Literature DB >> 11745521

Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits.

A I Itälä1, H O Ylänen, C Ekholm, K H Karlsson, H T Aro.   

Abstract

The optimal pore size for bone ingrowth is claimed to be 100-400 microm. With the use of a highly standardized experimental model, the present study reevaluated whether a pore size of 100 microm is the threshold value for bone ingrowth into porous structures under non-load-bearing conditions. Titanium triangle-shaped plates 250 or 500 microm thick were perforated with the use of a laser in order to create standard-sized holes ( 50, 75, 100, and 125 microm) in multiple rows. The amount of bone ingrowth through the implant holes was studied in the cancellous bone of the distal rabbit femur. Twelve weeks after implantation, detailed analysis of bone ingrowth was performed with computerized image analysis of backscattered electron imaging techniques of scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the amount of ingrown new bone was independent of the pore size and implant thickness. The median value for bone ingrowth varied between 64 and 78%. A striking feature was the formation of secondary osteonal structures even in the smallest holes. Based on these results, there is no threshold value for new bone ingrowth in pore sizes ranging from 50 to 125 microm under non-load-bearing conditions. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745521     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.1069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  43 in total

1.  In vivo behaviour of low-temperature calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite: comparison with deproteinised bovine bone.

Authors:  Pavel Sponer; Marie Strnadová; Karel Urban
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Mechanical properties of totally permeable titanium composite pylon for direct skeletal attachment.

Authors:  M Pitkin; J Pilling; G Raykhtsaum
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface: an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Mingdeng Rong; Lei Zhou; Zehong Gou; Andi Zhu; Dongfeng Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Characterization of porous glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) implant structures: porosity and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Anne Ylä-Soininmäki; Niko Moritz; Lippo V J Lassila; Matti Peltola; Hannu T Aro; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  New method of fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Charles Cassidy; Raghuveer Muppavarapu; James Raymond; Maxim Shevtsov; Oleg Galibin; Serge D Rousselle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

6.  The effect of bone ingrowth depth on the tensile and shear strength of the implant-bone e-beam produced interface.

Authors:  M Tarala; D Waanders; J E Biemond; G Hannink; D Janssen; P Buma; N Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  DNA/protamine complex paste for an injectable dental material.

Authors:  Tadao Fukushima; Jun Ohno; Rieko Imayoshi; Nana Mori; Ryuji Sakagami; Makoto Mitarai; Tohru Hayakawa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Fabrication of biocompatible titanium scaffolds using space holder technique.

Authors:  S Naddaf Dezfuli; S K Sadrnezhaad; M A Shokrgozar; S Bonakdar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Materials-Directed Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.

Authors:  J Kent Leach; Jacklyn Whitehead
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-03-14

10.  Creation of macroporous calcium phosphate cements as bone substitutes by using genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres.

Authors:  Meng Li; Xingyan Liu; Xudong Liu; Baofeng Ge; Keming Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.