Literature DB >> 31183967

Dosimetric study of the plan quality and dose to organs at risk on tangential breast treatments using the Halcyon linac.

Everardo Flores-Martinez1, Gwe-Ya Kim1, Catheryn M Yashar1, Laura I Cerviño1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the plan quality and doses to the heart, contralateral breast (CB), ipsilateral lung (IL), and contralateral lung (CL) in tangential breast treatments using the Halcyon linac with megavoltage setup fields.
METHODS: Radiotherapy treatment plans with tangential beams from 25 breast cancer patients previously treated on a C-arm linac were replanned for Halcyon. Thirteen corresponded to right-sided breasts and 12 to left-sided breasts, all with a dose prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Plans were created with the following setup imaging techniques: low-dose (LD) MVCBCT, high-quality (HQ) MVCBCT, LD-MV and HQ-MV pairs and the imaging dose was included in the plans. Plan quality metric values for the lumpectomy cavity, whole-breast and doses to the organs at risk (OARs) were measured and compared with those from the original plans.
RESULTS: No significant differences in plan quality were observed between the original and Halcyon plans. An increase in the mean dose (Mean) for all the organs was observed for the Halcyon plans. For right-sided plans, the accumulated Mean over the 25 fractions in the C-arm plans was 0.4 ± 0.3, 0.2 ± 0.2, 5.4 ± 1.3, and 0.1 ± 0.1 Gy for the heart, CB, IL, and CL, respectively, while values in the MVCBCT-LD Halcyon plans were 1.2 ± 0.2, 0.6 ± 0.1, 6.5 ± 1.4, and 0.4 ± 0.1 Gy, respectively. For left-sided treatments, Mean in the original plans was 0.9 ± 0.2, 0.1 ± 0.0, 4.2 ± 1.2, and 0.0 ± 0.0 Gy, while for the MVCBCT-LD Halcyon plans values were 1.9 ± 0.2, 0.6 ± 0.2, 5.1 ± 1.2, and 0.5 ± 0.2 Gy, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Plan quality for breast treatments using Halcyon is similar to the quality for a 6 MV, C-arm plan. For treatments using megavoltage setup fields, the dose contribution to OARs from the imaging fields can be equal or higher than the dose from treatment fields.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose to OARs; Halcyon; IGRT; breast

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31183967      PMCID: PMC6612683          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  27 in total

1.  Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy with flattening filter-free beams compared with static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Giorgia Nicolini; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava; Sushovan Banerjee; Suresh Chaudhary; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Anusheel Munshi; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Pietro Mancosu; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A Monte Carlo study of a flattening filter-free linear accelerator verified with measurements.

Authors:  Mårten Dalaryd; Gabriele Kragl; Crister Ceberg; Dietmar Georg; Brendan McClean; Sacha af Wetterstedt; Elinore Wieslander; Tommy Knöös
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Clinical experience in breast irradiation with intensity modulated photon beams.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Jacques Bernier
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75.

Authors:  Martin J Murphy; James Balter; Stephen Balter; Jose A BenComo; Indra J Das; Steve B Jiang; C M Ma; Gustavo H Olivera; Raymond F Rodebaugh; Kenneth J Ruchala; Hiroki Shirato; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy.

Authors:  Leah K Schubert; Vinai Gondi; Evan Sengbusch; David C Westerly; Emilie T Soisson; Bhudatt R Paliwal; Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Minesh P Mehta; Rakesh R Patel; Wolfgang A Tomé; George M Cannon
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Gustavo Werutsky; Ian S Fentiman; Emiel Rutgers; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Erik Van Limbergen; Margreet H A Baaijens; Jan Bogaerts; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Frame-less and mask-less cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura I Cerviño; Todd Pawlicki; Joshua D Lawson; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Using surface imaging and visual coaching to improve the reproducibility and stability of deep-inspiration breath hold for left-breast-cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Laura I Cerviño; Sonia Gupta; Mary A Rose; Catheryn Yashar; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Dose to the contralateral breast from radiotherapy and risk of second primary breast cancer in the WECARE study.

Authors:  Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Bryan M Langholz; John D Boice; Roy E Shore; Michael Andersson; Thomas A Buchholz; Marinela Capanu; Leslie Bernstein; Charles F Lynch; Kathleen E Malone; Hoda Anton-Culver; Robert W Haile; Barry S Rosenstein; Anne S Reiner; Duncan C Thomas; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Does TomoDirect 3DCRT represent a suitable option for post-operative whole breast irradiation? A hypothesis-generating pilot study.

Authors:  Valeria Casanova Borca; Pierfrancesco Franco; Paola Catuzzo; Fernanda Migliaccio; Flora Zenone; Stefania Aimonetto; Andrea Peruzzo; Massimo Pasquino; Giuliana Russo; Maria Rosa La Porta; Domenico Cante; Piera Sciacero; Giuseppe Girelli; Umberto Ricardi; Santi Tofani
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  8 in total

1.  Initial Clinical Experience Treating Patients With Gynecologic Cancers on a 6MV Flattening Filter Free O-Ring Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Andrew R Barsky; Michele M Kim; Alexandra Dreyfuss; Lei Dong; James M Metz; Shibu Anamalayil; Taoran Li; Neil K Taunk
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-08

2.  Effect of treatment planning system parameters on beam modulation complexity for treatment plans with single-layer multi-leaf collimator and dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Paulo Quintero; Yongqiang Cheng; David Benoit; Craig Moore; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Comprehensive validation of halcyon 2.0 plans and the implementation of patient specific QA with multiple detector platforms.

Authors:  Eric Laugeman; Ana Heermann; Jessica Hilliard; Michael Watts; Marshia Roberson; Robert Morris; Sreekrishna Goddu; Abhishek Sethi; Imran Zoberi; Hyun Kim; Sasa Mutic; Geoffrey Hugo; Bin Cai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Two-Level Factorial Pre-TomoBreast Pilot Study of Tomotherapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Post Hoc Utility of a Mean Absolute Dose Deviation Penalty Score.

Authors:  Steve Heymann; Giovanna Dipasquale; Nam P Nguyen; Meymey San; Olena Gorobets; Nicolas Leduc; Dirk Verellen; Guy Storme; Hilde Van Parijs; Mark De Ridder; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

5.  Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with the trilogy and the Halcyon for bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Xiutong Lin; Guifang Zhang; Qingtao Qiu; Chengqiang Li; Yong Yin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Prostate SBRT using O-Ring Halcyon Linac - Plan quality, delivery efficiency, and accuracy.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Tanner Tackett; Joseph Stephen; Justin Visak; Falguni Amin-Zimmerman; Andrew McGregor; Stephen E Strup; William St Clair
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Clinical validation of ring-mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: comparison to SBRT-dedicated C-arm linac treatments.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Justin Visak; Lana C Critchfield; Joseph Stephen; Mark E Bernard; Marcus Randall; Mahesh Kudrimoti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparison of sliding window and field-in-field techniques for tangential whole breast irradiation using the Halcyon and Synergy Agility systems.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Sonja Wegener; Kathrin Breuer; Gary Razinskas; Stefan Weick; Florian Exner; Klaus Bratengeier; Michael Flentje; Otto Sauer; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.