| Literature DB >> 31186510 |
Qiao Weng1,2,3, Keyong Deng4, Fang Wu4, Ming Gan4, Jie Li1,3, Yimin Dai1,2,3, Yue Jiang4, Jiaping Chen4, Juncheng Dai4, Hongxia Ma4, Zhibin Hu4,5, Hongbing Shen4,5, Jiangbo Du6,7, Yali Hu8,9,10, Guangfu Jin11,12.
Abstract
Telomere length (TL) is linked to various age-related diseases, but little is known about telomeres in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We surveyed 509 subjects (113 GDM patients and 396 frequency matched controls) in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Jiangsu province of eastern China. Relative telomere length (RTL) of genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of GDM risk were calculated across tertiles of RTL using logistic regression model. Lipid parameters during the third trimesters of gestation (after 32 weeks) were collected from medical records. The general linear correlation test was used to explore the associations of lipid parameters with RTL. Our results showed that the RTL in GDM patients were significantly shorter than controls (0.302 ± 0.112 vs. 0.336 ± 0.164, P = 0.046). However, the GDM risk was significantly increased in subjects with median RTL (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.936, 95% CI: 1.086, 3.453, P = 0.025) and the shortest RTL (aOR: 1.795, 95% CI: 1.004, 3.207, P = 0.048), compared to subjects with longest RTL. We also demonstrated that the lipid ratios (TC/TG, LDL/TG, HDL/TG, LDL/TC, TC/LDL) were significantly associated with RTL among controls. Overall, the present study indicated that attrition of telomeres would increase GDM risk among pregnant women, and the altered lipid levels may play an important role in RTL related GDM risk and pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31186510 PMCID: PMC6560111 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44968-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of study participants.
| Variables | Cases | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| N(%) | N(%) | ||
| Overall | 113 | 396 | |
|
| |||
| <25 | 15 (13.27) | 62 (15.66) | 0.059a |
| 25~30 | 51 (45.13) | 212 (53.54) | |
| 30~35 | 32 (28.32) | 97 (24.49) | |
| ≥35 | 15 (13.27) | 25 (6.31) | |
|
| |||
| <25% | 23 (20.35) | 98 (24.75) | 0.149a |
| 25~50% | 28 (24.78) | 100 (25.25) | |
| 50~75% | 19 (19.47) | 99 (25.00) | |
| ≥75% | 40 (35.40) | 99 (25.00) | |
|
| |||
| ≥Half an hour a day | 9 (7.96) | 27 (6.82) | 0.310a |
| <Half an hour a day | 21 (18.59) | 101 (25.51) | |
| Never | 83 (73.45) | 268 (67.67) | |
|
| |||
| Ever | 51 (45.13) | 167 (42.17) | 0.575a |
| Never | 62 (54.87) | 229 (57.83) | |
|
| |||
| Daily | 6 (5.31) | 17 (4.29) | 0.318a |
| 3~6 Times per week | 3 (2.65) | 27 (6.82) | |
| 1~2 Times per week | 28 (24.78) | 109 (27.53) | |
| Never | 76 (67.26) | 243 (61.36) | |
| RTL (Mean ± SD) | 0.302 ± 0.112 | 0.336 ± 0.164 | 0.046b |
| Gestation weeks of RTL (Mean ± SD) | 37.562 ± 1.319 | 37.820 ± 1.890 | 0.225b |
| Gestation weeks of lipid (Mean ± SD) | 32.482 ± 1.344 | 32.843 ± 3.077 | 0.284b |
| TC (Mean ± SD) | 5.681 ± 1.084 | 5.927 ± 1.252 | 0.136b |
| TG (Mean ± SD) | 2.754 ± 1.037 | 2.790 ± 1.417 | 0.841b |
| LDL (Mean ± SD) | 2.757 ± 0.820 | 2.897 ± 0.919 | 0.252b |
| HDL (Mean ± SD) | 1.666 ± 0.420 | 1.728 ± 0.426 | 0.284b |
| FBG (Mean ± SD) | 4.568 ± 0.530 | 4.511 ± 0.361 | 0.232b |
| 1-hour PBG (Mean ± SD) | 9.881 ± 1.384 | 8.489 ± 1.204 | <0.01b |
| 2-hour PBG (Mean ± SD) | 8.482 (1.295) | 6.790 ± 0.833 | <0.01b |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RTL, relative telomere length; FBG, fasting blood glucose; PBG, postprandial blood glucose; SD, standard deviation; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoprotein cholesterol.
aP value for χ2-test that was used to compare the differences between variables.
bP value for paired t-test that was used to compare the differences between variables.
