Nilner
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Integration of surface modification and 3D fabrication techniques to prepare patterned poly(L-lactide) substrates allowing regionally selective cell adhesion.

Authors:  A Park; B Wu; L G Griffith
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 8.  Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants.

Authors:  Christian Fang; Hong Cai; Evelyn Kuong; Elvis Chui; Yuk Chuen Siu; Tao Ji; Igor Drstvenšek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  3D Printing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix to Design Biomimetic Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Silvia Baiguera; Costantino Del Gaudio; Paolo Di Nardo; Vittorio Manzari; Felicia Carotenuto; Laura Teodori
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Industry 5.0 in Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Madhan Jeyaraman; Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy; Naveen Jeyaraman
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 2.  A Critical Review of Additive Manufacturing Techniques and Associated Biomaterials Used in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yanli Wu; Yongtao Lu; Ming Zhao; Sergei Bosiakov; Lei Li
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Strength Tests of Alloys for Fixed Structures in Dental Prosthetics.

Authors:  Łukasz Bojko; Anna M Ryniewicz; Wojciech Ryniewicz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Hybrid Ti6Al4V/Silk Fibroin Composite for Load-Bearing Implants: A Hierarchical Multifunctional Cellular Scaffold.

Authors:  Simone Murchio; Matteo Benedetti; Anastasia Berto; Francesca Agostinacchio; Gianluca Zappini; Devid Maniglio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Designing anisotropic porous bone scaffolds using a self-learning convolutional neural network model.

Authors:  Yongtao Lu; Tingxiang Gong; Zhuoyue Yang; Hanxing Zhu; Yadong Liu; Chengwei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.