Literature DB >> 12757797

Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Elise F Morgan1, Harun H Bayraktar, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

One outstanding issue regarding the relationship between elastic modulus and density for trabecular bone is whether the relationship depends on anatomic site. To address this, on-axis elastic moduli and apparent densities were measured for 142 specimens of human trabecular bone from the vertebra (n=61), proximal tibia (n=31), femoral greater trochanter (n=23), and femoral neck (n=27). Specimens were obtained from 61 cadavers (mean+/-SD age=67+/-15 years). Experimental protocols were used that minimized end-artifact errors and controlled for specimen orientation. Tissue moduli were computed for a subset of 18 specimens using high-resolution linear finite element analyses and also using two previously developed theoretical relationships (Bone 25 (1999) 481; J. Elasticity 53 (1999) 125). Resultant power law regressions between modulus and density did depend on anatomic site, as determined via an analysis of covariance. The inter-site differences were among the leading coefficients (p<0.02), but not the exponents (p>0.08), which ranged 1.49-2.18. At a given density, specimens from the tibia had higher moduli than those from the vertebra (p=0.01) and femoral neck (p=0.002); those from the trochanter had higher moduli than the vertebra (p=0.02). These differences could be as large as almost 50%, and errors in predicted values of modulus increased by up to 65% when site-dependence was ignored. These results indicate that there is no universal modulus-density relationship for on-axis loading. Tissue moduli computed using methods that account for inter-site architectural variations did not differ across site (p>0.15), suggesting that the site-specificity in apparent modulus-density relationships may be attributed to differences in architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757797     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  205 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Simulation of the behaviour of the L1 vertebra for different material properties and loading conditions.

Authors:  Ibrahim Erdem; Eeric Truumees; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 3.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Irradiation does not modify mechanical properties of cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Daniel S Ramsey; Stephanie J Dux; Eileen H Chu; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Optimal sample volumes of human trabecular bone in μCT analysis within vertebral body and femoral head.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Wen; Chun-Lin Zong; Chao Xu; Xiang-Yu Ma; Fa-Qi Wang; Ya-Fei Feng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

7.  The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Paul M Huddleston; Jon J Camp; Kai-Nan An; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula.

Authors:  Gianni Campoli; Bart Bolsterlee; Frans van der Helm; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farvardin; Ehsan Basafa; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Regional variation of bone tissue properties at the human mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Erin Kosel; Amanda M Agnew; David W McComb; Kyle Bodnyk; Richard T Hart; Min Kyung Kim; Sang Yeun Han; William M Johnston
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.