Distributions of characteristics and RTL between GDM cases and controls.
| Variables | Cases | RTL Mean ± SD | Controls | RTL Mean ± SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | ||||
| Overall | 113 | 396 | |||
| <25 | 15 (13.27) | 0.360 ± 0.163 | 62 (15.66) | 0.355 ± 0.208 | 0.940 |
| 25~30 | 51 (45.13) | 0.227 ± 0.082 | 212 (53.54) | 0.338 ± 0.165 | 0.014 |
| 30~35 | 32 (28.32) | 0.297 ± 0.071 | 97 (24.49) | 0.315 ± 0.132 | 0.482 |
| ≥35 | 15 (13.27) | 0.341 ± 0.176 | 25 (6.31) | 0.352 ± 0.137 | 0.829 |
|
| |||||
| <25% | 23 (20.35) | 0.326 ± 0.147 | 98 (24.75) | 0.338 ± 0.161 | 0.759 |
| 25%~50% | 28 (24.78) | 0.290 ± 0.078 | 100 (25.25) | 0.337 ± 0.213 | 0.089 |
| 50%~75% | 22 (19.47) | 0.321 ± 0.105 | 99 (25.00) | 0.345 ± 0.156 | 0.512 |
| ≥75% | 40 (35.40) | 0.285 ± 0.114 | 99 (25.00) | 0.324 ± 0.111 | 0.081 |
|
| |||||
| ≥Half an hour a day | 9 (7.96) | 0.283 ± 0.075 | 27 (6.28) | 0.367 ± 0.210 | 0.257 |
| <Half an hour a day | 21 (18.59) | 0.293 ± 0.099 | 101 (25.51) | 0.361 ± 0.222 | 0.173 |
| Never | 83 (73.45) | 0.307 ± 0.121 | 268 (67.67) | 0.326 ± 0.132 | 0.289 |
|
| |||||
| Ever | 51 (45.13) | 0.315 ± 0.129 | 167 (42.17) | 0.335 ± 0.152 | 0.422 |
| Never | 62 (54.87) | 0.291 ± 0.095 | 229 (57.83) | 0.337 ± 0.172 | 0.054 |
|
| |||||
| Daily | 6 (5.31) | 0.307 ± 0.093 | 17 (4.29) | 0.258 ± 0.138 | 0.431 |
| 3~6 Times per week | 3 (2.65) | 0.238 ± 0.047 | 27 (6.82) | 0.307 ± 0.127 | 0.366 |
| 1~2 Times per week | 28 (24.78) | 0.312 ± 0.091 | 109 (27.53) | 0.307 ± 0.124 | 0.874 |
| Never | 76 (67.26) | 0.300 ± 0.123 | 243 (61.36) | 0.358 ± 0.181 | 0.013 |
aDerived from t-test for RTL between cases and controls.
Association between RTL and GDM risk among Chinese women.
| Grouping of RTL by controls category | Cases, N (%) | Controls, N (%) | OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI)a |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile | ≥0.355 | 23 (21.9) | 121 (33.3) | 1.000 (reference) | — | 1.000 (reference) | — |
| 0.264~0.355 | 42 (40.0) | 121 (33.3) | 1.826 (1.035, 3.221) | 0.038 | 1.936 (1.086, 3.453) | 0.025 | |
| <0.264 | 40 (38.1) | 121 (33.3) | 1.739 (0.982, 3.080) | 0.058 | 1.795 (1.004, 3.207) | 0.048 |
aDerived from logistic regression with an adjustment for Maternal age at delivery(years).
Correlation between lipid parameter ratios† and RTL among controls.
| TC | TG | LDL | HDL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | — | r = 0.215; P = 0.002 | r = −0.185; P = 0.008 | r < 0.001; P = 0.998 |
| TG | r = −0.101; P = 0.150 | — | r = 0.121; P = 0.086 | r = −0.077; P = 0.276 |
| LDL | r = 0.214; P = 0.002 | r = 0.283; P < 0.001 | — | r = 0.080; P = 0.256 |
| HDL | r = −0.025; P = 0.722 | r = 0.162; P = 0.021 | r = 0.120; P = 0.089 | — |
†Lipid ratios are calculated by lipid parameters at the header column (the left of the table) divided by lipid parameters at the header row (the upper of the table) of the table.