Literature DB >> 20225262

Size and habit of mineral particles in bone and mineralized callus during bone healing in sheep.

Yifei Liu1, Inderchand Manjubala, Hanna Schell, Devakara R Epari, Paul Roschger, Georg N Duda, Peter Fratzl.   

Abstract

Bone healing is known to occur through the successive formation and resorption of various tissues with different structural and mechanical properties. To get a better insight into this sequence of events, we used environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) together with scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (sSAXS) to reveal the size and orientation of bone mineral particles within the regenerating callus tissues at different healing stages (2, 3, 6, and 9 weeks). Sections of 200 µm were cut from embedded blocks of midshaft tibial samples in a sheep osteotomy model with an external fixator. Regions of interest on the medial side of the proximal fragment were chosen to be the periosteal callus, middle callus, intercortical callus, and cortex. Mean thickness (T parameter), degree of alignment (ρ parameter), and predominant orientation (ψ parameter) of mineral particles were deduced from resulting sSAXS patterns with a spatial resolution of 200 µm. 2D maps of T and ρ overlapping with ESEM images revealed that the callus formation occurred in two waves of bone formation, whereby a highly disordered mineralized tissue was deposited first, followed by a bony tissue with more lamellar appearance in the ESEM and where the mineral particles were more aligned, as revealed by sSAXS. As a consequence, degree of alignment and mineral particle size within the callus increased with healing time, whereas at any given moment there were structural gradients, for example, from periosteal toward the middle callus.
© 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20225262     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  18 in total

1.  A comparative study of zirconium and titanium implants in rat: osseointegration and bone material quality.

Authors:  Rebecca M Hoerth; María R Katunar; Andrea Gomez Sanchez; Juan C Orellano; Silvia M Ceré; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Josefina Ballarre
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Tissue growth controlled by geometric boundary conditions: a simple model recapitulating aspects of callus formation and bone healing.

Authors:  F Dieter Fischer; Gerald A Zickler; John W C Dunlop; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Quantitative phenotyping of bone fracture repair: a review.

Authors:  Michele Casanova; Aaron Schindeler; David Little; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 4.  Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils.

Authors:  Marios Georgiadis; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Melorheostotic Bone Lesions Caused by Somatic Mutations in MAP2K1 Have Deteriorated Microarchitecture and Periosteal Reaction.

Authors:  Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Paul Roschger; Heeseog Kang; Smita Jha; Andreas Roschger; Stéphane Blouin; Zuoming Deng; Wayne A Cabral; Aleksandra Ivovic; James Katz; Richard M Siegel; Klaus Klaushofer; Peter Fratzl; Timothy Bhattacharyya; Joan C Marini
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The Design and In Vivo Testing of a Locally Stiffness-Matched Porous Scaffold.

Authors:  Shaaz Ghouse; Natalie Reznikov; Oliver R Boughton; Sarat Babu; K C Geoffrey Ng; Gordon Blunn; Justin P Cobb; Molly M Stevens; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Appl Mater Today       Date:  2019-03-14

Review 7.  Fragility of Bone Material Controlled by Internal Interfaces.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagermaier; Klaus Klaushofer; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Effect of in vivo loading on bone composition varies with animal age.

Authors:  Marta Aido; Michael Kerschnitzki; Rebecca Hoerth; Sara Checa; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Peter Fratzl; Georg N Duda; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.032

9.  Microfibril orientation dominates the microelastic properties of human bone tissue at the lamellar length scale.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Aurélien Gourrier; Fabienne Rupin; Kay Raum; Françoise Peyrin; Manfred Burghammer; Amena Saïed; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The compositional and nano-structural basis of fracture healing in healthy and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Neashan Mathavan; Mikael J Turunen; Manuel Guizar-Sicairos; Martin Bech; Florian Schaff; Magnus Tägil; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.