Literature DB >> 18463375

Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Boyd E Metzger, Lynn P Lowe, Alan R Dyer, Elisabeth R Trimble, Udom Chaovarindr, Donald R Coustan, David R Hadden, David R McCance, Moshe Hod, Harold David McIntyre, Jeremy J N Oats, Bengt Persson, Michael S Rogers, David A Sacks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether maternal hyperglycemia less severe than that in diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 25,505 pregnant women at 15 centers in nine countries underwent 75-g oral glucose-tolerance testing at 24 to 32 weeks of gestation. Data remained blinded if the fasting plasma glucose level was 105 mg per deciliter (5.8 mmol per liter) or less and the 2-hour plasma glucose level was 200 mg per deciliter (11.1 mmol per liter) or less. Primary outcomes were birth weight above the 90th percentile for gestational age, primary cesarean delivery, clinically diagnosed neonatal hypoglycemia, and cord-blood serum C-peptide level above the 90th percentile. Secondary outcomes were delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, shoulder dystocia or birth injury, need for intensive neonatal care, hyperbilirubinemia, and preeclampsia.
RESULTS: For the 23,316 participants with blinded data, we calculated adjusted odds ratios for adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with an increase in the fasting plasma glucose level of 1 SD (6.9 mg per deciliter [0.4 mmol per liter]), an increase in the 1-hour plasma glucose level of 1 SD (30.9 mg per deciliter [1.7 mmol per liter]), and an increase in the 2-hour plasma glucose level of 1 SD (23.5 mg per deciliter [1.3 mmol per liter]). For birth weight above the 90th percentile, the odds ratios were 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32 to 1.44), 1.46 (1.39 to 1.53), and 1.38 (1.32 to 1.44), respectively; for cord-blood serum C-peptide level above the 90th percentile, 1.55 (95% CI, 1.47 to 1.64), 1.46 (1.38 to 1.54), and 1.37 (1.30 to 1.44); for primary cesarean delivery, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.15), 1.10 (1.06 to 1.15), and 1.08 (1.03 to 1.12); and for neonatal hypoglycemia, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.19), 1.13 (1.03 to 1.26), and 1.10 (1.00 to 1.12). There were no obvious thresholds at which risks increased. Significant associations were also observed for secondary outcomes, although these tended to be weaker.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate strong, continuous associations of maternal glucose levels below those diagnostic of diabetes with increased birth weight and increased cord-blood serum C-peptide levels. Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18463375     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1411 in total

Review 1.  Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings for improving maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Joanna Tieu; Andrew J McPhee; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Candace Robledo; Nansi Boghossian; Cuilin Zhang; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

3.  Early Pregnancy Maternal Lipid Profiles and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Stratified for Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Guanghui Li; Lijun Kong; Li Zhang; Ling Fan; Yixin Su; James C Rose; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Glycemic targets in pregnancies affected by diabetes: historical perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  Diabetes-induced birth defects: what do we know? What can we do?

Authors:  E Albert Reece
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Ethnic Disparities in Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Lili Yuen; Vincent W Wong; David Simmons
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  An abnormal screening glucose challenge test in pregnancy predicts postpartum metabolic dysfunction, even when the antepartum oral glucose tolerance test is normal.

Authors:  Ravi Retnakaran; Ying Qi; Mathew Sermer; Philip W Connelly; Anthony J G Hanley; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Pregnancy outcomes after metformin treatment for gestational diabetes: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jyoti Balani; Steve Hyer; Antoinette Johnson; Hassan Shehata
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2012-04-23

9.  Predictive Characteristics of Elevated 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Results for Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George R Saade; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Geetha Mukerji; Denice S Feig
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.