Qi Han1, Xianchao Kong1, Yulan Cui1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of high-quality nursing service in the delivery room on puerperae and newborns. METHODS: Clinical data of 100 puerperae who came to our hospital for delivery were analyzed in this retrospective study. The puerperae were divided into an observation group (50 cases) and a control group (50 cases) according to the nursing model they received. The observation group was given high-quality nursing, and the control group was given routine nursing. The levels of blood glucose and blood pressure, scores of Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), delivery mode, nursing satisfaction and perinatal health status were recorded and compared. RESULTS: After childbirth, the SAS and SDS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05). The amniotic fluid index of the observation group was increased significantly (P<0.001). The total nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (t=14.324, P<0.001). The health status of neonates in the observation group was better than that in the control group (χ2=4.762, P=0.029). After intervention, the levels of blood glucose and blood pressure in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05). CONCLUSION: High-quality nursing for puerperae in the delivery room improves their negative psychological emotions, which is of significance for delivery and nursing work. AJTR
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of high-quality nursing service in the delivery room on puerperae and newborns. METHODS: Clinical data of 100 puerperae who came to our hospital for delivery were analyzed in this retrospective study. The puerperae were divided into an observation group (50 cases) and a control group (50 cases) according to the nursing model they received. The observation group was given high-quality nursing, and the control group was given routine nursing. The levels of blood glucose and blood pressure, scores of Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), delivery mode, nursing satisfaction and perinatal health status were recorded and compared. RESULTS: After childbirth, the SAS and SDS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05). The amniotic fluid index of the observation group was increased significantly (P<0.001). The total nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (t=14.324, P<0.001). The health status of neonates in the observation group was better than that in the control group (χ2=4.762, P=0.029). After intervention, the levels of blood glucose and blood pressure in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (both P<0.05). CONCLUSION: High-quality nursing for puerperae in the delivery room improves their negative psychological emotions, which is of significance for delivery and nursing work. AJTR
Authors: Amar A Desai; Roger Bolus; Allen Nissenson; Sally Bolus; Matthew D Solomon; Osman Khawar; Matthew Gitlin; Jennifer Talley; Brennan M R Spiegel Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Daniel L Hall; Michael H Antoni; Emily G Lattie; Devika R Jutagir; Sara J Czaja; Dolores Perdomo; Suzanne C Lechner; Jamie M Stagl; Laura C Bouchard; Lisa M Gudenkauf; Lara Traeger; MaryAnn Fletcher; Nancy G Klimas Journal: Fatigue Date: 2015
Authors: Izumi Chihara; Donald K Hayes; Linda R Chock; Loretta J Fuddy; Deborah L Rosenberg; Arden S Handler Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2014-07
Authors: Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Line Rode; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272